Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Roberto Drawin, Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Almeida, Frederico Soares de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032
Resumo: This article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations.
id UNESP-10_313ef47f07c8f8567cfd92091100c803
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/15032
network_acronym_str UNESP-10
network_name_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and RicoeurOntologia e antropologia: possíveis diálogos entre as hermenêuticas de Heidegger e RicoeurOntologyAnthropologyHermeneuticsOntologiaAntropologiaHermenêuticaThis article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations.Este artigo objetiva matizar a taxativa contraposição entre a “via curta” da ontologia heideggeriana e a “via longa” adotada por Ricoeur, como representação das muitas mediações necessárias na constituição de sua antropologia filosófica. Heidegger irrompe no pensamento contemporâneo com a publicação de seu tratado Ser e tempo (1927), como uma espécie de instalação direta no terreno da ontologia. Em contraste, Ricoeur é visto – e ele mesmo se vê – como um pensador das mediações conceituais, em seu longo itinerário, desde a adesão à fenomenologia husserliana e posterior inflexão hermenêutica, passando por confrontações com a psicanálise freudiana, o estruturalismo e a filosofia analítica, até a formação do livro O si-mesmo como outro (1990). Contudo, os dois filósofos construíram suas obras no horizonte comum da hermenêutica; assim, há entre eles possíveis pontos de convergência? E como se poderia interpretar a relevância dessa possível interlocução? Esses questionamentos não podem ser respondidos sem uma minuciosa leitura comparativa. Este texto não pretende respondê-los, mas apenas sugerir elementos para posteriores investigações.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2024-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e024001171980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16164https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16163https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16165https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16166Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesphttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRoberto Drawin, CarlosAlmeida, Frederico Soares de2024-05-11T15:58:04Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/15032Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2024-05-11T15:58:04Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
Ontologia e antropologia: possíveis diálogos entre as hermenêuticas de Heidegger e Ricoeur
title Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
spellingShingle Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
Roberto Drawin, Carlos
Ontology
Anthropology
Hermeneutics
Ontologia
Antropologia
Hermenêutica
title_short Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
title_full Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
title_fullStr Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
title_full_unstemmed Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
title_sort Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
author Roberto Drawin, Carlos
author_facet Roberto Drawin, Carlos
Almeida, Frederico Soares de
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Frederico Soares de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Roberto Drawin, Carlos
Almeida, Frederico Soares de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ontology
Anthropology
Hermeneutics
Ontologia
Antropologia
Hermenêutica
topic Ontology
Anthropology
Hermeneutics
Ontologia
Antropologia
Hermenêutica
description This article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16164
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16163
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16165
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16166
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/x-mobipocket-ebook
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e02400117
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e02400117
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e02400117
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e02400117
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e02400117
1980-539X
0101-3173
reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
collection Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv transformacao@marilia.unesp.br
_version_ 1800214814420631552