Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
Texto Completo: | https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058 |
Resumo: | Objective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories. |
id |
UNB-21_a871ba1a94945e89be3ac5cdaeb3083d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3058 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-21 |
network_name_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison SystemDistintos Efeitos da Transparência da Tomada de Decisão no Âmbito do Sistema PrisionalTransparencyDecision-makingPerception of legitimacyPrison SystemTransparênciaTomada de decisãoPercepção de legitimidadeSistema PrisionalObjective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories.Objetivo: Compreender como a preferência do cidadão pode regular os efeitos dos níveis de transparência da tomada de decisão com escolhas conflitantes de políticas públicas no âmbito do Sistema Prisional. Método: Mediante teorias comportamentais, desenvolveu-se um survey experiment tendo como base discursos de parlamentares proferidos na Câmara dos Deputados, relativos à tomada de decisão no âmbito do Sistema Prisional. Os participantes da pesquisa apontaram suas preferências e analisaram a transparência da tomada de decisão promovida por fonte externa, tratando da priorização de duas políticas públicas: adoção de Medidas e Penas Alternativas e a Construção de Mais Presídios. Originalidade/Relevância: Utilização de teorias comportamentais em âmbito nacional para apontar possíveis efeitos positivos e negativos de uma política pública de transparência, indicando produção incremental de conhecimento. Resultados: Ficou demonstrado que os cidadãos tendiam a perceber maior grau de transparência e legitimidade quando suas preferências estavam alinhadas às escolhas realizadas na arena política, revelando limites da transparência promovida e como uma política de transparência pública pode funcionar. Contribuições Teóricas/Metodológicas: Mediante a transparência da tomada de decisão como variável independente, o estudo contribui por demonstrar como o comportamento dos cidadãos pode afetar a percepção da transparência da tomada de decisão no âmbito do Sistema Prisional.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/305810.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 279-310Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 279-3101984-392510.51341/cgg.v26i2reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/810https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/811Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Francisco Marton GleusonBruni, Adriano Leal2024-02-16T12:39:18Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3058Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2024-02-16T12:39:18Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System Distintos Efeitos da Transparência da Tomada de Decisão no Âmbito do Sistema Prisional |
title |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
spellingShingle |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson Transparency Decision-making Perception of legitimacy Prison System Transparência Tomada de decisão Percepção de legitimidade Sistema Prisional |
title_short |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
title_full |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
title_fullStr |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
title_full_unstemmed |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
title_sort |
Distinct Effects of Transparency on Decision-making within the Scope of the Prison System |
author |
Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson |
author_facet |
Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson Bruni, Adriano Leal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bruni, Adriano Leal |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinheiro, Francisco Marton Gleuson Bruni, Adriano Leal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transparency Decision-making Perception of legitimacy Prison System Transparência Tomada de decisão Percepção de legitimidade Sistema Prisional |
topic |
Transparency Decision-making Perception of legitimacy Prison System Transparência Tomada de decisão Percepção de legitimidade Sistema Prisional |
description |
Objective: To understand how the citizen's preferences can regulate the effects of levels of transparency in decision-making with conflicting choices of public policies within the Prison System. Method: Supported by behavioral theories, a survey experiment was developed based on speeches by parliamentarians, given in the Chamber of Deputies, related to decision-making in the Prison System. Research participants pointed out their preferences and analyzed the transparency of decision-making promoted by an external source, prioritizing two public policies: the adoption of Alternative Sanctions and Measures and the Construction of More Prisons. Originality/Relevance: Use of behavioral theories at the national level to point out possible positive and negative effects of a public policy of transparency, indicating incremental production of knowledge. Results: It was demonstrated that citizens tended to perceive a greater degree of transparency and legitimacy when their preferences were aligned with the choices made in the political arena, revealing the limits of the transparency promoted and how a public transparency policy can work. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes by demonstrating situations in which the behavior of citizens can affect the perception of transparency in decision-making within the scope of the Prison System using the transparency of decision-making as an independent variable and behavioral theories. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058 10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058 |
url |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3058 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/810 https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3058/811 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruni info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Marton Gleuson Pinheiro, Adriano Leal Bruni |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 279-310 Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 279-310 1984-3925 10.51341/cgg.v26i2 reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
collection |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jamg.cgg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798315266255355904 |