The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade e Estado |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638 |
Resumo: | The general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Marinho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market. |
id |
UNB-9_f051dfd3dc14c53f17027474f3c4c60c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43638 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-9 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategyO projeto de capitalização da Previdência Social no governo Bolsonaro: o mercado como estratégia de aposentadoriareforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro.Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administrationThe general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Marinho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market.The article seeks to contribute to the literature on social security reform by identifying the main justifications behind the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The general goal is to identify what kind of solidarity is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by three important state agents involved in the theme (Paulo Guedes, Jair Bolsonaro, and Rogério Marinho). It is inspired by insights from economic sociology and Pierre Bourdieu's sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a pay-as-you-go based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model.O objetivo geral do artigo é contribuir para o debate sobre reforma da Previdência Social, identificando as principais justificativas que embasaram o projeto da reforma apresentada pelo governo de Jair Bolsonaro, em 2019. O objetivo específico é identificar se existe solidariedade na proposta oferecida pelo governo. Nossa metodologia foi baseada na coleta e análise de discursos proferidos pelo principal agente do processo, Paulo Guedes, além de dados complementares junto a Jair Bolsonaro e Rogério Marinho. Tem como inspiração teórica a sociologia de Pierre Bourdieu e insights da sociologia econômica. Os resultados apontam que todas as justificativas acionadas pelo principal agente envolvido na reforma da previdência de 2019 tiveram como objetivo aprovar a transição de um modelo de previdência baseado na repartição, para um modelo de capitalização e que a capitalização da Previdência Social não foi apresentada como complementar, tal qual nos governos anteriores, mas como modelo obrigatório. Se aprovada, a previdência do Brasil passaria a existir em um modelo paralelo, a saber, a manutenção do modelo de repartição para servidores públicos e trabalhadores do setor privado já integrados ao sistema e ao modelo de capitalização para os jovens ingressantes no mercado de trabalho.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2023-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/4363810.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 No. 01 (2023); 63-93Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 Núm. 01 (2023); 63-93Sociedade e Estado; v. 38 n. 01 (2023); 63-931980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638/37304Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estadohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves Jardim, MariaMoura, Paulo Carvalho2023-06-21T14:24:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43638Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2023-06-21T14:24:23Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy O projeto de capitalização da Previdência Social no governo Bolsonaro: o mercado como estratégia de aposentadoria |
title |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
spellingShingle |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy Chaves Jardim, Maria reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro. Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration |
title_short |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
title_full |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
title_fullStr |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
title_sort |
The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy |
author |
Chaves Jardim, Maria |
author_facet |
Chaves Jardim, Maria Moura, Paulo Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moura, Paulo Carvalho |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chaves Jardim, Maria Moura, Paulo Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro. Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration |
topic |
reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro. Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration |
description |
The general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Marinho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638 10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638/37304 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 No. 01 (2023); 63-93 Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 Núm. 01 (2023); 63-93 Sociedade e Estado; v. 38 n. 01 (2023); 63-93 1980-5462 0102-6992 reponame:Sociedade e Estado instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
collection |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br |
_version_ |
1800211066148356097 |