Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585 |
Resumo: | Although the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country. |
id |
UNB-4_b53e1c67400cc3c6e043935a1f7669da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20585 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-4 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological IssuesValidade do TAT no Brasil: Questões Teóricas e MetodológicasTeste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testesThematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validityAlthough the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country.Apesar da popularidade do Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT) no Brasil, a demonstração de evidências de sua validade ainda permanece um desafio. No presente artigo, discutimos essa questão problematizando a definição do TAT como método projetivo e teste psicológico, abordando seu uso por diferentes correntes teóricas, relações entre os níveis nomotético e idiográfico de análise, limitações da Teoria Clássica dos Testes para avaliar suas propriedades, bem como os desafios na pesquisa e prática com o instrumento no país. Defendemos que superar a visão tradicional sobre as técnicas projetivas, utilizar métodos multidimensionais e realizar estudos empíricos mais amplos (sejam normativos ou de validação, usando bancos de dados multicêntricos) pode assegurar práticas melhor informadas com o instrumento para pesquisadores e profissionais.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2021-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/2058510.1590/0102.3772e36521 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 (2020)1806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585/29163Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScaduto, Alessandro AntonioBarbieri, ValériaSantos, Manoel Antônio dos2021-04-01T14:01:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20585Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2021-04-01T14:01:58Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues Validade do TAT no Brasil: Questões Teóricas e Metodológicas |
title |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
spellingShingle |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity |
title_short |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
title_full |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
title_fullStr |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
title_sort |
Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues |
author |
Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio |
author_facet |
Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio Barbieri, Valéria Santos, Manoel Antônio dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbieri, Valéria Santos, Manoel Antônio dos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio Barbieri, Valéria Santos, Manoel Antônio dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity |
topic |
Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity |
description |
Although the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585 10.1590/0102.3772e36521 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0102.3772e36521 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585/29163 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020) Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020) Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020) Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 (2020) 1806-3446 0102-3772 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaptp@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800211714379087872 |