Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cunha de Oliveira, Tiago, Bandeira, Denise Ruschel, Frank Krueger, Robert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521
Resumo: The alternative model of personality disorders introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders provides a diagnostic system that is expected to correspond to the well-known categorical approach of personality disorder diagnoses. The current study aims to improve knowledge about the relationship between pathological personality traits and their corresponding personality types. A Brazilian sample of 1,162 people took part in this study. The results point to some level of continuity between the two models when the variables were treated as dimensional. Contrariwise, there is a lack of strong scientific evidence to justify the maintenance of the categorical approach. We recommend the exclusion of the categorical approach from personality disorder diagnosis systems.
id UNB-4_d76cd6255b7d35a5a4fd073b096b6bab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27521
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?Tipos e Traços de Personalidade no DSM-5: Eles Realmente Combinam?Categorical model, Dimensional model, Personality disorder diagnosisModelo categórico, Modelo dimensional, Diagnóstico de transtorno da personalidadeThe alternative model of personality disorders introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders provides a diagnostic system that is expected to correspond to the well-known categorical approach of personality disorder diagnoses. The current study aims to improve knowledge about the relationship between pathological personality traits and their corresponding personality types. A Brazilian sample of 1,162 people took part in this study. The results point to some level of continuity between the two models when the variables were treated as dimensional. Contrariwise, there is a lack of strong scientific evidence to justify the maintenance of the categorical approach. We recommend the exclusion of the categorical approach from personality disorder diagnosis systems.O modelo alternativo de transtornos da personalidade introduzido na quinta edição do Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais oferece um sistema diagnóstico que supostamente deve corresponder ao bem conhecido modelo de diagnóstico categórico dos transtornos da personalidade. O presente estudo tem por objetivo incrementar os conhecimentos sobre a relação entre os traços de personalidade e seus correspondentes tipos de personalidade. Uma amostra brasileira de 1.162 pessoas participou deste estudo. Os resultados indicaram algum nível de continuidade entre os dois modelos quando as variáveis foram consideradas dimensionais. Por outro lado, existe uma falta de evidência científica que justifique a manutenção da abordagem categórica. Recomenda-se a exclusão da abordagem categórica de sistemas diagnósticos de transtornos da personalidade.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2020-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/2752110.1590/0102.3772e36nspe15 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. Especial (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 Núm. Especial (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. Especial (2020)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 n. Especial (2020)1806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521/28824https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521/33788Copyright (c) 2020 Sérgio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira, Tiago Cunha de Oliveira, Denise Ruschel Bandeira, Robert Frank Kruegerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva de Oliveira, Sérgio EduardoCunha de Oliveira, TiagoBandeira, Denise RuschelFrank Krueger, Robert2022-07-20T16:53:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27521Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2022-07-20T16:53:15Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
Tipos e Traços de Personalidade no DSM-5: Eles Realmente Combinam?
title Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
spellingShingle Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
Silva de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo
Categorical model, Dimensional model, Personality disorder diagnosis
Modelo categórico, Modelo dimensional, Diagnóstico de transtorno da personalidade
title_short Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
title_full Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
title_fullStr Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
title_full_unstemmed Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
title_sort Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match?
author Silva de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo
author_facet Silva de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo
Cunha de Oliveira, Tiago
Bandeira, Denise Ruschel
Frank Krueger, Robert
author_role author
author2 Cunha de Oliveira, Tiago
Bandeira, Denise Ruschel
Frank Krueger, Robert
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo
Cunha de Oliveira, Tiago
Bandeira, Denise Ruschel
Frank Krueger, Robert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Categorical model, Dimensional model, Personality disorder diagnosis
Modelo categórico, Modelo dimensional, Diagnóstico de transtorno da personalidade
topic Categorical model, Dimensional model, Personality disorder diagnosis
Modelo categórico, Modelo dimensional, Diagnóstico de transtorno da personalidade
description The alternative model of personality disorders introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders provides a diagnostic system that is expected to correspond to the well-known categorical approach of personality disorder diagnoses. The current study aims to improve knowledge about the relationship between pathological personality traits and their corresponding personality types. A Brazilian sample of 1,162 people took part in this study. The results point to some level of continuity between the two models when the variables were treated as dimensional. Contrariwise, there is a lack of strong scientific evidence to justify the maintenance of the categorical approach. We recommend the exclusion of the categorical approach from personality disorder diagnosis systems.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521
10.1590/0102.3772e36nspe15
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0102.3772e36nspe15
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521/28824
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27521/33788
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. Especial (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 Núm. Especial (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 36 No. Especial (2020)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 36 n. Especial (2020)
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211715800956928

Registros relacionados