Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | P@ranoá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/10781 |
Resumo: | This paper discusses the implementation of Large Urban Projects (LUPs). By generating clear impacts in the urban network, by assembling large amounts of financial resources, and by involving several agents with equally distinctive interests, LUPs are submitted to constant social, economical, and political scrutiny, as well as to routine project analysis. This paper is grounded on works by several researchers who regard LUPs from varying perspectives, all of which give priority to the understanding made public by print media that was contemporary to Haussmann’s works in late nineteenth-century Paris. The present analysis is based on three main assumptions: 1) the traditional, current critique of LUPs has also been verified in the past, exposing a set of intrinsic and controversial features in these projects which can be found in different locations; 2) the LUP debate is often extremist and rejects conciliatory approaches; and 3) from the point of view of a distant observer, LUPs are generally regarded as positive, probably due to the monumentality appeal; from the point of view of a close observer, they are generally regarded as problematic. The material included articles from The New York Times which discuss Haussmann’s works on the so-called modernization of Paris. The ensuing debate and conclusion are grounded on these sources and confirm the assumptions outlined. |
id |
UNB-28_df6ceb3c00335fee23a5dbc373e0b044 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10781 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-28 |
network_name_str |
P@ranoá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do pertoGrandes projetos urbanosArquitetura imagéticaGentrificaçãoHaussmannLarge urban projectIconographicArchitectureGentrificationHaussmannThis paper discusses the implementation of Large Urban Projects (LUPs). By generating clear impacts in the urban network, by assembling large amounts of financial resources, and by involving several agents with equally distinctive interests, LUPs are submitted to constant social, economical, and political scrutiny, as well as to routine project analysis. This paper is grounded on works by several researchers who regard LUPs from varying perspectives, all of which give priority to the understanding made public by print media that was contemporary to Haussmann’s works in late nineteenth-century Paris. The present analysis is based on three main assumptions: 1) the traditional, current critique of LUPs has also been verified in the past, exposing a set of intrinsic and controversial features in these projects which can be found in different locations; 2) the LUP debate is often extremist and rejects conciliatory approaches; and 3) from the point of view of a distant observer, LUPs are generally regarded as positive, probably due to the monumentality appeal; from the point of view of a close observer, they are generally regarded as problematic. The material included articles from The New York Times which discuss Haussmann’s works on the so-called modernization of Paris. The ensuing debate and conclusion are grounded on these sources and confirm the assumptions outlined.Discute-se aqui a explicitação de entendimentossobre a implantação de Grandes ProjetosUrbanos (GPUs). Por gerarem impactos ostensivosna malha urbana, por reunirem grandessomas de recursos financeiros e por envolveremdiversos agentes com interesses igualmente diversos,os GPUs são submetidos à constanteanálise social, econômica e política, além do escrutínioprojetual de praxe. O artigo fundamenta-se em estudos dos seus autores sobre diferentesperspectivas assumidas perante os GPUs; aqui,os autores priorizam o entendimento de umaseleção da mídia impressa e contemporânea à sobras de Haussmann, em Paris, da segunda metadedo século XIX. O artigo parte de três pressupostos:(I) a tradicional crítica hoje observadaem relação a essas grandes intervenções urbanasjá era observada em momentos pretéritos,indicando assim um conjunto de característicasque lhes são intrínsecas e polêmicas, ainda queem geografias distintas; (II) o debate sobre GPUsé, por mais das vezes, extremado e não permitenuanças; e (III) na análise do observador distante,a apologia prevalece, talvez sugerida pelasqualidades da monumentalidade; já na análisedaquele que lhe é próximo, persiste a crítica severa.O material utilizado foi uma seleção de artigosdo jornal The New York Times que discutem asobras da chamada modernização de Paris, soba responsabilidade de Haussmann. O debate e aconclusão se fundamentam sobre esse materiale reiteram os pressupostos adotados.Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2014-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/1078110.18830/issn.1679-0944.n13.2014.12045Paranoá; Vol. 7 No. 13 (2014): Tempos e Escalas da Cidade e do Urbanismo; 37-44Paranoá; v. 7 n. 13 (2014): Tempos e Escalas da Cidade e do Urbanismo; 37-441679-09441677-7395reponame:P@ranoáinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/10781/9473Ultramari, ClovisCiffoni, Ana Luciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-07T13:28:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10781Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoaPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/oaiparanoa@unb.br1679-09441677-7395opendoar:2024-02-07T13:28:08P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
title |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
spellingShingle |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto Ultramari, Clovis Grandes projetos urbanos Arquitetura imagética Gentrificação Haussmann Large urban project Iconographic Architecture Gentrification Haussmann |
title_short |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
title_full |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
title_fullStr |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
title_sort |
Grandes projetos urbanos: a apologia do distante e o receio do perto |
author |
Ultramari, Clovis |
author_facet |
Ultramari, Clovis Ciffoni, Ana Lucia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ciffoni, Ana Lucia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ultramari, Clovis Ciffoni, Ana Lucia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Grandes projetos urbanos Arquitetura imagética Gentrificação Haussmann Large urban project Iconographic Architecture Gentrification Haussmann |
topic |
Grandes projetos urbanos Arquitetura imagética Gentrificação Haussmann Large urban project Iconographic Architecture Gentrification Haussmann |
description |
This paper discusses the implementation of Large Urban Projects (LUPs). By generating clear impacts in the urban network, by assembling large amounts of financial resources, and by involving several agents with equally distinctive interests, LUPs are submitted to constant social, economical, and political scrutiny, as well as to routine project analysis. This paper is grounded on works by several researchers who regard LUPs from varying perspectives, all of which give priority to the understanding made public by print media that was contemporary to Haussmann’s works in late nineteenth-century Paris. The present analysis is based on three main assumptions: 1) the traditional, current critique of LUPs has also been verified in the past, exposing a set of intrinsic and controversial features in these projects which can be found in different locations; 2) the LUP debate is often extremist and rejects conciliatory approaches; and 3) from the point of view of a distant observer, LUPs are generally regarded as positive, probably due to the monumentality appeal; from the point of view of a close observer, they are generally regarded as problematic. The material included articles from The New York Times which discuss Haussmann’s works on the so-called modernization of Paris. The ensuing debate and conclusion are grounded on these sources and confirm the assumptions outlined. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/10781 10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n13.2014.12045 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/10781 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n13.2014.12045 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/10781/9473 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paranoá; Vol. 7 No. 13 (2014): Tempos e Escalas da Cidade e do Urbanismo; 37-44 Paranoá; v. 7 n. 13 (2014): Tempos e Escalas da Cidade e do Urbanismo; 37-44 1679-0944 1677-7395 reponame:P@ranoá instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
P@ranoá |
collection |
P@ranoá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
paranoa@unb.br |
_version_ |
1797066978991538176 |