Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to counter against the accusation of technophobic, wrongly directed to Hans Jonas, his proposal for an ethical turn of technology, whose bases would be on the ethical capacity to impose restraint on the utopian advance of technical progress, something that leads to the ethics of responsibility to the controversial concept of “heuristic of fear”. To do so, we started from an examination of the Jonasian project of a philosophy of technology, whose third perspective would be valuable, which is the one he developed best. From there, we will analyze what would be the value of technology from the point of view of life (in its four spheres: present and future, human and extra-human) and then strategically analyze the position of Gerard Lebrun for whom Jonas should be placed among technophobic philosophers. Our aim, in this case, is to demonstrate the inconsistency of such an interpretation, precisely because the French thinker with an important presence in Brazil, confuses the proposal of ethical reorientation (in the sense of a power from inside of the technique) with the imposition of an external power, of a paralyzing type. |
id |
UNESP-10_46b063879eebf7c301b792fa44ba1002 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/11953 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobicPara uma ethical turn da tecnologia: por que Hans Jonas não é um tecnofóbicoTecnofobiaHans JonasEthical turnResponsabilidadeHeurística do temorTechnophobiaHans JonasEthical turnResponsibilityHeuristic of fearThe purpose of this article is to counter against the accusation of technophobic, wrongly directed to Hans Jonas, his proposal for an ethical turn of technology, whose bases would be on the ethical capacity to impose restraint on the utopian advance of technical progress, something that leads to the ethics of responsibility to the controversial concept of “heuristic of fear”. To do so, we started from an examination of the Jonasian project of a philosophy of technology, whose third perspective would be valuable, which is the one he developed best. From there, we will analyze what would be the value of technology from the point of view of life (in its four spheres: present and future, human and extra-human) and then strategically analyze the position of Gerard Lebrun for whom Jonas should be placed among technophobic philosophers. Our aim, in this case, is to demonstrate the inconsistency of such an interpretation, precisely because the French thinker with an important presence in Brazil, confuses the proposal of ethical reorientation (in the sense of a power from inside of the technique) with the imposition of an external power, of a paralyzing type.O objetivo do presente artigo é contrapor à acusação de tecnofóbico, erroneamente dirigida a Hans Jonas, a sua proposta de uma ethical turn da tecnologia, cujas bases estariam na capacidade ética de impor contenções ao avanço utópico do progresso técnico, algo que leva a ética da responsabilidade ao polêmico conceito de “heurística do temor”. Para tanto, parte-se de um exame sobre o projeto jonasiano de uma filosofia da tecnologia, cuja terceira perspectiva seria valorativa, sendo esta a que ele melhor desenvolveu. A partir daí, analisa-se qual seria o valor da tecnologia, com base no ponto de vista da vida (nos seus quatro âmbitos: presente e futura, humana e extra-humana) para então se examinar, estrategicamente, a posição de Gerard Lebrun, para quem Jonas estaria entre os filósofos tecnofóbicos. O intuito, nesse caso, é demonstrar a incoerência de tal interpretação, precisamente porque o pensador francês, com grande atuação no Brasil, confunde a proposta da reorientação ética (no sentido de um poder desde dentro da técnica) com a imposição de um poder exterior, de cunho paralisante.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 45 n. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2022): April-June/2022; 191-206TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 45 N. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-2061980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/8834https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/8835https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/11721https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/11722Copyright (c) 2022 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Jelson Roberto de 2023-04-27T18:01:13Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/11953Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-04-27T18:01:13Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic Para uma ethical turn da tecnologia: por que Hans Jonas não é um tecnofóbico |
title |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
spellingShingle |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic Oliveira, Jelson Roberto de Tecnofobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsabilidade Heurística do temor Technophobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsibility Heuristic of fear |
title_short |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
title_full |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
title_fullStr |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
title_sort |
Toward an ethical turn of the technology: why Hans Jonas is not a technophobic |
author |
Oliveira, Jelson Roberto de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Jelson Roberto de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Jelson Roberto de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tecnofobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsabilidade Heurística do temor Technophobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsibility Heuristic of fear |
topic |
Tecnofobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsabilidade Heurística do temor Technophobia Hans Jonas Ethical turn Responsibility Heuristic of fear |
description |
The purpose of this article is to counter against the accusation of technophobic, wrongly directed to Hans Jonas, his proposal for an ethical turn of technology, whose bases would be on the ethical capacity to impose restraint on the utopian advance of technical progress, something that leads to the ethics of responsibility to the controversial concept of “heuristic of fear”. To do so, we started from an examination of the Jonasian project of a philosophy of technology, whose third perspective would be valuable, which is the one he developed best. From there, we will analyze what would be the value of technology from the point of view of life (in its four spheres: present and future, human and extra-human) and then strategically analyze the position of Gerard Lebrun for whom Jonas should be placed among technophobic philosophers. Our aim, in this case, is to demonstrate the inconsistency of such an interpretation, precisely because the French thinker with an important presence in Brazil, confuses the proposal of ethical reorientation (in the sense of a power from inside of the technique) with the imposition of an external power, of a paralyzing type. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/8834 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/8835 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/11721 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/11953/11722 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 45 n. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2022): April-June/2022; 191-206 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 45 N. 2 (2022): Abril-Junho/2022; 191-206 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1794795205359042560 |