Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gardella, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/24156
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to analyze Dialex. § 5 in order to show that the author not only uses eristical arguments, but he also offers a solution to them. First, I present some general remarks about the date of composition, authorship, and structure of the treatise so as to appreciate the singularity of the fifth paragraph. Then, I offer a complete translation of Dialex. § 5 and I point out the similarities between the arguments presented there and some eristic paradoxes discussed in Plato's Euthydemus and Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations. Finally, I analyze Dialex. § 5. 15 and I propose an interpretation of the argument based on the philosophical context in which it was formulated.
id UNB-18_ab7973c847c1407a4d24e4a9cbd91e29
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24156
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretaciónDissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretaciónDissoì lógoiantilogíarelativismoparadojaerísticaDissoì LógoiAntilogyRelativismParadoxEristicThe aim of this paper is to analyze Dialex. § 5 in order to show that the author not only uses eristical arguments, but he also offers a solution to them. First, I present some general remarks about the date of composition, authorship, and structure of the treatise so as to appreciate the singularity of the fifth paragraph. Then, I offer a complete translation of Dialex. § 5 and I point out the similarities between the arguments presented there and some eristic paradoxes discussed in Plato's Euthydemus and Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations. Finally, I analyze Dialex. § 5. 15 and I propose an interpretation of the argument based on the philosophical context in which it was formulated.El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar Dialex. § 5 a fin de mostrar que allí no sólo se hace uso de paradojas erísticas para la argumentación, sino que al mismo tiempo se propone un criterio para resolverlas. Para ello, en primer lugar, expongo algunas consideraciones generales sobre la datación, la autoría y la estructura de Dialex. que permitirán comprender las particularidades del quinto parágrafo del tratado. Luego, presento la traducción completa de Dialex. § 5 y señalo algunas semejanzas entre los razonamientos que allí se desarrollan y los atribuidos a los erísticos en Eutidemo de Platón y Refutaciones sofísticas de Aristóteles. Finalmente, analizo el argumento presentado en Dialex. § 5. 15 y ofrezco una interpretación que atienda a su sentido y al contexto de la discusión filosófica en el que ha sido formulado.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2019-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/2415610.14195/1984-249X_26_1Revista Archai; No. 26 (2019): Archai 26 (2019 [2]); e02601Archai Journal; n. 26 (2019): Archai 26 (2019 [2]); e026011984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_26reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/24156/21486Copyright (c) 2019 Mariana Gardellainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGardella, Mariana2019-08-19T15:34:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24156Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-19T15:34:15Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
title Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
spellingShingle Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
Gardella, Mariana
Dissoì lógoi
antilogía
relativismo
paradoja
erística
Dissoì Lógoi
Antilogy
Relativism
Paradox
Eristic
title_short Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
title_full Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
title_fullStr Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
title_full_unstemmed Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
title_sort Dissoì lógoi § 5: contextualización, traducción e interpretación
author Gardella, Mariana
author_facet Gardella, Mariana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gardella, Mariana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dissoì lógoi
antilogía
relativismo
paradoja
erística
Dissoì Lógoi
Antilogy
Relativism
Paradox
Eristic
topic Dissoì lógoi
antilogía
relativismo
paradoja
erística
Dissoì Lógoi
Antilogy
Relativism
Paradox
Eristic
description The aim of this paper is to analyze Dialex. § 5 in order to show that the author not only uses eristical arguments, but he also offers a solution to them. First, I present some general remarks about the date of composition, authorship, and structure of the treatise so as to appreciate the singularity of the fifth paragraph. Then, I offer a complete translation of Dialex. § 5 and I point out the similarities between the arguments presented there and some eristic paradoxes discussed in Plato's Euthydemus and Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations. Finally, I analyze Dialex. § 5. 15 and I propose an interpretation of the argument based on the philosophical context in which it was formulated.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/24156
10.14195/1984-249X_26_1
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/24156
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_26_1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/24156/21486
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Mariana Gardella
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Mariana Gardella
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 26 (2019): Archai 26 (2019 [2]); e02601
Archai Journal; n. 26 (2019): Archai 26 (2019 [2]); e02601
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_26
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945411461120

Registros relacionados