Factors intervening in the childbirth experience : a mixed-methods study

• Autor(a) principal: Paes, Luciana Braz de Oliveira
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Fabbro, Márcia Regina Cangiani, Toso, Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira, Bussadori, Jamile Claro de Castro, Ruiz, Mariana Torreglosa, Salim, Natália Rejane, Wernet, Monika, Silveira, Aline Oliveira, D Agostini, Flávia Corrêa Porto de Abreu
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UnB
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48790; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06175-3
• topic: Mulheres grávidas; Parto (Obstetrícia); Pós-parto; Experiências vivenciais

Objective To analyze the childbirth experience focusing on the intervening factors and on the delivery method. Method A sequential and explanatory mixed-methods study guided by the World Health Organization document for positive childbirth experiences. The participants were puerperal women in a maternity teaching hospital from inland São Paulo (Brazil). The first quantitative stage involved descriptive analysis with Poisson regression of 265 answers to the “Termômetro da Iniciativa Hospital Amigo da Mulher e da Criança” (“Women- and Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Thermometer”) questionnaire. The second stage, qualitative, thematically analyzed the interviews conducted with 44 puerperal women who took part in the first stage. Data integration was by connection. The results and discussion The analysis by connection showed that among the factors that restricted the positive experience, C-section was predominant (61.9%), understood as an option due to fear of pain, the treatment modality and previous traumas. Restrictions referring to the presence of a companion (99.6%), not having privacy (83%), disrespectful situations (69.5%), too many touches (56.9%) and the absence of skin-to-skin contact (55%), among others, potentiated fear, loneliness, concern, shame, the perception of disrespect and insecurity with the assistance provided. The promoting factors were as follows: choosing the companion (95.4%) for collaborating in the safety perception, not having infections (83.9%), having continuous team monitoring (82.2%) and pain relief methods (78.9%), which were valued by the women. Conclusion The intervening factors that promoted positive experiences were related to clinical and protocol-related issues and to service availability. The restrictive factors were associated with excess interventions, deprivation of rights and of choice, absence of privacy and restriction referring to the presence of a companion. Women with a normal postpartum period felt more insecure and disrespected when compared to those subjected to C-sections, whose choices were considered, although they had lower prevalence of skin-to-skin contact. There is an urgent need to apprehend women's experiences and turn them into actions that guarantee their lives in a safe and respectful way.