Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Gilmar S.
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Huang, Shiou P., Cares, Juvenil E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UnB
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/26004
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582003000300006
Resumo: Temporal (monthly in three fields for 12 months) and spatial (once in 23 fields during March-April) samplings were conducted in the major soybean (Glycine max)-growing region of the Brazilian Federal District. Fifty-three nematode genera were found in both samplings, but 13 were detected only by the temporal sampling, and one only by the spatial sampling. Fifty-three percent were plant-parasites, 35% were bacterivores, and about 12% were fungivores, predators and omnivores constituted the community that was dominated by the genera Helicotylenchus (40% of total abundance), Acrobeles (15%), Cephalobus (7.6%), Meloidogyne(5.6%) and Pratylenchus (4.9%). Heterodera glycines was not found in this study. There were no differences in ten ecological measurements [Ds, H', Es, T, FF/BF, (FF+BF)/PP, MI, PPI, mMI, and Dorylaimida (%)] between the two sampling types, but differences in indexes d and J'. Plant parasite populations dropped at the end of the crop cycle, remained at low levels during the dry season and the seedling period, then increased again in the crop-growing season. Fungivores maintained their low populations throughout the year, increasing only in June and July, the post-harvest period, when soil fungi decomposed root tissue. The population of bacterivores slightly declined during the dry season and the initial rainy season, but peaked in the middle of the rainy season, apparently associated with soil humidity. In the five most abundant nematodes, those of Acrobeles and Pratylenchus were more populous in wet soils, Cephalobus and Meloidogyne adapted well in dry soils, but Helicotylenchus survived abundantly in a wide range of soil moisture.
id UNB_c59ca8ca8da8a57b650fbe5783161ea0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/26004
network_acronym_str UNB
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UnB
repository_id_str
spelling Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fieldsComunidade de nematóides, estrutura trófica e flutuação populacional em plantações de sojaGlicina MaxDinâmica populacionalEcologia de nematóidesAmostragens temporais e espaciaisGrupos funcionaisTemporal (monthly in three fields for 12 months) and spatial (once in 23 fields during March-April) samplings were conducted in the major soybean (Glycine max)-growing region of the Brazilian Federal District. Fifty-three nematode genera were found in both samplings, but 13 were detected only by the temporal sampling, and one only by the spatial sampling. Fifty-three percent were plant-parasites, 35% were bacterivores, and about 12% were fungivores, predators and omnivores constituted the community that was dominated by the genera Helicotylenchus (40% of total abundance), Acrobeles (15%), Cephalobus (7.6%), Meloidogyne(5.6%) and Pratylenchus (4.9%). Heterodera glycines was not found in this study. There were no differences in ten ecological measurements [Ds, H', Es, T, FF/BF, (FF+BF)/PP, MI, PPI, mMI, and Dorylaimida (%)] between the two sampling types, but differences in indexes d and J'. Plant parasite populations dropped at the end of the crop cycle, remained at low levels during the dry season and the seedling period, then increased again in the crop-growing season. Fungivores maintained their low populations throughout the year, increasing only in June and July, the post-harvest period, when soil fungi decomposed root tissue. The population of bacterivores slightly declined during the dry season and the initial rainy season, but peaked in the middle of the rainy season, apparently associated with soil humidity. In the five most abundant nematodes, those of Acrobeles and Pratylenchus were more populous in wet soils, Cephalobus and Meloidogyne adapted well in dry soils, but Helicotylenchus survived abundantly in a wide range of soil moisture.Amostragens temporal (mensalmente em três campos por 12 meses) e espacial (uma vez, em 23 campos, de março a abril) foram feitas na principal região sojícola do Distrito Federal. Nos dois tipos de amostragem foram encontrados 53 gêneros de nematóides, sendo 13 deles detectados apenas pela temporal e um somente pela espacial. Do total, 53% foram fitoparasitos, 35% bacteriófagos e cerca de 12% micófagos, predadores e onívoros. Esses constituíram a comunidade de nematóides, dominada por Helicotylenchus (40% da abundância total), Acrobeles (15%), Cephalobus (7,6%), Meloidogyne (5,6%) e Pratylenchus (4,9%). Heterodera glycines não foi encontrado neste estudo. Não houve diferença quanto aos índices Ds, H', Es, T, FF/BF, (FF+BF)/PP, MI, PPI, mMI e Dorylaimida (%) entre as duas amostragens, mas houve diferença quanto aos índices d e J'. Os fitoparasitas tiveram populações reduzidas no final do ciclo da cultura, se mantiveram em nível baixo na estação seca e