Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Aguiar Rodrigues, Matheus Vinícius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Direito.Unb (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862
Resumo: This article seeks to expose an institutional incapacity of the Judiciary, which is a supposed power to control fake news in the Brazilian democracy. In order to do so, at first, we present the main reasons that stimulate and contribute to the resurgence of this social phenomenon, indicating, on the one hand, an architecture that facilitates the dissemination of fraudulent news (echo chambers and filter bubbles) and, for another, a user cognitively predisposed to share it (motivated reasoning account of fake news). In a second moment, when presenting the phenomenon as a legal fact, it is sought to present the main statutes that give rise to the repressive judicial action, that is not able to follow the hyper-speed of propagation of this fraudulent news. Finally, in exposing this institutional incapacity, it is argued that, while limited in its typical function, the Judiciary has little to contribute to the debate. Nevertheless, it is argued that the Judiciary can stimulate public and institutional debates for multisectoral solutions in the regulation and fight against this phenomenon, maintaining, therefore, the hygiene of fundamental democratic values ”‹”‹in a period of democratic recession.
id UNB-24_06885c08e4a0a18262a80100d67a8c21
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26862
network_acronym_str UNB-24
network_name_str Direito.Unb (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information agePara além do judiciário: o controle judicial da 'fake news' na era da informaçãoFake newsControle JudicialPolíticas PúblicasCapacidade institucionalFake newsJudicial ControlPublic PolicyInstitutional capacityThis article seeks to expose an institutional incapacity of the Judiciary, which is a supposed power to control fake news in the Brazilian democracy. In order to do so, at first, we present the main reasons that stimulate and contribute to the resurgence of this social phenomenon, indicating, on the one hand, an architecture that facilitates the dissemination of fraudulent news (echo chambers and filter bubbles) and, for another, a user cognitively predisposed to share it (motivated reasoning account of fake news). In a second moment, when presenting the phenomenon as a legal fact, it is sought to present the main statutes that give rise to the repressive judicial action, that is not able to follow the hyper-speed of propagation of this fraudulent news. Finally, in exposing this institutional incapacity, it is argued that, while limited in its typical function, the Judiciary has little to contribute to the debate. Nevertheless, it is argued that the Judiciary can stimulate public and institutional debates for multisectoral solutions in the regulation and fight against this phenomenon, maintaining, therefore, the hygiene of fundamental democratic values ”‹”‹in a period of democratic recession.Esse artigo busca expor uma incapacidade do Poder Judiciário, qual seja um suposto poder de controlar judicialmente o fenômeno da fake news na democracia brasileira. Para isso, em um primeiro momento, busca-se apresentar as principais razões que estimulam e concorrem ao recrudescimento desse fenômeno social, indicando, por um lado, uma arquitetura que propicia a disseminação de notícias fraudulentas (echo chambers e filter bubbles) e, por outro, um usuário predisposto cognitivamente a compartilhá-la (motivated reasoning account of fake news). Em um segundo momento, ao apresentar o fenômeno enquanto um fato jurídico, busca-se apresentar as principais legislações que dão ensejo a atuação repressiva judicial, não sendo esta capaz de acompanhar a hipervelocidade de propagação dessas notícias fraudulentas. Ao fim, ao expor essa incapacidade institucional, defende-se que, enquanto limitado em sua função típica, o Poder Judiciário tem pouco a contribuir ao debate. Não obstante, defende-se que o Poder Judiciário pode estimular debates públicos e institucionais para soluções multisetoriais na regulação e no combate a esse fenômeno, mantendo, por conseguinte, a higidez de valores democráticos fundamentais num período de recessão democrática. FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 3 Nr. 1 (2019): September - Dezember; 89-112Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): September - December; 89-112Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2019): Septiembre - Diciembre; 89-112Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Septembre - Décembre; 89-112Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 3 n. 1 (2019): Setembro - Dezembro; 89-1122357-8009reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862/24502Copyright (c) 2019 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasíliahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Fonseca, Reynaldo SoaresAguiar Rodrigues, Matheus Vinícius 2023-11-09T02:19:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26862Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/oairevistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br2357-80092318-9908opendoar:2023-11-09T02:19:17Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
Para além do judiciário: o controle judicial da 'fake news' na era da informação
title Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
spellingShingle Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
da Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares
Fake news
Controle Judicial
Políticas Públicas
Capacidade institucional
Fake news
Judicial Control
Public Policy
Institutional capacity
title_short Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
title_full Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
title_fullStr Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
title_full_unstemmed Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
title_sort Beyond the judiciary: fake news judicial control in the information age
author da Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares
author_facet da Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares
Aguiar Rodrigues, Matheus Vinícius
author_role author
author2 Aguiar Rodrigues, Matheus Vinícius
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Fonseca, Reynaldo Soares
Aguiar Rodrigues, Matheus Vinícius
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fake news
Controle Judicial
Políticas Públicas
Capacidade institucional
Fake news
Judicial Control
Public Policy
Institutional capacity
topic Fake news
Controle Judicial
Políticas Públicas
Capacidade institucional
Fake news
Judicial Control
Public Policy
Institutional capacity
description This article seeks to expose an institutional incapacity of the Judiciary, which is a supposed power to control fake news in the Brazilian democracy. In order to do so, at first, we present the main reasons that stimulate and contribute to the resurgence of this social phenomenon, indicating, on the one hand, an architecture that facilitates the dissemination of fraudulent news (echo chambers and filter bubbles) and, for another, a user cognitively predisposed to share it (motivated reasoning account of fake news). In a second moment, when presenting the phenomenon as a legal fact, it is sought to present the main statutes that give rise to the repressive judicial action, that is not able to follow the hyper-speed of propagation of this fraudulent news. Finally, in exposing this institutional incapacity, it is argued that, while limited in its typical function, the Judiciary has little to contribute to the debate. Nevertheless, it is argued that the Judiciary can stimulate public and institutional debates for multisectoral solutions in the regulation and fight against this phenomenon, maintaining, therefore, the hygiene of fundamental democratic values ”‹”‹in a period of democratic recession.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/26862/24502
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 3 Nr. 1 (2019): September - Dezember; 89-112
Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): September - December; 89-112
Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2019): Septiembre - Diciembre; 89-112
Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Septembre - Décembre; 89-112
Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 3 n. 1 (2019): Setembro - Dezembro; 89-112
2357-8009
reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Direito.Unb (Online)
collection Direito.Unb (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br
_version_ 1796797431571021824

Registros relacionados