Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bruni, Adriano Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Texto Completo: https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058
Resumo: Objective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories.
id UNB-21_a871ba1a94945e89be3ac5cdaeb3083d
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3058
network_acronym_str UNB-21
network_name_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository_id_str
spelling Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison SystemDistintos Efeitos da Transparência da Tomada de Decisão no Âmbito do Sistema PrisionalTransparencyDecision-makingPerception of legitimacyPrison SystemTransparênciaTomada de decisãoPercepção de legitimidadeSistema PrisionalObjective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories.Objetivo: Compreender como a preferência do cidadão pode regular os efeitos dos níveis de transparência da tomada de decisão com escolhas conflitantes de políticas públicas no âmbito do Sistema Prisional. Método: Mediante teorias comportamentais, desenvolveu-se um survey experiment tendo como base discursos de parlamentares proferidos na Câmara dos Deputados, relativos à tomada de decisão no âmbito do Sistema Prisional. Os participantes da pesquisa apontaram suas preferências e analisaram a transparência da tomada de decisão promovida por fonte externa, tratando da priorização de duas políticas públicas: adoção de Medidas e Penas Alternativas e a Construção de Mais Presídios. Originalidade/Relevância: Utilização de teorias comportamentais em âmbito nacional para apontar possíveis efeitos positivos e negativos de uma política pública de transparência, indicando produção incremental de conhecimento. Resultados: Ficou demonstrado que os cidadãos tendiam a perceber maior grau de transparência e legitimidade quando suas preferências estavam alinhadas às escolhas realizadas na arena política, revelando limites da transparência promovida e como uma política de transparência pública pode funcionar. Contribuições Teóricas/Metodológicas: Mediante a transparência da tomada de decisão como variável independente, o estudo contribui por demonstrar como o comportamento dos cidadãos pode afetar a percepção da transparência da tomada de decisão no âmbito do Sistema Prisional.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/305810.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 279-310Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 279-3101984-392510.51341/cgg.v26i2reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/810https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/811Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Francisco Marton GleusonBruni, Adriano Leal2024-02-16T12:39:18Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3058Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2024-02-16T12:39:18Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
Distintos Efeitos da Transparência da Tomada de Decisão no Âmbito do Sistema Prisional
title Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
spellingShingle Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson
Transparency
Decision-making
Perception of legitimacy
Prison System
Transparência
Tomada de decisão
Percepção de legitimidade
Sistema Prisional
title_short Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
title_full Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
title_fullStr Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
title_sort Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
author Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson
author_facet Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson
Bruni, Adriano Leal
author_role author
author2 Bruni, Adriano Leal
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson
Bruni, Adriano Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transparency
Decision-making
Perception of legitimacy
Prison System
Transparência
Tomada de decisão
Percepção de legitimidade
Sistema Prisional
topic Transparency
Decision-making
Perception of legitimacy
Prison System
Transparência
Tomada de decisão
Percepção de legitimidade
Sistema Prisional
description Objective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058
10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058
url https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058
identifier_str_mv 10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/810
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/811
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruni
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruni
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 279-310
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 279-310
1984-3925
10.51341/cgg.v26i2
reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
collection Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jamg.cgg@gmail.com
_version_ 1798315266255355904