no período de desenvolvimento inicial das plantas, aumentando durante o crescimento das mesmas. Os micófagos se mantiveram em baixa população durante o ano, mas se elevaram em junho e julho, período de pós-colheita, em que raízes se encontravam em decomposição por fungos do solo. Os bacteriófagos tiveram suas populações ligeiramente reduzidas durante a seca e a fase inicial das chuvas, mas se elevaram no meio da estação chuvosa, estando, aparentemente, associadas à alta umidade do solo. Dentre os cinco gêneros mais abundantes, Acrobeles e Pratylenchus povoaram mais solos úmidos, enquanto Cephalobus e Meloidogyne adaptaram bem em solos secos, mas Helicotylenchus sobreviveu abundantamente numa grande faixa de umidade.Em processamentoSociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia2017-12-07T04:37:41Z2017-12-07T04:37:41Z2003info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfFitopatol. bras.,v.28,n.3,p.258-266,2003http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/26004https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582003000300006Gomes, Gilmar S.Huang, Shiou P.Cares, Juvenil E.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UnBinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNB2024-08-28T19:04:09Zoai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/26004Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.unb.br/oai/requestrepositorio@unb.bropendoar:2024-08-28T19:04:09Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
Comunidade de nematóides, estrutura trófica e flutuação populacional em plantações de soja
title Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
spellingShingle Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
Gomes, Gilmar S.
Glicina Max
Dinâmica populacional
Ecologia de nematóides
Amostragens temporais e espaciais
Grupos funcionais
title_short Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
title_full Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
title_fullStr Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
title_full_unstemmed Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
title_sort Nematode community, trophic structure and population fluctuation in soybean fields
author Gomes, Gilmar S.
author_facet Gomes, Gilmar S.
Huang, Shiou P.
Cares, Juvenil E.
author_role author
author2 Huang, Shiou P.
Cares, Juvenil E.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Gilmar S.
Huang, Shiou P.
Cares, Juvenil E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glicina Max
Dinâmica populacional
Ecologia de nematóides
Amostragens temporais e espaciais
Grupos funcionais
topic Glicina Max
Dinâmica populacional
Ecologia de nematóides
Amostragens temporais e espaciais
Grupos funcionais
description Temporal (monthly in three fields for 12 months) and spatial (once in 23 fields during March-April) samplings were conducted in the major soybean (Glycine max)-growing region of the Brazilian Federal District. Fifty-three nematode genera were found in both samplings, but 13 were detected only by the temporal sampling, and one only by the spatial sampling. Fifty-three percent were plant-parasites, 35% were bacterivores, and about 12% were fungivores, predators and omnivores constituted the community that was dominated by the genera Helicotylenchus (40% of total abundance), Acrobeles (15%), Cephalobus (7.6%), Meloidogyne(5.6%) and Pratylenchus (4.9%). Heterodera glycines was not found in this study. There were no differences in ten ecological measurements [Ds, H', Es, T, FF/BF, (FF+BF)/PP, MI, PPI, mMI, and Dorylaimida (%)] between the two sampling types, but differences in indexes d and J'. Plant parasite populations dropped at the end of the crop cycle, remained at low levels during the dry season and the seedling period, then increased again in the crop-growing season. Fungivores maintained their low populations throughout the year, increasing only in June and July, the post-harvest period, when soil fungi decomposed root tissue. The population of bacterivores slightly declined during the dry season and the initial rainy season, but peaked in the middle of the rainy season, apparently associated with soil humidity. In the five most abundant nematodes, those of Acrobeles and Pratylenchus were more populous in wet soils, Cephalobus and Meloidogyne adapted well in dry soils, but Helicotylenchus survived abundantly in a wide range of soil moisture.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003
2017-12-07T04:37:41Z
2017-12-07T04:37:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Fitopatol. bras.,v.28,n.3,p.258-266,2003
http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/26004
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582003000300006
identifier_str_mv Fitopatol. bras.,v.28,n.3,p.258-266,2003
url http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/26004
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582003000300006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UnB
collection Repositório Institucional da UnB
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unb.br
_version_ 1814508302808121344