Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/40555 |
Resumo: | This article consists of a series of guidelines aimed at rethinking our place of speech as literary critics in order to establish an attractive and effective dialogue with cotidianity. It is structured from an idea of “situated” literary criticism thought more than as a discipline, as a practice that allows activating sensitivities about what is established by creating other ways of imagining it. The main hypothesis states that professionals of literature must be thinked from four identities: that of writers, that of archivists, that of ethnographers and that of diffusers. From there, the productions of Josefina Ludmer, Regina Dalcastagnè, Sylvia Molloy and Víctor Vich are analyzed, paying attention to their operations around the hegemonic canon and their specific work methodologies. |
id |
UNB-5_be16a21d6fccbcf259a8cd9a1499aef3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40555 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-5 |
network_name_str |
Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianityCrítica situada: cuatro postulados sobre el trabajo de la crítica literaria en la cotidianeidad Crítica situada: quatro postulados sobre o trabalho da crítica literária na cotidianidadeCrítica literárialugar de falaliteratura contemporâneaCrítica literarialugar de hablaliteratura contemporáneaLiterary criticismplace of speechcontemporary literatureThis article consists of a series of guidelines aimed at rethinking our place of speech as literary critics in order to establish an attractive and effective dialogue with cotidianity. It is structured from an idea of “situated” literary criticism thought more than as a discipline, as a practice that allows activating sensitivities about what is established by creating other ways of imagining it. The main hypothesis states that professionals of literature must be thinked from four identities: that of writers, that of archivists, that of ethnographers and that of diffusers. From there, the productions of Josefina Ludmer, Regina Dalcastagnè, Sylvia Molloy and Víctor Vich are analyzed, paying attention to their operations around the hegemonic canon and their specific work methodologies.Este artículo consiste en una serie de lineamientos dirigidos a repensar nuestro lugar de habla en tanto críticos literarios en función de establecer un diálogo atractivo y efectivo con la cotidianeidad. Se parte de una idea de crítica literaria “situada” pensada más que como una disciplina, como una práctica que permite activar sensibilidades sobre lo establecido, por lo que crea otras formas de imaginarlo. La hipótesis principal afirma que los estudiosos de la literatura deben pensarse a partir de cuatro identidades: la de escritores, la de archivistas, la de etnógrafos y la de difusores. A partir de ahí, se analizan las producciones de Josefina Ludmer, Regina Dalcastagnè, Sylvia Molloy y Víctor Vich prestando atención a sus operaciones alrededor del canon hegemónico y sus metodologías específicas de trabajo.Este artigo consiste em uma série de alinhamentos que visam repensar nosso lugar de fala como críticos literários, a fim de estabelecer um diálogo atraente e efetivo com a cotidianidade. Parte-se de uma ideia de crítica literária “situada” pensada mais do que como disciplina, como prática que permite ativar sensibilidades sobre o estabelecido, criando outras formas de imaginá-lo. A hipótese principal afirma que os estudiosos de literatura devem ser pensados a partir de quatro identidades: a dos escritores, a dos arquivistas, a dos etnógrafos e a dos difusores. A partir daí, são analisadas as produções de Josefina Ludmer, Regina Dalcastagnè, Sylvia Molloy e Víctor Vich, prestando atenção nas suas operações em torno do cânone hegemônico e suas metodologias de trabalho específicas.Grupo de Estudos em Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea, da Pós-Graduação em Literatura da Universidade de Brasília2021-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedEvaluado por los paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/4055510.1590/2316-4018641Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea; No. 64 (2021): Directions of contemporary Brazilian literatureEstudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea; n. 64 (2021): Rumos da literatura brasileira contemporânea2316-40181518-0158reponame:Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporâneainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/40555/31516Copyright (c) 2021 Lucía Tenninahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTennina, Lucía 2021-11-07T21:03:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40555Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudosPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistaestudos@gmail.com2316-40181518-0158opendoar:2021-11-07T21:03:54Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity Crítica situada: cuatro postulados sobre el trabajo de la crítica literaria en la cotidianeidad Crítica situada: quatro postulados sobre o trabalho da crítica literária na cotidianidade |
title |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
spellingShingle |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity Tennina, Lucía Crítica literária lugar de fala literatura contemporânea Crítica literaria lugar de habla literatura contemporánea Literary criticism place of speech contemporary literature |
title_short |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
title_full |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
title_fullStr |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
title_sort |
Situated criticism: four postulates on the work of literary criticism on cotidianity |
author |
Tennina, Lucía |
author_facet |
Tennina, Lucía |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tennina, Lucía |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crítica literária lugar de fala literatura contemporânea Crítica literaria lugar de habla literatura contemporánea Literary criticism place of speech contemporary literature |
topic |
Crítica literária lugar de fala literatura contemporânea Crítica literaria lugar de habla literatura contemporánea Literary criticism place of speech contemporary literature |
description |
This article consists of a series of guidelines aimed at rethinking our place of speech as literary critics in order to establish an attractive and effective dialogue with cotidianity. It is structured from an idea of “situated” literary criticism thought more than as a discipline, as a practice that allows activating sensitivities about what is established by creating other ways of imagining it. The main hypothesis states that professionals of literature must be thinked from four identities: that of writers, that of archivists, that of ethnographers and that of diffusers. From there, the productions of Josefina Ludmer, Regina Dalcastagnè, Sylvia Molloy and Víctor Vich are analyzed, paying attention to their operations around the hegemonic canon and their specific work methodologies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Evaluado por los pares Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/40555 10.1590/2316-4018641 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/40555 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/2316-4018641 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/estudos/article/view/40555/31516 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Lucía Tennina http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Lucía Tennina http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Estudos em Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea, da Pós-Graduação em Literatura da Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Estudos em Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea, da Pós-Graduação em Literatura da Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea; No. 64 (2021): Directions of contemporary Brazilian literature Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea; n. 64 (2021): Rumos da literatura brasileira contemporânea 2316-4018 1518-0158 reponame:Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea |
collection |
Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistaestudos@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800211022067269632 |