Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade e Estado |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/19928 |
Resumo: | Editora Vozes has published a Portuguese translation of the new second edition of Studies in ethnomethodology. To celebrate that achievement I will talk about the importance of that book and of Garfinkel’s work more generally; in theoretical, methodological and political terms. I will argue that Garfinkel took up Durkheim’s project to make Sociology uniquely suited to the study of modernity and that this explains much of the misunderstanding of his work. I also want to announce the existence of Garfinkel’s Archive of which I am the Director and Intellectual Executor. There are materials in the Archive that should become the focus of important graduate theses and books. Work on the archive is being supported by the German government through a center at Siegen University in Germany called Media of Cooperation. Garfinkel’s argument - like Durkheim’s - changes the epistemological terrain of social science, and hence the theoretical terrain of social argumentation. It shifts the domain of objects from natural to social objects - and the relevant social practices from norms, traditional rules and consensus - to constitutive practices. Because of the enormity of this shift, Ethnomethodology can only be understood by those with a theoretical grasp of what is involved. Otherwise, contradictions follow: as they have. The consequence of Garfinkel’s argument for understanding modern democratic politics is that any inequalities or exclusions that prevent people from being able to fulfill reciprocity conditions in interaction (his famous “Trust Conditions”) are a threat to coherence, meaning, and identity in modern democratic public life. |
id |
UNB-9_3beac4d40a7b0dc415e5b5269075e2e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19928 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-9 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public lifeOs Estudos de etnometodologia de Garfinkel:: uma investigação sobre os alicerces morais da vida pública modernaTeoria sociológica contemporâneaEstudos de etnometodologiaGarfinkelFatos sociais constitutivosJustiça social como questão sociológicaContemporary sociological theoryStudies of etnomethodologyGarfinkelConstitutive social factsSocial justice as a sociological questionEditora Vozes has published a Portuguese translation of the new second edition of Studies in ethnomethodology. To celebrate that achievement I will talk about the importance of that book and of Garfinkel’s work more generally; in theoretical, methodological and political terms. I will argue that Garfinkel took up Durkheim’s project to make Sociology uniquely suited to the study of modernity and that this explains much of the misunderstanding of his work. I also want to announce the existence of Garfinkel’s Archive of which I am the Director and Intellectual Executor. There are materials in the Archive that should become the focus of important graduate theses and books. Work on the archive is being supported by the German government through a center at Siegen University in Germany called Media of Cooperation. Garfinkel’s argument - like Durkheim’s - changes the epistemological terrain of social science, and hence the theoretical terrain of social argumentation. It shifts the domain of objects from natural to social objects - and the relevant social practices from norms, traditional rules and consensus - to constitutive practices. Because of the enormity of this shift, Ethnomethodology can only be understood by those with a theoretical grasp of what is involved. Otherwise, contradictions follow: as they have. The consequence of Garfinkel’s argument for understanding modern democratic politics is that any inequalities or exclusions that prevent people from being able to fulfill reciprocity conditions in interaction (his famous “Trust Conditions”) are a threat to coherence, meaning, and identity in modern democratic public life.A Editora Vozes publicou uma tradução em português da nova segunda edição de Estudos de etnometodologia. Para comemorar essa realização, falarei hoje a respeito da importância desse livro, da obra de Garfinkel em geral, em termos teóricos, metodológicos e políticos. Argumentarei que Garfinkel se dedicou ao projeto durkheimiano de fazer com que a sociologia se tornasse singularmente adequada para o estudo da modernidade, e que isso explica muitas das incompreensões sofridas por esta obra. Quero também anunciar as atividades do Arquivo Garfinkel (Garfinkel Archive), do qual sou hoje diretora e executora intelectual. Há materiais no arquivo que deverão se tornar o foco de importantes teses de pós-graduação e livros. O trabalho com esses arquivos vem sendo apoiado pelo governo alemão por meio de um centro na Universidade de Siegen, na Alemanha, denominado Mídia da Cooperação. O argumento de Garfinkel, assim como o de Durkheim, modifica o território epistemológico da ciência social e, com ele, o território teórico da argumentação social. Ele reorienta o domínio dos objetos, fazendo com que eles deixem de ser objetos naturais para se tornarem objetos sociais; vem como o domínio das práticas sociais relevantes, que deixam de ser normas, regras tradicionais e consensos, para se tornarem práticas constitutivas. Em razão da magnitude dessa reorientação, a etnometodologia só pode ser entendida por pessoas que já tenham uma compreensão teórica do que ela envolve. De outra forma, surgiriam contradições, o que de fato já aconteceu. A consequência do argumento de Garfinkel para entender a política democrática moderna é que quaisquer desigualdades ou exclusões que impeçam as pessoas de estar em condições de cumprir as condições de reciprocidade de uma interação (suas famosas “condições de confiabilidade”) são uma ameaça à coerência, ao significado e à identidade da vida pública democrática moderna. Tradução: Dermeval de Sena Aires JúniorDepartamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2018-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/1992810.1590/s0102-699220183302008Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 No. