Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lins, Carla Lúcia Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Mayara Cristien Soares, Batista, Thayne Pereira, Silva, Douglas Ferreira da, Romão, Dayse Andrade, Nemezio, Mariana Alencar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Diversitas Journal
Texto Completo: https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1660
Resumo: ABSTRACT: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentistry undergraduates regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The research was carried out during 7 months with students from the last year of graduation (5th grade). An initial visit was made at the dental schools of a municipality in Northeastern Brazil and the students answered a questionnaire containing questions related to the choice of restorative materials, their properties and utilities. The inclusion criteria were undergraduates in Dentistry, attending the last year of the said graduation. Students who had perhaps lost some discipline or locked the course were excluded from this study. The collected data were stored in the Microsoft Office Excel 2016 program, being analyzed with the help of the chi-square test. Composite resin (CR) was the material of choice in patients with low risk and low caries activity with the presence of the marginal crest (82.6%) and absence of marginal crest (67.4%). In patients with high laughter and high activity, conventional glass ionomer cement (IVC) was indicated in both situations 65.2% and 84.8% respectively. Regarding the advantages of the most reported materials by the participants in relation to the IVC was fluoride release (100%) whereas for CR was aesthetics (84.1%). On the other hand, the greatest disadvantage of IVC was related to syneresis and imbibition (75%) and CR was the contraction of polymerization (83.7%). It can be concluded that students have knowledge regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. KEYWORDS: Composite resin; Glass Ionomer; Dental materials; Pediatric Dentistry.
id UNEAL_d780d1ac82fd59f9e5395b87ea2d8a55
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1660
network_acronym_str UNEAL
network_name_str Diversitas Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduosABSTRACT: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentistry undergraduates regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The research was carried out during 7 months with students from the last year of graduation (5th grade). An initial visit was made at the dental schools of a municipality in Northeastern Brazil and the students answered a questionnaire containing questions related to the choice of restorative materials, their properties and utilities. The inclusion criteria were undergraduates in Dentistry, attending the last year of the said graduation. Students who had perhaps lost some discipline or locked the course were excluded from this study. The collected data were stored in the Microsoft Office Excel 2016 program, being analyzed with the help of the chi-square test. Composite resin (CR) was the material of choice in patients with low risk and low caries activity with the presence of the marginal crest (82.6%) and absence of marginal crest (67.4%). In patients with high laughter and high activity, conventional glass ionomer cement (IVC) was indicated in both situations 65.2% and 84.8% respectively. Regarding the advantages of the most reported materials by the participants in relation to the IVC was fluoride release (100%) whereas for CR was aesthetics (84.1%). On the other hand, the greatest disadvantage of IVC was related to syneresis and imbibition (75%) and CR was the contraction of polymerization (83.7%). It can be concluded that students have knowledge regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. KEYWORDS: Composite resin; Glass Ionomer; Dental materials; Pediatric Dentistry.RESUMO: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o conhecimento dos graduandos de Odontologia com relação aos materiais utilizados em restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos. A pesquisa foi realizada durante 7 meses com alunos do último ano de graduação (5º ano). Foi realizada uma visita inicial nas faculdades de Odontologia de um município do Nordeste Brasileiro e os alunos responderam um questionário contendo perguntas relacionadas à escolha dos materiais restauradores, suas propriedades e utilidades. Os dados coletados foram armazenados no programa Microsoft Office Excel 2016, sendo analisados com o auxílio do teste do qui-quadrado.  A resina composta (RC) foi material de escolha em paciente com baixo risco e baixa atividade de cárie com a presença da crista marginal (82,6%) e ausência de crista marginal (67,4%). Nos pacientes de alto riso e alta atividade, o cimento de ionômero de vidro convencional (CIV) foi indicado nas duas situações 65,2% e 84,8% respectivamente. Com relação as vantagens dos materiais a mais relatada pelos participantes com relação ao CIV foi liberação de flúor (100%) enquanto que para a RC foi a estética (84,1%). Por outro lado, a maior desvantagem do CIV estava relacionada a sinérese e embebição (75%) e da RC foi a contração de polimerização (83,7%). Pode-se concluir que os alunos têm conhecimento com relação aos materiais utilizados em restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos, assim como suas vantagens e desvantagens. