Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
Texto Completo: | https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838 |
Resumo: | Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the determinants of short-term debt (STD) and long-term debt (LTD) of the companies that make up the B3 SMLL Index in order to identify which theory, trade-off or pecking order better describes the behavior of these companies.Method: Panel data models were used, having as explanatory variables the profitability, risk, size, current liquidity, growth and tangibility of the assets.Relevance: The study stands out by analyzing the adequacy of capital structure theories to the context of smaller capitalization companies listed on the stock exchange of an emerging country.Results: The results showed that the profitability and the current liquidity presented a negative relation with the STD, while the variables size, growth and tangibility presented a positive relation with this variable. In the long run, the variables profitability and tangibility presented a negative relation with the LTD, and the variables risk and size presented a positive relation with this indebtedness measure.Theoretical contributions: The theoretical contribution of the study lies in the fact that, in the short term, pecking order theory was more adequate to describe the choice of indebtedness level, while for long-term indebtedness, there was no predominance of a theory.Contributions to management: In the practical field, the study contributes to point out the relationship between different variables and the decision of indebtedness, which is useful for a more assertive decision-making by investors and managers. |
id |
UNB-21_5858af95f5e99cc2d5cc5689a62d18da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/1838 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-21 |
network_name_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3Determinantes da Estrutura de Capital das Empresas que Compõem o Índice Small Caps da B3Capital StructureTrade-offPecking Order.Estrutura de CapitalTrade-offPecking Order.Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the determinants of short-term debt (STD) and long-term debt (LTD) of the companies that make up the B3 SMLL Index in order to identify which theory, trade-off or pecking order better describes the behavior of these companies.Method: Panel data models were used, having as explanatory variables the profitability, risk, size, current liquidity, growth and tangibility of the assets.Relevance: The study stands out by analyzing the adequacy of capital structure theories to the context of smaller capitalization companies listed on the stock exchange of an emerging country.Results: The results showed that the profitability and the current liquidity presented a negative relation with the STD, while the variables size, growth and tangibility presented a positive relation with this variable. In the long run, the variables profitability and tangibility presented a negative relation with the LTD, and the variables risk and size presented a positive relation with this indebtedness measure.Theoretical contributions: The theoretical contribution of the study lies in the fact that, in the short term, pecking order theory was more adequate to describe the choice of indebtedness level, while for long-term indebtedness, there was no predominance of a theory.Contributions to management: In the practical field, the study contributes to point out the relationship between different variables and the decision of indebtedness, which is useful for a more assertive decision-making by investors and managers.Objetivo: O estudo objetivou analisar os determinantes do endividamento de curto (ECP) e de longo prazo (ELP) das empresas que compõem o Índice SMLL da B3, a fim de identificar qual teoria, trade-off ou pecking order, melhor descreve o comportamento destas empresas.Método: Foram empregados modelos de dados em painel, tendo como variáveis explicativas a rentabilidade, o risco, o tamanho, a liquidez corrente, o crescimento e a tangibilidade dos ativos.Relevância: O estudo destaca-se por analisar a adequação das teorias sobre estrutura de capital ao contexto de empresas de menor capitalização, listadas em bolsa de valores de um país emergente.Resultados: Nos resultados apontou-se que, a rentabilidade e a liquidez corrente apresentaram uma relação negativa com o ECP, enquanto as variáveis tamanho, crescimento e tangibilidade apresentaram uma relação positiva com esta variável. No longo prazo, as variáveis rentabilidade e tangibilidade apresentaram uma relação negativa com o ELP e, as variáveis risco e tamanho apresentaram uma relação positiva com essa medida de endividamento.Contribuições teóricas: A contribuição teórica do estudo reside no apontamento de que, no curto prazo, a teoria da pecking order mostrou-se mais adequada para descrever a escolha do nível de endividamento, enquanto para o endividamento de longo prazo, não houve predomínio de uma teoria.Contribuições para a gestão: No campo prático, o estudo contribui ao apontar a relação entre diferentes variáveis e a decisão de endividamento, sendo tal conhecimento útil para uma tomada de decisão mais assertiva pelos investidores e gestores. Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2019-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/183810.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n2a5Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 22 n. 2 (2019); 227-2421984-39251984-3925reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Gabriel Augusto deRibeiro, João EduardoAmaral, Hudson Fernandes2019-12-10T06:14:23Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/1838Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2019-12-10T06:14:23Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 Determinantes da Estrutura de Capital das Empresas que Compõem o Índice Small Caps da B3 |
title |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
spellingShingle |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 Carvalho, Gabriel Augusto de Capital Structure Trade-off Pecking Order. Estrutura de Capital Trade-off Pecking Order. |
title_short |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
title_full |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
title_fullStr |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
title_sort |
Determinants of Capital Structure of Companies that Make up the Small Caps Index of B3 |
author |
Carvalho, Gabriel Augusto de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Gabriel Augusto de Ribeiro, João Eduardo Amaral, Hudson Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, João Eduardo Amaral, Hudson Fernandes |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Gabriel Augusto de Ribeiro, João Eduardo Amaral, Hudson Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Capital Structure Trade-off Pecking Order. Estrutura de Capital Trade-off Pecking Order. |
topic |
Capital Structure Trade-off Pecking Order. Estrutura de Capital Trade-off Pecking Order. |
description |
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the determinants of short-term debt (STD) and long-term debt (LTD) of the companies that make up the B3 SMLL Index in order to identify which theory, trade-off or pecking order better describes the behavior of these companies.Method: Panel data models were used, having as explanatory variables the profitability, risk, size, current liquidity, growth and tangibility of the assets.Relevance: The study stands out by analyzing the adequacy of capital structure theories to the context of smaller capitalization companies listed on the stock exchange of an emerging country.Results: The results showed that the profitability and the current liquidity presented a negative relation with the STD, while the variables size, growth and tangibility presented a positive relation with this variable. In the long run, the variables profitability and tangibility presented a negative relation with the LTD, and the variables risk and size presented a positive relation with this indebtedness measure.Theoretical contributions: The theoretical contribution of the study lies in the fact that, in the short term, pecking order theory was more adequate to describe the choice of indebtedness level, while for long-term indebtedness, there was no predominance of a theory.Contributions to management: In the practical field, the study contributes to point out the relationship between different variables and the decision of indebtedness, which is useful for a more assertive decision-making by investors and managers. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838 10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n2a5 |
url |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n2a5 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838/pdf https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/1838/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 22 n. 2 (2019); 227-242 1984-3925 1984-3925 reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
collection |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jamg.cgg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798315268101898240 |