Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/25051 |
Resumo: | This article offers a new formulation of the Socratic principle known as the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue (PSV). It is divided in three sections. In the first section I criticize Vlastos’ formulation of the PSV. In the second section I present the weighing model of practical deliberation, introduce the concepts of reason for action, simple reason, sufficient reason and conclusive reason that were offered by Thomas Scanlon in Being realistic about reasons (2014), and then I adapt these concepts so as to render them apt to be used in the formulation I intend to offer. In the third section I present my formulation of the PSV using the concepts introduced in the second section and explain why I believe this formulation is better than the one offered by Vlastos. |
id |
UNB-18_918014d9e6c3e7603940089dfccb4105 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25051 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of VirtuePlatoSocratesVlastosScanlonvirtuenormativityThis article offers a new formulation of the Socratic principle known as the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue (PSV). It is divided in three sections. In the first section I criticize Vlastos’ formulation of the PSV. In the second section I present the weighing model of practical deliberation, introduce the concepts of reason for action, simple reason, sufficient reason and conclusive reason that were offered by Thomas Scanlon in Being realistic about reasons (2014), and then I adapt these concepts so as to render them apt to be used in the formulation I intend to offer. In the third section I present my formulation of the PSV using the concepts introduced in the second section and explain why I believe this formulation is better than the one offered by Vlastos.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2020-06-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/2505110.14195/1984-249X_30_9Revista Archai; No. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03009Archai Journal; n. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e030091984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_30reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/25051/26066Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Simão Nascimento (Author)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Daniel Simão2020-06-02T12:15:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25051Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2020-06-02T12:15:34Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
title |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
spellingShingle |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue Nascimento, Daniel Simão Plato Socrates Vlastos Scanlon virtue normativity |
title_short |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
title_full |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
title_fullStr |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
title_full_unstemmed |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
title_sort |
Socrates, Vlastos, Scanlon and the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue |
author |
Nascimento, Daniel Simão |
author_facet |
Nascimento, Daniel Simão |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nascimento, Daniel Simão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plato Socrates Vlastos Scanlon virtue normativity |
topic |
Plato Socrates Vlastos Scanlon virtue normativity |
description |
This article offers a new formulation of the Socratic principle known as the Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue (PSV). It is divided in three sections. In the first section I criticize Vlastos’ formulation of the PSV. In the second section I present the weighing model of practical deliberation, introduce the concepts of reason for action, simple reason, sufficient reason and conclusive reason that were offered by Thomas Scanlon in Being realistic about reasons (2014), and then I adapt these concepts so as to render them apt to be used in the formulation I intend to offer. In the third section I present my formulation of the PSV using the concepts introduced in the second section and explain why I believe this formulation is better than the one offered by Vlastos. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/25051 10.14195/1984-249X_30_9 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/25051 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_30_9 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/25051/26066 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Simão Nascimento (Author) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Simão Nascimento (Author) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03009 Archai Journal; n. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03009 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_30 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319945432432640 |