THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044
Resumo: Research has shown that the comparatively poorlevels of performance observed among children and adults in syllogisticproblems are attributable not to a lack of reasoning competence,but are related to the content of the premises, as well as tothe different forms of syllogistic problems. In this study subjectsfrom 7 to 14 years of age were more accurate in dealing withproblems with content that agreed with their everyday experience,than with that which contradicted it. Children performed muchworse on problems involving invalid inferences (Affirmation ofConsequent and Denial of Antecedent) than on problems involvingvalid inferences (Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens), replicatingDias (1987) findings among adults
id UNB-4_56f0c34449c8fda0119591e7d7ed87f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17044
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDRENA Compreensão De Silogismos Em CriançasResearch has shown that the comparatively poorlevels of performance observed among children and adults in syllogisticproblems are attributable not to a lack of reasoning competence,but are related to the content of the premises, as well as tothe different forms of syllogistic problems. In this study subjectsfrom 7 to 14 years of age were more accurate in dealing withproblems with content that agreed with their everyday experience,than with that which contradicted it. Children performed muchworse on problems involving invalid inferences (Affirmation ofConsequent and Denial of Antecedent) than on problems involvingvalid inferences (Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens), replicatingDias (1987) findings among adultsRESUMO - Pesquisas tem demonstrado que os baixos níveis de desempenho encontrados entre crianças e adultos em problemas silogísticos são devidos não à falta de competência em raciocinar, porém aos conteúdos das premisas como também às diferentes formas de silogismos. No presente estudo, sujeitos de 7 a 14 anos de idade obtiveram melhores resultados nos problemas que envolviam fatos que concordavam com suas experiências diárias do que com os fatos que contradiziam estas experiências. Nos problemas envolvendo inferências inválidas (Afirmação do Conseqüente e Negação do Antecedente) o desempenho das crianças foi muito inferior ao alcançado nos problemas que envolviam inferências válidas (Modus Ponens e Modus Tollens), replicando os resultados encontrados por Dias (1987) entre adultos.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2012-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 No. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 Núm. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 No. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 4 n. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-1691806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044/15353https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044/15530Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-15T23:11:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17044Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-10-15T23:11:17Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
A Compreensão De Silogismos Em Crianças
title THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
spellingShingle THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.
title_short THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
title_full THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
title_fullStr THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
title_full_unstemmed THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
title_sort THE UNDERSTANDING OF SYLLOGISMS IN CHILDREN
author Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.
author_facet Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Maria da Graça B.B.
description Research has shown that the comparatively poorlevels of performance observed among children and adults in syllogisticproblems are attributable not to a lack of reasoning competence,but are related to the content of the premises, as well as tothe different forms of syllogistic problems. In this study subjectsfrom 7 to 14 years of age were more accurate in dealing withproblems with content that agreed with their everyday experience,than with that which contradicted it. Children performed muchworse on problems involving invalid inferences (Affirmation ofConsequent and Denial of Antecedent) than on problems involvingvalid inferences (Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens), replicatingDias (1987) findings among adults
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-07-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044/15353
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17044/15530
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 No. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 Núm. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 4 No. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 4 n. 2: Revista Psicologia Teoria e pesquisa; 156-169
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211710428053504