Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Mariana Azevedo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bonfim, Mariana Pereira, Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio, Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Texto Completo: https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016
Resumo: Objective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control.
id UNB-21_c64f1d67e49b70a8d34037b604980107
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3016
network_acronym_str UNB-21
network_name_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository_id_str
spelling Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public SectorLegibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão no Setor Público BrasileiroRelato IntegradoSetor PúblicoRelatório de GestãoPrestação de ContasLegibilidadeIntegrated ReportPublic sectorManagement reportAccountabilityReadabilityObjective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control.Objetivo: Avaliar a legibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão do setor público brasileiro, dos exercícios de 2016 a 2019, com a mudança estrutural a partir da adoção do modelo de Relato Integrado (RI), em 2018. Método: Com o software R, foi calculada a legibilidade, através do Índice de Legibilidade de Flesch, de 3.720 relatórios emitidos por 930 instituições ao longo de anos. Resultados: Os dados da pesquisa indicaram queda na legibilidade geral dos Relatórios de Gestão ao longo dos anos analisados, e de forma mais expressiva nos exercícios entre 2017 e 2018. Verificou-se também que a adoção do RI, enquanto estruturante do Relatório de Gestão, influenciou em sua concisão, com redução de páginas, palavras, sílabas e sentenças. Originalidade/Relevância: Esse é o primeiro estudo que analisa a legibilidade dos relatórios de todas as instituições públicas brasileiras, especialmente considerando o contexto de adoção do modelo de Relato Integrado. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Os dados apontam que, no setor público, o RI ainda não pode ser apontado, de fato, como um instrumento de governança pública uma vez que ainda é deficiente no sentido de transparência na perspectiva da legibilidade. Entende-se, no entanto, que o conceito de RI, e, mais ainda, sua inserção no setor público brasileiro, é recente, necessitando, portanto, de um tempo para se consolidar. Contribuições sociais/para a gestão: O estudo fornece um diagnóstico aos preparadores sobre como relatórios têm se apresentado, na legibilidade, em comparação com a orientação de serem legíveis, e auxilia no aprimoramento do documento enquanto instrumento de controle social.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/301610.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 213-248Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 213-2481984-392510.51341/cgg.v26i2reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/804https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/805Copyright (c) 2023 Mariana Azevedo Alves, Mariana Pereira Bonfim, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio Silva, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso Soaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Mariana AzevedoBonfim, Mariana PereiraSilva, CésarAugusto TibúrcioSoares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso2024-02-16T12:39:43Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3016Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2024-02-16T12:39:43Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
Legibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão no Setor Público Brasileiro
title Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
spellingShingle Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
Alves, Mariana Azevedo
Relato Integrado
Setor Público
Relatório de Gestão
Prestação de Contas
Legibilidade
Integrated Report
Public sector
Management report
Accountability
Readability
title_short Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
title_full Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
title_fullStr Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
title_full_unstemmed Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
title_sort Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
author Alves, Mariana Azevedo
author_facet Alves, Mariana Azevedo
Bonfim, Mariana Pereira
Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio
Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso
author_role author
author2 Bonfim, Mariana Pereira
Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio
Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Mariana Azevedo
Bonfim, Mariana Pereira
Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio
Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Relato Integrado
Setor Público
Relatório de Gestão
Prestação de Contas
Legibilidade
Integrated Report
Public sector
Management report
Accountability
Readability
topic Relato Integrado
Setor Público
Relatório de Gestão
Prestação de Contas
Legibilidade
Integrated Report
Public sector
Management report
Accountability
Readability
description Objective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016
10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016
url https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016
identifier_str_mv 10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/804
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/805
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 213-248
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 213-248
1984-3925
10.51341/cgg.v26i2
reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
collection Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jamg.cgg@gmail.com
_version_ 1798315266231238656