Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: González-Varela, Edgar
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/34572
Resumo: Aristotle formulates in Metaphysics M.9 an aporia about Forms, according to which, those who introduce Forms make them universal substances and, at the same time, separate entities and, hence, particulars. But, he claims, it is not possible that both attributes, being a universal and being a particular, inhere in the same thing. The interpretation that scholars have offered of this objection is external, in that they hold that it derives from Aristotle’s own conception of separation: only what is particular is separate. Here I defend an internal interpretation which claims that the objection derives from an assumption about the explanatory role of Forms that Aristotle attributes to the Platonists.
id UNB-18_ed42ffc33426c0400c523adbfd410668
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34572
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9La objeción de Aristóteles en contra de las Formas en Metafísica M.9particularityPlatoseparationsubstanceuniversalsparticularidadPlatónseparaciónsubstanciauniversalesAristotle formulates in Metaphysics M.9 an aporia about Forms, according to which, those who introduce Forms make them universal substances and, at the same time, separate entities and, hence, particulars. But, he claims, it is not possible that both attributes, being a universal and being a particular, inhere in the same thing. The interpretation that scholars have offered of this objection is external, in that they hold that it derives from Aristotle’s own conception of separation: only what is particular is separate. Here I defend an internal interpretation which claims that the objection derives from an assumption about the explanatory role of Forms that Aristotle attributes to the Platonists.En Metafísica M.9 Aristóteles expone una aporía sobre las Formas, según la cual, los que introducen Formas las hacen substancias universales y, al mismo tiempo, entidades separadas y, por ello, particulares. Pero, sostiene, no es posible que ambos atributos, ser universal y particular, se den en la misma cosa. La interpretación que los especialistas han defendido de esta objeción es externa, en tanto que sostienen que se deriva de la propia concepción aristotélica de la separación: solo lo que es particular está separado. Aquí defiendo una interpretación interna que afirma que la objeción se deriva de un supuesto sobre el rol explicativo de las Formas que Aristóteles le atribuye a los platónicos.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2020-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigoshttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3457210.14195/1984-249X_30_30Revista Archai; No. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03030Archai Journal; n. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e030301984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_30reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/34572/27709Copyright (c) 2020 Edgar González-Varelahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzález-Varela, Edgar2020-10-04T20:58:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34572Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2020-10-04T20:58:56Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
La objeción de Aristóteles en contra de las Formas en Metafísica M.9
title Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
spellingShingle Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
González-Varela, Edgar
particularity
Plato
separation
substance
universals
particularidad
Platón
separación
substancia
universales
title_short Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
title_full Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
title_fullStr Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
title_full_unstemmed Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
title_sort Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9
author González-Varela, Edgar
author_facet González-Varela, Edgar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv González-Varela, Edgar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv particularity
Plato
separation
substance
universals
particularidad
Platón
separación
substancia
universales
topic particularity
Plato
separation
substance
universals
particularidad
Platón
separación
substancia
universales
description Aristotle formulates in Metaphysics M.9 an aporia about Forms, according to which, those who introduce Forms make them universal substances and, at the same time, separate entities and, hence, particulars. But, he claims, it is not possible that both attributes, being a universal and being a particular, inhere in the same thing. The interpretation that scholars have offered of this objection is external, in that they hold that it derives from Aristotle’s own conception of separation: only what is particular is separate. Here I defend an internal interpretation which claims that the objection derives from an assumption about the explanatory role of Forms that Aristotle attributes to the Platonists.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/34572
10.14195/1984-249X_30_30
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/34572
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_30_30
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/34572/27709
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Edgar González-Varela
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Edgar González-Varela
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03030
Archai Journal; n. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3]); e03030
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_30
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945642147840

Registros relacionados