Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Ana Paula Maia dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Diversitas Journal
Texto Completo: https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1704
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to evaluate the rates of fermentative losses and the recovery of dry matter from different silages of total feed mixture. The total feed mixtures consisted of diets based on forage palm, elephant grass, gliricidia and other ingredients such as sugar cane bagasse, corn bran, soybean meal and urea. 25 experimental silos were made, distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of different mixtures of total feed. The diets were balanced to obtain isoproteic diets. The silos remained sealed for 90 days. After opening, the rates of losses by gases and effluents and the rate of recovery of dry matter from silages were evaluated. Analysis of variance was performed with the results obtained. The averages were compared using the Tukey Test, at 5% probability. The total feed silages composed of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse showed significantly higher values (P <0.05). Gas losses in forage palm silages, alone and in conjunction with elephant grass, as well as elephant grass silages, showed values close to 1% of DM losses. Elephant grass silages had lower effluent loss values (1.9803 kg / ton MV) than those found in forage palm silages and forage palm silages with sugarcane bagasse (2.7259 kg / ton MV and 2.4386 kg / ton MV, respectively). The dry matter recovery rates found in this experiment ranged from 87 to 98%. Forage palm silages, forage palm silages with elephant grass and elephant grass silages showed higher dry matter recovery rates (97.49%; 95.03% and 98.19%, respectively). The silage of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse is not indicated, due to the higher rate of losses.
id UNEAL_35b63d67084cf2bd5e7ab88e7c4db152
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.diversitasjournal.com.br:article/1704
network_acronym_str UNEAL
network_name_str Diversitas Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed SilagesAvaliação de perdas fermentativas e recuperação de matéria seca de diferentes silagens de ração totalABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to evaluate the rates of fermentative losses and the recovery of dry matter from different silages of total feed mixture. The total feed mixtures consisted of diets based on forage palm, elephant grass, gliricidia and other ingredients such as sugar cane bagasse, corn bran, soybean meal and urea. 25 experimental silos were made, distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of different mixtures of total feed. The diets were balanced to obtain isoproteic diets. The silos remained sealed for 90 days. After opening, the rates of losses by gases and effluents and the rate of recovery of dry matter from silages were evaluated. Analysis of variance was performed with the results obtained. The averages were compared using the Tukey Test, at 5% probability. The total feed silages composed of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse showed significantly higher values (P <0.05). Gas losses in forage palm silages, alone and in conjunction with elephant grass, as well as elephant grass silages, showed values close to 1% of DM losses. Elephant grass silages had lower effluent loss values (1.9803 kg / ton MV) than those found in forage palm silages and forage palm silages with sugarcane bagasse (2.7259 kg / ton MV and 2.4386 kg / ton MV, respectively). The dry matter recovery rates found in this experiment ranged from 87 to 98%. Forage palm silages, forage palm silages with elephant grass and elephant grass silages showed higher dry matter recovery rates (97.49%; 95.03% and 98.19%, respectively). The silage of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse is not indicated, due to the higher rate of losses.ABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to evaluate the rates of fermentative losses and the recovery of dry matter from different silages of total feed mixture. The total feed mixtures consisted of diets based on forage palm, elephant grass, gliricidia and other ingredients such as sugar cane bagasse, corn bran, soybean meal and urea. 25 experimental silos were made, distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of different mixtures of total feed. The diets were balanced to obtain isoproteic diets. The silos remained sealed for 90 days. After opening, the rates of losses by gases and effluents and the rate of recovery of dry matter from silages were evaluated. Analysis of variance was performed with the results obtained. The averages were compared using the Tukey Test, at 5% probability. The total feed silages composed of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse showed significantly higher values (P <0.05). Gas losses in forage palm silages, alone and in conjunction with elephant grass, as well as elephant grass silages, showed values close to 1% of DM losses. Elephant grass silages had lower effluent loss values (1.9803 kg / ton MV) than those found in forage palm silages and forage palm silages with sugarcane bagasse (2.7259 kg / ton MV and 2.4386 kg / ton MV, respectively). The dry matter recovery rates found in this experiment ranged from 87 to 98%. Forage palm silages, forage palm silages with elephant grass and elephant grass silages showed higher dry matter recovery rates (97.49%; 95.03% and 98.19%, respectively). The silage of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse is not indicated, due to the higher rate of losses. KEYWORDS: gas production, forage palm silage, total diet silage.Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal2021-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/170410.48017/dj.v6i4.1704Diversitas Journal; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021): Education realities in the Sars-Covid19 Pandemic ; 4152-4158Diversitas Journal; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2021): Realidades de la educación en la pandemia Sars-Covid 19; 4152-4158Diversitas Journal; v. 6 n. 4 (2021): Realidades da educação na Pandemia Sars-Covid 19 ; 4152-41582525-521510.48017/dj.v6i4reponame:Diversitas Journalinstname:Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)instacron:UNEALporhttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1704/1534Copyright (c) 2021 Fúlvio Macio Correia de Moraes, Ana Paula Maia Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia deSantos, Ana Paula Maia dos2024-04-19T19:49:50Zoai:ojs.diversitasjournal.com.br:article/1704Revistahttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/indexPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/muralinternacional/oairevistadiversitasjournal@gmail.com2525-52152525-5215opendoar:2024-04-19T19:49:50Diversitas Journal - Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
Avaliação de perdas fermentativas e recuperação de matéria seca de diferentes silagens de ração total
title Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
spellingShingle Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
Moraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia de
title_short Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
title_full Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
title_fullStr Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
title_sort Evaluation of Fermentative Losses and Dry Matter Recovery from Different Total Feed Silages
author Moraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia de
author_facet Moraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia de
Santos, Ana Paula Maia dos
author_role author
author2 Santos, Ana Paula Maia dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Fúlvio Macio Correia de
Santos, Ana Paula Maia dos
description ABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to evaluate the rates of fermentative losses and the recovery of dry matter from different silages of total feed mixture. The total feed mixtures consisted of diets based on forage palm, elephant grass, gliricidia and other ingredients such as sugar cane bagasse, corn bran, soybean meal and urea. 25 experimental silos were made, distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of different mixtures of total feed. The diets were balanced to obtain isoproteic diets. The silos remained sealed for 90 days. After opening, the rates of losses by gases and effluents and the rate of recovery of dry matter from silages were evaluated. Analysis of variance was performed with the results obtained. The averages were compared using the Tukey Test, at 5% probability. The total feed silages composed of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse showed significantly higher values (P <0.05). Gas losses in forage palm silages, alone and in conjunction with elephant grass, as well as elephant grass silages, showed values close to 1% of DM losses. Elephant grass silages had lower effluent loss values (1.9803 kg / ton MV) than those found in forage palm silages and forage palm silages with sugarcane bagasse (2.7259 kg / ton MV and 2.4386 kg / ton MV, respectively). The dry matter recovery rates found in this experiment ranged from 87 to 98%. Forage palm silages, forage palm silages with elephant grass and elephant grass silages showed higher dry matter recovery rates (97.49%; 95.03% and 98.19%, respectively). The silage of forage palm with sugarcane bagasse is not indicated, due to the higher rate of losses.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1704
10.48017/dj.v6i4.1704
url https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1704
identifier_str_mv 10.48017/dj.v6i4.1704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1704/1534
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fúlvio Macio Correia de Moraes, Ana Paula Maia Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fúlvio Macio Correia de Moraes, Ana Paula Maia Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Diversitas Journal; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021): Education realities in the Sars-Covid19 Pandemic ; 4152-4158
Diversitas Journal; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2021): Realidades de la educación en la pandemia Sars-Covid 19; 4152-4158
Diversitas Journal; v. 6 n. 4 (2021): Realidades da educação na Pandemia Sars-Covid 19 ; 4152-4158
2525-5215
10.48017/dj.v6i4
reponame:Diversitas Journal
instname:Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
instacron:UNEAL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
instacron_str UNEAL
institution UNEAL
reponame_str Diversitas Journal
collection Diversitas Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Diversitas Journal - Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadiversitasjournal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051271894532096