Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Barbieri, Valéria, Santos, Manoel Antônio dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585
Resumo: Although the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country.
id UNB-4_b53e1c67400cc3c6e043935a1f7669da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20585
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological IssuesValidade do TAT no Brasil: Questões Teóricas e MetodológicasTeste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testesThematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validityAlthough the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country.Apesar da popularidade do Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT) no Brasil, a demonstração de evidências de sua validade ainda permanece um desafio. No presente artigo, discutimos essa questão problematizando a definição do TAT como método projetivo e teste psicológico, abordando seu uso por diferentes correntes teóricas, relações entre os níveis nomotético e idiográfico de análise, limitações da Teoria Clássica dos Testes para avaliar suas propriedades, bem como os desafios na pesquisa e prática com o instrumento no país. Defendemos que superar a visão tradicional sobre as técnicas projetivas, utilizar métodos multidimensionais e realizar estudos empíricos mais amplos (sejam normativos ou de validação, usando bancos de dados multicêntricos) pode assegurar práticas melhor informadas com o instrumento para pesquisadores e profissionais.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2021-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/2058510.1590/0102.3772e36521 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 (2020)1806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585/29163Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScaduto, Alessandro AntonioBarbieri, ValériaSantos, Manoel Antônio dos2021-04-01T14:01:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20585Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2021-04-01T14:01:58Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Validade do TAT no Brasil: Questões Teóricas e Metodológicas
title Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
spellingShingle Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio
Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity
title_short Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
title_full Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
title_fullStr Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
title_sort Validity of the TAT in Brazil: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
author Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio
author_facet Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio
Barbieri, Valéria
Santos, Manoel Antônio dos
author_role author
author2 Barbieri, Valéria
Santos, Manoel Antônio dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scaduto, Alessandro Antonio
Barbieri, Valéria
Santos, Manoel Antônio dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity
topic Teste de Apercepção Temática (TAT), Técnicas projetivas, Validade dos testes
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Projective techniques, Test validity
description Although the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is popular in Brazil, showing evidences of its validity remains a challenge. In the present article, we discuss such issue by analyzing the definition of the TAT as a projective method and a psychological test, its use by different theoretical traditions, relations between nomothetic and idiographic analysis levels, limitations of Classical Test Theory for evaluating the instrument’s properties, and challenges regarding research and practice with the instrument in Brazil. We advocate that overcoming a traditional view of projective techniques, using multidimensional methods and performing wider empirical studies on norms and validation evidences with multicenter databases may allow more secure and informed practices with the instrument among researchers and practitioners in the country.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585
10.1590/0102.3772e36521
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0102.3772e36521
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/20585/29163
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santos
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandro Antonio Scaduto, Valéria Barbieri, Manoel Antônio dos Santos
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 (2020)
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211714379087872