Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fronterotta, Francesco
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8615
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to examine heraclitean fragments evoking the metaphor of rivers and waters flowing, usually associated by tradition to the image of reality in becoming and the conception of nature as a more or less disordered streaming. These fragments are certainly among the most celebrated and lucky fragments of the philosopher of Ephesus, which can be explained by the fact that they have been used since Plato and Aristotle, to represent in an exemplary way the philosophical perspective of Heraclitus. These are the three fragments which appear in the collection of Diels and Kranz under the numbers 12, 49a and 91, and correspond, in the edition of Marcovich to the numbers 40, 40c2 and 40c3. This mere indication brings out the problem that should be given priority review with regard to the three mentioned fragments, this is the one of their authenticity. Admitted by Diels and Kranz and by a certain number of scholars, among which stands out Mouraviev, it is rejected, with respect fragments 49a and 91 DK [40c2 and 40c3 Marcovich] by other commentators, and primarily by Marcovich for whom, as suggested by the numbering that adopted itself, should be considered as mere reminiscences of the fragments 12 DK [40 Marcovich], the only authentic.
id UNB-18_a9bf9ff2b5780e1ed40080b50d9c7af3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8615
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxographyHeraclitusPlatoAristotleflowDiels-KranzMarcovichThe purpose of this paper is to examine heraclitean fragments evoking the metaphor of rivers and waters flowing, usually associated by tradition to the image of reality in becoming and the conception of nature as a more or less disordered streaming. These fragments are certainly among the most celebrated and lucky fragments of the philosopher of Ephesus, which can be explained by the fact that they have been used since Plato and Aristotle, to represent in an exemplary way the philosophical perspective of Heraclitus. These are the three fragments which appear in the collection of Diels and Kranz under the numbers 12, 49a and 91, and correspond, in the edition of Marcovich to the numbers 40, 40c2 and 40c3. This mere indication brings out the problem that should be given priority review with regard to the three mentioned fragments, this is the one of their authenticity. Admitted by Diels and Kranz and by a certain number of scholars, among which stands out Mouraviev, it is rejected, with respect fragments 49a and 91 DK [40c2 and 40c3 Marcovich] by other commentators, and primarily by Marcovich for whom, as suggested by the numbering that adopted itself, should be considered as mere reminiscences of the fragments 12 DK [40 Marcovich], the only authentic.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2015-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossierDossiêapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/861510.14195/1984-249X_15_11Revista Archai; Vol. 15 No. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 117Archai Journal; v. 15 n. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 1171984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_15reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8615/7174Fronterotta, Francescoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-07T17:12:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8615Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2018-06-07T17:12:35Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
title Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
spellingShingle Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
Fronterotta, Francesco
Heraclitus
Plato
Aristotle
flow
Diels-Kranz
Marcovich
title_short Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
title_full Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
title_fullStr Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
title_full_unstemmed Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
title_sort Heraclitus , the becoming and the Platonic-Aristotelian doxography
author Fronterotta, Francesco
author_facet Fronterotta, Francesco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fronterotta, Francesco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Heraclitus
Plato
Aristotle
flow
Diels-Kranz
Marcovich
topic Heraclitus
Plato
Aristotle
flow
Diels-Kranz
Marcovich
description The purpose of this paper is to examine heraclitean fragments evoking the metaphor of rivers and waters flowing, usually associated by tradition to the image of reality in becoming and the conception of nature as a more or less disordered streaming. These fragments are certainly among the most celebrated and lucky fragments of the philosopher of Ephesus, which can be explained by the fact that they have been used since Plato and Aristotle, to represent in an exemplary way the philosophical perspective of Heraclitus. These are the three fragments which appear in the collection of Diels and Kranz under the numbers 12, 49a and 91, and correspond, in the edition of Marcovich to the numbers 40, 40c2 and 40c3. This mere indication brings out the problem that should be given priority review with regard to the three mentioned fragments, this is the one of their authenticity. Admitted by Diels and Kranz and by a certain number of scholars, among which stands out Mouraviev, it is rejected, with respect fragments 49a and 91 DK [40c2 and 40c3 Marcovich] by other commentators, and primarily by Marcovich for whom, as suggested by the numbering that adopted itself, should be considered as mere reminiscences of the fragments 12 DK [40 Marcovich], the only authentic.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Dossier
Dossiê
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8615
10.14195/1984-249X_15_11
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8615
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_15_11
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8615/7174
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; Vol. 15 No. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 117
Archai Journal; v. 15 n. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 117
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_15
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319944462499840