Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328 |
Resumo: | Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use. |
id |
UNC-1_6efcb45ae63bd18a2836992a43dbaeae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2328 |
network_acronym_str |
UNC-1 |
network_name_str |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?Uso e registro conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas: (in) conveniências?Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use.Embora as marcas sejam tradicionalmente mais usadas no Brasil, atualmente produtos com indicações geográficas estão pouco a pouco ganhando visibilidade no mercado. O presente trabalho visa apresentar de forma sucinta as principais conveniências e inconveniências do registro e/ou do uso conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas no Brasil sob diferentes aspectos. Com relação à registrabilidade, destacou-se a diferença de tratamento entre os sinais, onde a indicação geográfica registrada impede o registro de marcas para produto/serviço que com ela possua afinidade. No entanto, não há reciprocidade e marca anteriormente registrada não impede o registro de indicação geográfica nas mesmas circunstâncias. Porém não há que se falar em graus de importância, tendo em vista serem sinais com funções e definições jurídicas diferentes. Com relação ao uso dos sinais, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra tiveram algumas de suas particularidades discutidas. Conclui-se que diferentes tipos de uso conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas já estão sendo colocados em prática. A diluição das funções dos sinais com a possível indução de confusão ao consumidor pode ser apontada como a principal inconveniência encontrada. No entanto, as reais consequências do uso conjunto sobre os produtores/prestadores de serviços, sobre os consumidores e o desenvolvimento local, assim como as conveniências e inconveniências que podem estar associadas a esse registro e uso conjunto necessitam de um período maior de tempo dessa prática para serem devidamente analisados. Palavras chave: Marcas. Indicações Geográficas. Uso conjunto.Universidade do Contestado (UNC)2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/232810.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 69-992237-902910.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328/1243Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Patrícia Maria da SilvaCampos, André Tibau2024-03-07T23:52:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2328Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drdONGhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/oaidaniela@unc.br || revistadrd@unc.br || alexandre@unc.br || josiane@unc.br || valdir@unc.br2237-90292237-9029opendoar:2024-03-07T23:52:01DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? Uso e registro conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas: (in) conveniências? |
title |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
spellingShingle |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva |
title_short |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
title_full |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
title_fullStr |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
title_sort |
Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences? |
author |
Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva Campos, André Tibau |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, André Tibau |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva Campos, André Tibau |
description |
Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328/1243 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 69-99 2237-9029 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2 reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC) instacron:UNC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
instacron_str |
UNC |
institution |
UNC |
reponame_str |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
collection |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
daniela@unc.br || revistadrd@unc.br || alexandre@unc.br || josiane@unc.br || valdir@unc.br |
_version_ |
1805918432486490112 |