Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
Texto Completo: | https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016 |
Resumo: | Objective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control. |
id |
UNB-21_c64f1d67e49b70a8d34037b604980107 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3016 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-21 |
network_name_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public SectorLegibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão no Setor Público BrasileiroRelato IntegradoSetor PúblicoRelatório de GestãoPrestação de ContasLegibilidadeIntegrated ReportPublic sectorManagement reportAccountabilityReadabilityObjective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control.Objetivo: Avaliar a legibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão do setor público brasileiro, dos exercícios de 2016 a 2019, com a mudança estrutural a partir da adoção do modelo de Relato Integrado (RI), em 2018. Método: Com o software R, foi calculada a legibilidade, através do Índice de Legibilidade de Flesch, de 3.720 relatórios emitidos por 930 instituições ao longo de anos. Resultados: Os dados da pesquisa indicaram queda na legibilidade geral dos Relatórios de Gestão ao longo dos anos analisados, e de forma mais expressiva nos exercícios entre 2017 e 2018. Verificou-se também que a adoção do RI, enquanto estruturante do Relatório de Gestão, influenciou em sua concisão, com redução de páginas, palavras, sílabas e sentenças. Originalidade/Relevância: Esse é o primeiro estudo que analisa a legibilidade dos relatórios de todas as instituições públicas brasileiras, especialmente considerando o contexto de adoção do modelo de Relato Integrado. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Os dados apontam que, no setor público, o RI ainda não pode ser apontado, de fato, como um instrumento de governança pública uma vez que ainda é deficiente no sentido de transparência na perspectiva da legibilidade. Entende-se, no entanto, que o conceito de RI, e, mais ainda, sua inserção no setor público brasileiro, é recente, necessitando, portanto, de um tempo para se consolidar. Contribuições sociais/para a gestão: O estudo fornece um diagnóstico aos preparadores sobre como relatórios têm se apresentado, na legibilidade, em comparação com a orientação de serem legíveis, e auxilia no aprimoramento do documento enquanto instrumento de controle social.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/301610.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 213-248Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 213-2481984-392510.51341/cgg.v26i2reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/804https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/805Copyright (c) 2023 Mariana Azevedo Alves, Mariana Pereira Bonfim, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio Silva, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso Soaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Mariana AzevedoBonfim, Mariana PereiraSilva, CésarAugusto TibúrcioSoares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso2024-02-16T12:39:43Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/3016Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2024-02-16T12:39:43Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector Legibilidade dos Relatórios de Gestão no Setor Público Brasileiro |
title |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
spellingShingle |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector Alves, Mariana Azevedo Relato Integrado Setor Público Relatório de Gestão Prestação de Contas Legibilidade Integrated Report Public sector Management report Accountability Readability |
title_short |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
title_full |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
title_fullStr |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
title_full_unstemmed |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
title_sort |
Readability of Management Reports in the Brazilian Public Sector |
author |
Alves, Mariana Azevedo |
author_facet |
Alves, Mariana Azevedo Bonfim, Mariana Pereira Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bonfim, Mariana Pereira Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Mariana Azevedo Bonfim, Mariana Pereira Silva, CésarAugusto Tibúrcio Soares, José Mauro Madeiros Velôso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Relato Integrado Setor Público Relatório de Gestão Prestação de Contas Legibilidade Integrated Report Public sector Management report Accountability Readability |
topic |
Relato Integrado Setor Público Relatório de Gestão Prestação de Contas Legibilidade Integrated Report Public sector Management report Accountability Readability |
description |
Objective: Evaluate the readability of the Management Reports of the Brazilian public sector, from the years 2016 to 2019, with the structural change from the adoption of the Integrated Reporting (IR) model, in 2018. Method: Using the R software, readability was calculated using the Flesch Readability Index of 3,720 reports issued by 930 institutions over the years. Results: The research data indicated a decrease in the general readability of the Management Reports over the years analyzed, and more expressively in the years between 2017 and 2018. It was also verified that the adoption of the IR, while structuring the Management Report, influenced its conciseness, reducing pages, words, syllables and sentences. Originality/Relevance: This is the first study that analyzes the readability of reports from all Brazilian public institutions, especially considering the context in which the Integrated Reporting model was adopted. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The data indicate that, in the public sector, the IR cannot yet be pointed out, in fact, as an instrument of public governance since it is still deficient in the sense of transparency from the perspective of readability. It is understood, however, that the concept of IR, and, even more, its insertion in the Brazilian public sector, is recent, therefore needing some time to consolidate. Social/Management Contributions: The study provides a diagnosis to preparers on how reports have been presented, in terms of readability, in comparison with the orientation of being readable, and helps to improve the document as an instrument of social control. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016 10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016 |
url |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51341/cgg.v26i2.3016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/804 https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/3016/805 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade Gestão e Governança |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023); 213-248 Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 26 n. 2 (2023); 213-248 1984-3925 10.51341/cgg.v26i2 reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
collection |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jamg.cgg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798315266231238656 |