The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Direito.Unb (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545 |
Resumo: | In current Brazilian constitutional debate there may be no subject that has generated as many publications as that of constitutional principles. Many of these publications, however, are a mere repetition of what has been written before. The publication of Marcelo Neves' book ”Entre Hídra e Hércules" is certainly an exception in this scenario. It brings new light to the debate and proposes a change of course. In this shorte Article, I defend my views against the objections Neves raises to some of my ideas in his book to show that his objections are unsound and that he does not in fact offer an alternative to what he calls "still dominant models". -------------------------------- I would like to thank Conrado Hübner Mendes, Josecleyton Geraldo da Silva, Rafael de Lima and Fernando Leal for their comments on a draft of this Article. Article translated to English by Teo Pastor and reviewed by the author. |
id |
UNB-24_d4df43dc33279da9d75fb8daca3fa7ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24545 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-24 |
network_name_str |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimizationO supremo tribunal precisa de Iolau: resposta à s objeções de Marcelo Neves ao sopesamento e à otimizaçãoMarcelo NevesPrincípios JurídicosRegras JurídicasDireito ConstitucionalSupremo Tribunal FederalMarcelo NevesLegal PrinciplesLegal RulesConstitutional LawBrazilian Supreme CourtIn current Brazilian constitutional debate there may be no subject that has generated as many publications as that of constitutional principles. Many of these publications, however, are a mere repetition of what has been written before. The publication of Marcelo Neves' book ”Entre Hídra e Hércules" is certainly an exception in this scenario. It brings new light to the debate and proposes a change of course. In this shorte Article, I defend my views against the objections Neves raises to some of my ideas in his book to show that his objections are unsound and that he does not in fact offer an alternative to what he calls "still dominant models". -------------------------------- I would like to thank Conrado Hübner Mendes, Josecleyton Geraldo da Silva, Rafael de Lima and Fernando Leal for their comments on a draft of this Article. Article translated to English by Teo Pastor and reviewed by the author.Talvez não exista, no direito constitucional brasileiro atual, um debate que tenha gerado uma produção tão intensa quanto aquele sobre princípios constitucionais. Muito dessa produção, contudo, é mera reprodução do que já foi escrito antes. O recente livro de Marcelo Neves, Entre Hidra e Hércules, é com certeza uma exceção nesse cenário. Ele traz novas luzes ao debate e propõe mudanças de rumos. Neste breve artigo, pretendo defender minhas ideias em face das objeções que o autor suscita, para mostrar que ele, de um lado, não tem razão nessas objeções e, de outro, não oferece de fato uma alternativa à quilo que ele chama de "modelos ainda dominantes". ------------------------------ Agradeço a Conrado Hübner Mendes, Josecleyton Geraldo da Silva, Rafael Bellem de Lima e Fernando Leal pela leitura crítica das versões preliminares deste texto. Artigo traduzido para o inglês por Teo Pastor e revisto pelo autor.FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-1182357-8009reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545/21742https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545/21743Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasíliahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Virgílio Afonso2023-11-09T02:18:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24545Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/oairevistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br2357-80092318-9908opendoar:2023-11-09T02:18:50Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization O supremo tribunal precisa de Iolau: resposta à s objeções de Marcelo Neves ao sopesamento e à otimização |
title |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
spellingShingle |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization da Silva, Virgílio Afonso Marcelo Neves Princípios Jurídicos Regras Jurídicas Direito Constitucional Supremo Tribunal Federal Marcelo Neves Legal Principles Legal Rules Constitutional Law Brazilian Supreme Court |
title_short |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
title_full |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
title_fullStr |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
title_sort |
The Brazilian Supreme Court needs Iolaus: a reply to Marcelo Neves' objections to balancing and optimization |
author |
da Silva, Virgílio Afonso |
author_facet |
da Silva, Virgílio Afonso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Virgílio Afonso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Marcelo Neves Princípios Jurídicos Regras Jurídicas Direito Constitucional Supremo Tribunal Federal Marcelo Neves Legal Principles Legal Rules Constitutional Law Brazilian Supreme Court |
topic |
Marcelo Neves Princípios Jurídicos Regras Jurídicas Direito Constitucional Supremo Tribunal Federal Marcelo Neves Legal Principles Legal Rules Constitutional Law Brazilian Supreme Court |
description |
In current Brazilian constitutional debate there may be no subject that has generated as many publications as that of constitutional principles. Many of these publications, however, are a mere repetition of what has been written before. The publication of Marcelo Neves' book ”Entre Hídra e Hércules" is certainly an exception in this scenario. It brings new light to the debate and proposes a change of course. In this shorte Article, I defend my views against the objections Neves raises to some of my ideas in his book to show that his objections are unsound and that he does not in fact offer an alternative to what he calls "still dominant models". -------------------------------- I would like to thank Conrado Hübner Mendes, Josecleyton Geraldo da Silva, Rafael de Lima and Fernando Leal for their comments on a draft of this Article. Article translated to English by Teo Pastor and reviewed by the author. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545/21742 https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24545/21743 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118 Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118 Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118 Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 96-118 2357-8009 reponame:Direito.Unb (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
collection |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br |
_version_ |
1796797431516495872 |