The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chaves Jardim, Maria
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Moura, Paulo Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade e Estado
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638
Resumo: The general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Mari­nho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market.
id UNB-9_f051dfd3dc14c53f17027474f3c4c60c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43638
network_acronym_str UNB-9
network_name_str Sociedade e Estado
repository_id_str
spelling The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategyO projeto de capitalização da Previdência Social no governo Bolsonaro: o mercado como estratégia de aposentadoriareforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro.Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administrationThe general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Mari­nho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market.The article seeks to contribute to the literature on social security reform by identifying the main justifications behind the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The general goal is to identify what kind of solidarity is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by three important state agents involved in the theme (Paulo Guedes, Jair Bolsonaro, and Rogério Marinho). It is inspired by insights from economic sociology and Pierre Bourdieu's sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a pay-as-you-go based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model.O objetivo geral do artigo é contribuir para o debate sobre reforma da Previdência Social, identificando as principais justificativas que embasaram o projeto da reforma apresentada pelo governo de Jair Bolsonaro, em 2019. O objetivo específico é identificar se existe solidariedade na proposta oferecida pelo governo. Nossa metodologia foi baseada na coleta e análise de discursos proferidos pelo principal agente do processo, Paulo Guedes, além de dados complementares junto a Jair Bolsonaro e Rogério Marinho. Tem como inspiração teórica a sociologia de Pierre Bourdieu e insights da sociologia econômica. Os resultados apontam que todas as justificativas acionadas pelo principal agente envolvido na reforma da previdência de 2019 tiveram como objetivo aprovar a transição de um modelo de previdência baseado na repartição, para um modelo de capitalização e que a capitalização da Previdência Social não foi apresentada como complementar, tal qual nos governos anteriores, mas como modelo obrigatório. Se aprovada, a previdência do Brasil passaria a existir em um modelo paralelo, a saber, a manutenção do modelo de repartição para servidores públicos e trabalhadores do setor privado já integrados ao sistema e ao modelo de capitalização para os jovens ingressantes no mercado de trabalho.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2023-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/4363810.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 No. 01 (2023); 63-93Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 Núm. 01 (2023); 63-93Sociedade e Estado; v. 38 n. 01 (2023); 63-931980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638/37304Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estadohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves Jardim, MariaMoura, Paulo Carvalho2023-06-21T14:24:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43638Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2023-06-21T14:24:23Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
O projeto de capitalização da Previdência Social no governo Bolsonaro: o mercado como estratégia de aposentadoria
title The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
spellingShingle The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
Chaves Jardim, Maria
reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro.
Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration
title_short The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
title_full The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
title_fullStr The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
title_full_unstemmed The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
title_sort The social security capitalization project in Bolsonaro’s government: the market as a pension strategy
author Chaves Jardim, Maria
author_facet Chaves Jardim, Maria
Moura, Paulo Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Moura, Paulo Carvalho
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chaves Jardim, Maria
Moura, Paulo Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro.
Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration
topic reforma da previdência social; repartição; capitalização; Governo Bolsonaro.
Social Security reform; Repartition system; Capitalization; Bolsonaro’s administration
description The general objective of the article is to contribute to the debate on Social Security reform, identifying the main justifications that supported the pension reform project presented by the government of Jair Bolsonaro in 2019. The specific objective. The overall objective is to identify whether solidarity exists and, if so, what kind is offered by the government's proposal. Our methodology was based on the collection and analysis of speeches given by the main agent of the process, Paulo Guedes, as well as complementary data with Jair Bolsonaro and Rogério Mari­nho. It has as theoretical inspiration the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and insights from economic sociology. The results point out that all the justifications triggered by the state agents involved in the 2019 pension reform aimed to approve the transition from a repartition-based pension model to a capitalization model and that the capitalization of social security was not presented as complementary, as in previous governments, but as a mandatory model. If approved, Brazil's social security would come to exist in a hybrid model, namely, the maintenance of the pay-as-you-go model for public servants and private sector workers already in the system and the capitalization model for young entrants to the labor market.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638
10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43638/37304
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sociedade e Estado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 No. 01 (2023); 63-93
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 38 Núm. 01 (2023); 63-93
Sociedade e Estado; v. 38 n. 01 (2023); 63-93
1980-5462
0102-6992
reponame:Sociedade e Estado
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Sociedade e Estado
collection Sociedade e Estado
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br
_version_ 1800211066148356097