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Resina Composta; Ionômero de Vidro; Materiais Dentários; Odontopediatria.Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/166010.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i2-1660Diversitas Journal; v. 6 n. 2 (2021): Educação para o desenvolvimento socioeconômico ; 2324-23342525-521510.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i2reponame:Diversitas Journalinstname:Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)instacron:UNEALporhttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1660/1391Copyright (c) 2021 Carla Lúcia Santos Lins, Mayara Cristien Soares Teixeira, Thayne Pereira Batista, Douglas Ferreira da Silva, Dayse Andrade Romão, Mariana Alencar Nemeziohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLins, Carla Lúcia SantosTeixeira, Mayara Cristien SoaresBatista, Thayne PereiraSilva, Douglas Ferreira daRomão, Dayse AndradeNemezio, Mariana Alencar2021-08-12T20:37:43Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1660Revistahttps://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/indexPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/muralinternacional/oairevistadiversitasjournal@gmail.com2525-52152525-5215opendoar:2023-01-13T09:47:18.548302Diversitas Journal - Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
title Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
spellingShingle Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
Lins, Carla Lúcia Santos
title_short Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
title_full Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
title_fullStr Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
title_full_unstemmed Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
title_sort Conhecimento dos graduandos de odontologia sobre materiais utilizados para restaurações classe II em dentes decíduos
author Lins, Carla Lúcia Santos
author_facet Lins, Carla Lúcia Santos
Teixeira, Mayara Cristien Soares
Batista, Thayne Pereira
Silva, Douglas Ferreira da
Romão, Dayse Andrade
Nemezio, Mariana Alencar
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Mayara Cristien Soares
Batista, Thayne Pereira
Silva, Douglas Ferreira da
Romão, Dayse Andrade
Nemezio, Mariana Alencar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lins, Carla Lúcia Santos
Teixeira, Mayara Cristien Soares
Batista, Thayne Pereira
Silva, Douglas Ferreira da
Romão, Dayse Andrade
Nemezio, Mariana Alencar
description ABSTRACT: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentistry undergraduates regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The research was carried out during 7 months with students from the last year of graduation (5th grade). An initial visit was made at the dental schools of a municipality in Northeastern Brazil and the students answered a questionnaire containing questions related to the choice of restorative materials, their properties and utilities. The inclusion criteria were undergraduates in Dentistry, attending the last year of the said graduation. Students who had perhaps lost some discipline or locked the course were excluded from this study. The collected data were stored in the Microsoft Office Excel 2016 program, being analyzed with the help of the chi-square test. Composite resin (CR) was the material of choice in patients with low risk and low caries activity with the presence of the marginal crest (82.6%) and absence of marginal crest (67.4%). In patients with high laughter and high activity, conventional glass ionomer cement (IVC) was indicated in both situations 65.2% and 84.8% respectively. Regarding the advantages of the most reported materials by the participants in relation to the IVC was fluoride release (100%) whereas for CR was aesthetics (84.1%). On the other hand, the greatest disadvantage of IVC was related to syneresis and imbibition (75%) and CR was the contraction of polymerization (83.7%). It can be concluded that students have knowledge regarding the materials used in class II restorations in deciduous teeth, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. KEYWORDS: Composite resin; Glass Ionomer; Dental materials; Pediatric Dentistry.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1660
10.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i2-1660
url https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1660
identifier_str_mv 10.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i2-1660
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/1660/1391
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Alagoas - Eduneal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Diversitas Journal; v. 6 n. 2 (2021): Educação para o desenvolvimento socioeconômico ; 2324-2334
2525-5215
10.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i2
reponame:Diversitas Journal
instname:Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
instacron:UNEAL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
instacron_str UNEAL
institution UNEAL
reponame_str Diversitas Journal
collection Diversitas Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Diversitas Journal - Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadiversitasjournal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051278169210880