Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Campos, André Tibau
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328
Resumo: Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use.
id UNC-1_6efcb45ae63bd18a2836992a43dbaeae
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2328
network_acronym_str UNC-1
network_name_str DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
repository_id_str
spelling Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?Uso e registro conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas: (in) conveniências?Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use.Embora as marcas sejam tradicionalmente mais usadas no Brasil, atualmente produtos com indicações geográficas estão pouco a pouco ganhando visibilidade no mercado. O presente trabalho visa apresentar de forma sucinta as principais conveniências e inconveniências do registro e/ou do uso conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas no Brasil sob diferentes aspectos. Com relação à registrabilidade, destacou-se a diferença de tratamento entre os sinais, onde a indicação geográfica registrada impede o registro de marcas para produto/serviço que com ela possua afinidade. No entanto, não há reciprocidade e marca anteriormente registrada não impede o registro de indicação geográfica nas mesmas circunstâncias. Porém não há que se falar em graus de importância, tendo em vista serem sinais com funções e definições jurídicas diferentes. Com relação ao uso dos sinais, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra tiveram algumas de suas particularidades discutidas. Conclui-se que diferentes tipos de uso conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas já estão sendo colocados em prática. A diluição das funções dos sinais com a possível indução de confusão ao consumidor pode ser apontada como a principal inconveniência encontrada. No entanto, as reais consequências do uso conjunto sobre os produtores/prestadores de serviços, sobre os consumidores e o desenvolvimento local, assim como as conveniências e inconveniências que podem estar associadas a esse registro e uso conjunto necessitam de um período maior de tempo dessa prática para serem devidamente analisados. Palavras chave: Marcas. Indicações Geográficas. Uso conjunto.Universidade do Contestado (UNC)2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/232810.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros paí­ses; 69-992237-902910.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328/1243Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Patrícia Maria da SilvaCampos, André Tibau2024-03-07T23:52:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2328Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drdONGhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/oaidaniela@unc.br || revistadrd@unc.br || alexandre@unc.br || josiane@unc.br || valdir@unc.br2237-90292237-9029opendoar:2024-03-07T23:52:01DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
Uso e registro conjunto de marcas e indicações geográficas: (in) conveniências?
title Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
spellingShingle Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva
title_short Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
title_full Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
title_fullStr Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
title_sort Simultaneous use and registration of trademarks and geographical indications: (in)conveniences?
author Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva
author_facet Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva
Campos, André Tibau
author_role author
author2 Campos, André Tibau
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Patrícia Maria da Silva
Campos, André Tibau
description Although trademarks are traditionally more often used in Brazil, products with geographical indications are gradually becoming more important. This paper aims to present the main conveniences and inconveniences of registration and/or simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications in Brazil. With regard to registrability, the difference in treatment between the signs was highlighted, where the registered geographical indication prevents the registration of trademark for a product/service that has an affinity with it. Nevertheless there is no reciprocity for the previously registered trademark in the same situation. However, it is not the case to mention levels of importance as they are signs with different legal functions and definitions. Regarding the use of signs, Litoral Norte Gaúcho, Região de Salinas, Região do Cerrado Mineiro e Canastra had some of their particularities discussed. It is concluded that different types of simultaneous use of trademarks and geographical indications are already being put into practice. The dilution of the signal functions with the possible cause of consumer misleading can be pointed out as the main inconvenience encountered. However, the real consequences of the simultaneous use on producers/providers of services, consumers and local development, as well as the conveniences and inconveniences that may be associated with this registration and simultaneous use require a longer period of time for this practice to be properly analyzed. Keywords: Trademarks. Geographical Indications. Simultaneous Use.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328
url http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328
identifier_str_mv 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2328
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2328/1243
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros paí­ses; 69-99
2237-9029
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2
reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron:UNC
instname_str Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
reponame_str DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
collection DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv daniela@unc.br || revistadrd@unc.br || alexandre@unc.br || josiane@unc.br || valdir@unc.br
_version_ 1805918432486490112