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-464Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 Núm. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-464Sociedade e Estado; v. 33 n. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-4641980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/19928/18366Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRawls, Anne Warfield2022-04-26T21:19:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19928Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2022-04-26T21:19:47Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life Os Estudos de etnometodologia de Garfinkel:: uma investigação sobre os alicerces morais da vida pública moderna |
title |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
spellingShingle |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life Rawls, Anne Warfield Teoria sociológica contemporânea Estudos de etnometodologia Garfinkel Fatos sociais constitutivos Justiça social como questão sociológica Contemporary sociological theory Studies of etnomethodology Garfinkel Constitutive social facts Social justice as a sociological question |
title_short |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
title_full |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
title_fullStr |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
title_full_unstemmed |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
title_sort |
Garfinkel’s studies in ethnomethodology:: exploring the moral foundations of modern public life |
author |
Rawls, Anne Warfield |
author_facet |
Rawls, Anne Warfield |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rawls, Anne Warfield |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teoria sociológica contemporânea Estudos de etnometodologia Garfinkel Fatos sociais constitutivos Justiça social como questão sociológica Contemporary sociological theory Studies of etnomethodology Garfinkel Constitutive social facts Social justice as a sociological question |
topic |
Teoria sociológica contemporânea Estudos de etnometodologia Garfinkel Fatos sociais constitutivos Justiça social como questão sociológica Contemporary sociological theory Studies of etnomethodology Garfinkel Constitutive social facts Social justice as a sociological question |
description |
Editora Vozes has published a Portuguese translation of the new second edition of Studies in ethnomethodology. To celebrate that achievement I will talk about the importance of that book and of Garfinkel’s work more generally; in theoretical, methodological and political terms. I will argue that Garfinkel took up Durkheim’s project to make Sociology uniquely suited to the study of modernity and that this explains much of the misunderstanding of his work. I also want to announce the existence of Garfinkel’s Archive of which I am the Director and Intellectual Executor. There are materials in the Archive that should become the focus of important graduate theses and books. Work on the archive is being supported by the German government through a center at Siegen University in Germany called Media of Cooperation. Garfinkel’s argument - like Durkheim’s - changes the epistemological terrain of social science, and hence the theoretical terrain of social argumentation. It shifts the domain of objects from natural to social objects - and the relevant social practices from norms, traditional rules and consensus - to constitutive practices. Because of the enormity of this shift, Ethnomethodology can only be understood by those with a theoretical grasp of what is involved. Otherwise, contradictions follow: as they have. The consequence of Garfinkel’s argument for understanding modern democratic politics is that any inequalities or exclusions that prevent people from being able to fulfill reciprocity conditions in interaction (his famous “Trust Conditions”) are a threat to coherence, meaning, and identity in modern democratic public life. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/19928 10.1590/s0102-699220183302008 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/19928 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-699220183302008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/19928/18366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 No. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-464 Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 Núm. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-464 Sociedade e Estado; v. 33 n. 02 (2018): Dossiê: Que sociologias fazemos?; 443-464 1980-5462 0102-6992 reponame:Sociedade e Estado instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
collection |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br |
_version_ |
1800211064631066624 |