Exportação concluída — 

Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chaves
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: de Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade e Estado
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357
Resumo: The present article proposes the analysis of the strengthening of university extension in the scientific field. In order to do so, it departs from the main national extension notice: ProExt - University Extension Program - a partnership between the Ministry of Education (MEC), the Ministry of Culture (MinC) and the Pro-Rectors Forum Extension of the Brazilian Public Universities (Forproex). More specifically, the results of the mentioned notice between 2009 and 2016 (with the exception of 2012). The text begins with a brief contextualization of university extension in the country, from its appearance in the 1930s to the year 2016. Besides, it focuses on the distribution of resources between research lines, regions of the country and types of institutions, the growth and decline of the amount destined to the notice, among other topics obtained through the ProExt / MEC results. Finally, the article discusses the collected data using theories of authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Renato Dagnino and Luciana Maria Cerqueira Castro, who draw relevant and necessary reflections to understand the effective meanings of the 376% growth in investment in projects of extension since the year 2008 in Brazil.
id UNB-9_cb6513de92f9d613e4fdd10c96efd273
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18357
network_acronym_str UNB-9
network_name_str Sociedade e Estado
repository_id_str
spelling Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC noticesO fortalecimento da extensão no campo científico:: uma análise dos editais ProExt/MECextensão universitáriacampo científicoProExt/MECsalvacionismoUniversity extensionscience fieldProExt/MECsalvationThe present article proposes the analysis of the strengthening of university extension in the scientific field. In order to do so, it departs from the main national extension notice: ProExt - University Extension Program - a partnership between the Ministry of Education (MEC), the Ministry of Culture (MinC) and the Pro-Rectors Forum Extension of the Brazilian Public Universities (Forproex). More specifically, the results of the mentioned notice between 2009 and 2016 (with the exception of 2012). The text begins with a brief contextualization of university extension in the country, from its appearance in the 1930s to the year 2016. Besides, it focuses on the distribution of resources between research lines, regions of the country and types of institutions, the growth and decline of the amount destined to the notice, among other topics obtained through the ProExt / MEC results. Finally, the article discusses the collected data using theories of authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Renato Dagnino and Luciana Maria Cerqueira Castro, who draw relevant and necessary reflections to understand the effective meanings of the 376% growth in investment in projects of extension since the year 2008 in Brazil.O presente artigo traz como proposta a análise do fortalecimento da extensão universitária no campo científico. Para tanto, parte-se do principal edital de fomento à extensão em âmbito nacional: o Programa de Extensão Universitária (ProExt) - parceria entre o Ministério da Educação (MEC), o Ministério da Cultura (MinC) e o Fórum de Pró-Reitores de Extensão das Universidades Públicas Brasileiras (Forproex); mais especificamente, os resultados do referido edital entre os anos de 2009 e 2016 (a exceção de 2012). O texto tem início com breve contextualização acerca dos percursos da extensão universitária no país, desde seu surgimento na década de 1930 até o ano de 2016. Posteriormente, são observados pontos como a distribuição dos recursos entre as linhas de pesquisa, as regiões do país e os tipos de instituições, o crescimento e declínio do montante destinado ao edital, entre outros tópicos obtidos por meio dos resultados dos editais ProExt/MEC. Por fim, a busca foi pela análise das informações apreendidas tomando por subsídio a teoria de autores como Pierre Bourdieu, Renato Dagnino e Luciana Maria Cerqueira Castro, que traçam reflexões pertinentes e necessárias à compreensão dos efetivos significados do crescimento de 376% no investimento em projetos de extensão, desde o ano de 2008 no Brasil.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2018-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 No. 01 (2018); 189-214Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 Núm. 01 (2018); 189-214Sociedade e Estado; v. 33 n. 01 (2018); 189-2141980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357/16948Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chavesde Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-04T19:05:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18357Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2018-12-04T19:05:57Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
O fortalecimento da extensão no campo científico:: uma análise dos editais ProExt/MEC
title Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
spellingShingle Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chaves
extensão universitária
campo científico
ProExt/MEC
salvacionismo
University extension
science field
ProExt/MEC
salvation
title_short Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
title_full Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
title_fullStr Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
title_sort Strengthening extension in the science field:: an analysis of ProExt/MEC notices
author Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chaves
author_facet Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chaves
de Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes
author_role author
author2 de Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Incrocci, Lígia Maria de Mendonça Chaves
de Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv extensão universitária
campo científico
ProExt/MEC
salvacionismo
University extension
science field
ProExt/MEC
salvation
topic extensão universitária
campo científico
ProExt/MEC
salvacionismo
University extension
science field
ProExt/MEC
salvation
description The present article proposes the analysis of the strengthening of university extension in the scientific field. In order to do so, it departs from the main national extension notice: ProExt - University Extension Program - a partnership between the Ministry of Education (MEC), the Ministry of Culture (MinC) and the Pro-Rectors Forum Extension of the Brazilian Public Universities (Forproex). More specifically, the results of the mentioned notice between 2009 and 2016 (with the exception of 2012). The text begins with a brief contextualization of university extension in the country, from its appearance in the 1930s to the year 2016. Besides, it focuses on the distribution of resources between research lines, regions of the country and types of institutions, the growth and decline of the amount destined to the notice, among other topics obtained through the ProExt / MEC results. Finally, the article discusses the collected data using theories of authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Renato Dagnino and Luciana Maria Cerqueira Castro, who draw relevant and necessary reflections to understand the effective meanings of the 376% growth in investment in projects of extension since the year 2008 in Brazil.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/18357/16948
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 No. 01 (2018); 189-214
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 33 Núm. 01 (2018); 189-214
Sociedade e Estado; v. 33 n. 01 (2018); 189-214
1980-5462
0102-6992
reponame:Sociedade e Estado
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Sociedade e Estado
collection Sociedade e Estado
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br
_version_ 1800211064595415040

Registros relacionados