The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gondim, Linda M.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade e Estado
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734
Resumo: This paper analyses the boundaries and concrete possibilities related withalternative practices generally adopted by organizations which appearinside the social movements themselves.First of all, the author discusses theoretically the problems caused byorganizing bureaucracies in the social urban movements. Afterwards, shestates the characteristics of an alternative model of democratic-coletiveorganization, which is based on informality, agreement and division of workin ad hoc and minima conditions.The difficulties in both kind of organizations have been considered startingfrom experiences occurred in the suburbs of Fortaleza.This analysis shows the dilemma raised on the one hand in the demand forless formalization and centralism, and on the other hand, for the necessity ofexplicit procedures to clear up conflicts and to evaluate the legitimaty andthe representativity of rival groups, which seek to control the association orto lead the movement.Finally the author proposes a model "organization versus directparticipation". This model, founded in the utopic ideas of Habermas andLechner, praises the search for a consensus, in which all participantsrecognize themselves as subjects of collective life outside any possiblemanipulation and authoritarianism.
id UNB-9_1ac55ca8445d97704409e47b05a2d57b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43734
network_acronym_str UNB-9
network_name_str Sociedade e Estado
repository_id_str
spelling The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal DemocracyLes Mouvements Sociaux Urbains: la Question de I ’Organisation et la Démocratie InterneOS MOVIMENTOS SOCIAIS URBANOS: ORGANIZAÇÃO E DEMOCRACIA INTERNA.This paper analyses the boundaries and concrete possibilities related withalternative practices generally adopted by organizations which appearinside the social movements themselves.First of all, the author discusses theoretically the problems caused byorganizing bureaucracies in the social urban movements. Afterwards, shestates the characteristics of an alternative model of democratic-coletiveorganization, which is based on informality, agreement and division of workin ad hoc and minima conditions.The difficulties in both kind of organizations have been considered startingfrom experiences occurred in the suburbs of Fortaleza.This analysis shows the dilemma raised on the one hand in the demand forless formalization and centralism, and on the other hand, for the necessity ofexplicit procedures to clear up conflicts and to evaluate the legitimaty andthe representativity of rival groups, which seek to control the association orto lead the movement.Finally the author proposes a model "organization versus directparticipation". This model, founded in the utopic ideas of Habermas andLechner, praises the search for a consensus, in which all participantsrecognize themselves as subjects of collective life outside any possiblemanipulation and authoritarianism.Ce travail analyse les limites et les possibilltés concrètes des pratiquesalternatives genéralement adoptées par les organisations qui surgissent desmouvements sociaux. Premièrement, sur le plan théorique, sont analysés lesproblèmes que lapropre formation d'associations organisées sur un modebureaucratique peut entrainer. Dans un deuxième temps, sont présentées lescaracteristiques du modele alternatif d'organisation"démocratico-collectiviste" base sur I 'informalité, sur le consensus et surune division du travail ad hoc et minimale.Les difficultées liées à ces deux types d 'organisation sont envisagées à partirdes expériences intervenues dans le cadre des mouvements de quartier deFortaleza. Cette analyse met en evidence les dilemmes provoqués, d’unepart, par la demande d’une moindre formalisation etd’un moindrecentralisme, d'autre part par la nécessité d’etablir des procédures explicitesafin de diminuer les conflits et d 'évaluer la légitimé et la représentativité desgroupes qui rentrent en compétition pour controlerune association ou un mouvement.Enfim, I 'auteur présente um modèle qui peut être I'unique solution effectivepour résoudre le dilemne "organisation versus participation directe", Cemodèle, qui s 'inspire des idées utopiques de Habermas et de Lechner,préconise la recherche d’un consensus établi à partir d'un processus oil lesintervenants se reconnaissent mutuellement en tant que sujet de la viecollective, et oil iln’y a pas de possibilité de manipulation et d’autoritarisme.Este trabalho analisa os limites e possibilidades concretas relacionados compráticas alternativas geralmente adotadas pelas organizações que emergemno bojo de movimentos sociais. Primeiramente, discute-se, no plano teórico,problemas que a própria formação de associações burocraticamenteorganizadas pode acarretar para os KíSUs. A seguir, apresenta-se ascaracterísticas do modelo alternativo de organização"democrático-coletivista", baseada na informalidade, no consenso e em umadivisão de trabalhos ad hoc e minima.As dificuldades associadas a ambos os tipos de organização sãoconsideradas a partir de experiências ocorridas no movimento de bairros deFortaleza. Esta análise evidencia os dilemas suscitados, de um lado, pelademanda por menor formalização e centralismo e, de outro, pelanecessidade de procedimentos explícitos para dirimir conflitos e avaliar alegitimidade e representatividade de grupos que competem pelo controle deuma associação ou movimento.Finalmente, apresenta-se um modelo que pode ser a única salda efetiva parao dilema "organização versus participação direta". Esse modelo,fundamentado nas idéias utópicas de Habermas e Lechner, preconiza abusca por um consenso baseado em um processo onde todos os participantesse reconheçam mutuamente como sujeitos da vida coletiva, não havendolugar para a manipulação e o autoritarismo.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2022-08-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 6 No. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-150Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 6 Núm. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-150Sociedade e Estado; v. 6 n. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-1501980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734/33438Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estadohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGondim, Linda M. 2022-08-12T17:35:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43734Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2022-08-12T17:35:52Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
Les Mouvements Sociaux Urbains: la Question de I ’Organisation et la Démocratie Interne
OS MOVIMENTOS SOCIAIS URBANOS: ORGANIZAÇÃO E DEMOCRACIA INTERNA
title The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
spellingShingle The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
Gondim, Linda M.
.
title_short The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
title_full The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
title_fullStr The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
title_full_unstemmed The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
title_sort The Urban Social Movements: Problems of Organization and Internal Democracy
author Gondim, Linda M.
author_facet Gondim, Linda M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gondim, Linda M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv .
topic .
description This paper analyses the boundaries and concrete possibilities related withalternative practices generally adopted by organizations which appearinside the social movements themselves.First of all, the author discusses theoretically the problems caused byorganizing bureaucracies in the social urban movements. Afterwards, shestates the characteristics of an alternative model of democratic-coletiveorganization, which is based on informality, agreement and division of workin ad hoc and minima conditions.The difficulties in both kind of organizations have been considered startingfrom experiences occurred in the suburbs of Fortaleza.This analysis shows the dilemma raised on the one hand in the demand forless formalization and centralism, and on the other hand, for the necessity ofexplicit procedures to clear up conflicts and to evaluate the legitimaty andthe representativity of rival groups, which seek to control the association orto lead the movement.Finally the author proposes a model "organization versus directparticipation". This model, founded in the utopic ideas of Habermas andLechner, praises the search for a consensus, in which all participantsrecognize themselves as subjects of collective life outside any possiblemanipulation and authoritarianism.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43734/33438
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 6 No. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-150
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 6 Núm. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-150
Sociedade e Estado; v. 6 n. 02 (1991): O Estado em Questão: Teoria e Prática; 129-150
1980-5462
0102-6992
reponame:Sociedade e Estado
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Sociedade e Estado
collection Sociedade e Estado
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br
_version_ 1800211066438811648