From archeology to networks: have we never been modern?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370 |
Resumo: | Bruno Latour’s notion of “network” allows us to open a methodological perspective, which can go beyond the limits of Michel Foucault’s archeology. To indicate the conceptual framework in which the notion of archeology is installed, this article develops a discussion of modern science according to Foucault’s archeology and the position of Gérard Lebrun, as opposed to Husserl (Krisis). From the main question that unites them in spite of important differences, namely the diagnosis of the dispersion of the positive sciences in the beginning of modernity - as the beginning of modernity -, it will be possible to suggest the interest of the Latourian notion of network. And this, even showing that his interest implies exactly the reverse of what Latour insists on sustaining, the reverse of the thesis that we have never been modern. |
id |
UNESP-10_04342799f055a9234fa9509ac972aef9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9370 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern?Da arqueologia às redes: jamais fomos modernos?ArqueologiaRedesFoucaultLatourModernoSArcheologyNetworksFoucaultLatourModernBruno Latour’s notion of “network” allows us to open a methodological perspective, which can go beyond the limits of Michel Foucault’s archeology. To indicate the conceptual framework in which the notion of archeology is installed, this article develops a discussion of modern science according to Foucault’s archeology and the position of Gérard Lebrun, as opposed to Husserl (Krisis). From the main question that unites them in spite of important differences, namely the diagnosis of the dispersion of the positive sciences in the beginning of modernity - as the beginning of modernity -, it will be possible to suggest the interest of the Latourian notion of network. And this, even showing that his interest implies exactly the reverse of what Latour insists on sustaining, the reverse of the thesis that we have never been modern.A noção de “rede” de Bruno Latour permite abrir uma perspectiva metodológica capaz de ultrapassar os limites da arqueologia de Michel Foucault. Para indicar o quadro conceitual em que a noção de arqueologia se instala, este artigo desenvolve uma discussão sobre a ciência moderna segundo a arqueologia de Foucault e segundo a posição de Gérard Lebrun, exposta em contraposição a Husserl (Krisis). A partir da questão principal que os une malgrado diferença importantes, a saber, o diagnóstico da dispersão das ciências positivas no início da modernidade – como início da modernidade –, será possível sugerir o interesse da noção latouriana de rede. E isso, mesmo mostrando que seu interesse implica exatamente o avesso do que insiste em sustentar Latour, o avesso da tese de que jamais fomos modernos.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 255-276TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-2761980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/9024https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/9025https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/14249https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/14250Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStival, Monica Loyola2023-05-30T06:14:50Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9370Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-05-30T06:14:50Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? Da arqueologia às redes: jamais fomos modernos? |
title |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
spellingShingle |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? Stival, Monica Loyola Arqueologia Redes Foucault Latour ModernoS Archeology Networks Foucault Latour Modern |
title_short |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
title_full |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
title_fullStr |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
title_full_unstemmed |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
title_sort |
From archeology to networks: have we never been modern? |
author |
Stival, Monica Loyola |
author_facet |
Stival, Monica Loyola |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stival, Monica Loyola |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arqueologia Redes Foucault Latour ModernoS Archeology Networks Foucault Latour Modern |
topic |
Arqueologia Redes Foucault Latour ModernoS Archeology Networks Foucault Latour Modern |
description |
Bruno Latour’s notion of “network” allows us to open a methodological perspective, which can go beyond the limits of Michel Foucault’s archeology. To indicate the conceptual framework in which the notion of archeology is installed, this article develops a discussion of modern science according to Foucault’s archeology and the position of Gérard Lebrun, as opposed to Husserl (Krisis). From the main question that unites them in spite of important differences, namely the diagnosis of the dispersion of the positive sciences in the beginning of modernity - as the beginning of modernity -, it will be possible to suggest the interest of the Latourian notion of network. And this, even showing that his interest implies exactly the reverse of what Latour insists on sustaining, the reverse of the thesis that we have never been modern. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/9024 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/9025 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/14249 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9370/14250 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 255-276 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 255-276 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1794795209917202432 |