CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124 |
Resumo: | Answers of 60 fifth graders to literal and relative versions ofproblems on fractions revealed a strong tendency to identify thenumerator as denoting literally the number of marked elements and thedenominator as denoting the total number of elements (literal version). Onthe whole students did not accept as valid descriptors of a fraction n/mfigures which did not include, literally, n marked elements in a total of m,even when the relationship between number of marked elements and totalnumber of elements was the same as that in n and m (relative version).Findings are discussed in terms of the concept of relative magnitude. |
id |
UNB-4_687c52821988e051e479dbdd0ac0bdbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17124 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-4 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDEA compreensão de frações como magnitude relativaProblemasFraçõesMagnitude relativaProblemsFractionsRelative magnitudeAnswers of 60 fifth graders to literal and relative versions ofproblems on fractions revealed a strong tendency to identify thenumerator as denoting literally the number of marked elements and thedenominator as denoting the total number of elements (literal version). Onthe whole students did not accept as valid descriptors of a fraction n/mfigures which did not include, literally, n marked elements in a total of m,even when the relationship between number of marked elements and totalnumber of elements was the same as that in n and m (relative version).Findings are discussed in terms of the concept of relative magnitude.A análise das respostas dadas por 60 alunos de quinta série a problemas apresentados em duas versões (uma literal, outra relativa) revelou uma forte tendência a identificar o numerador e o denominador como indicando, respectivamente, o número de elementos marcados e o número total de elementos em um conjunto (versão literal). Em geral os alunos não aceitavam como válidas figuras que não preenchiam estes critérios, mesmo quando as figuras representavam frações equivalentes (versão relativa). Os resultados são discutidos em termo do conceito de magnitude relativa.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2012-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 Núm. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 8 n. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-781806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124/15433https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124/15610Carraher, David WilliamSchliemann, Analúcia Diasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-16T18:18:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17124Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-10-16T18:18:46Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE A compreensão de frações como magnitude relativa |
title |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
spellingShingle |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE Carraher, David William Problemas Frações Magnitude relativa Problems Fractions Relative magnitude |
title_short |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
title_full |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
title_fullStr |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
title_sort |
CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF FRACTIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF RELATIVE MAGNITUDE |
author |
Carraher, David William |
author_facet |
Carraher, David William Schliemann, Analúcia Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schliemann, Analúcia Dias |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carraher, David William Schliemann, Analúcia Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Problemas Frações Magnitude relativa Problems Fractions Relative magnitude |
topic |
Problemas Frações Magnitude relativa Problems Fractions Relative magnitude |
description |
Answers of 60 fifth graders to literal and relative versions ofproblems on fractions revealed a strong tendency to identify thenumerator as denoting literally the number of marked elements and thedenominator as denoting the total number of elements (literal version). Onthe whole students did not accept as valid descriptors of a fraction n/mfigures which did not include, literally, n marked elements in a total of m,even when the relationship between number of marked elements and totalnumber of elements was the same as that in n and m (relative version).Findings are discussed in terms of the concept of relative magnitude. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124/15433 https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17124/15610 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 Núm. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 8 n. 1: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 67-78 1806-3446 0102-3772 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaptp@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800211710872649728 |