Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032 |
Resumo: | This article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations. |
id |
UNESP-10_6872103aa34805b02fd4dc8f9b2e2df5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/15032 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and RicoeurOntologia e antropologia: possíveis diálogos entre as hermenêuticas de Heidegger e RicoeurOntologiaAntropologiaHermenêuticaOntologyAnthropologyHermeneuticsThis article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations.Este artigo objetiva matizar a taxativa contraposição entre a “via curta” da ontologia heideggeriana e a “via longa” adotada por Ricoeur, como representação das muitas mediações necessárias na constituição de sua antropologia filosófica. Heidegger irrompe no pensamento contemporâneo com a publicação de seu tratado Ser e tempo (1927), como uma espécie de instalação direta no terreno da ontologia. Em contraste, Ricoeur é visto – e ele mesmo se vê – como um pensador das mediações conceituais, em seu longo itinerário, desde a adesão à fenomenologia husserliana e posterior inflexão hermenêutica, passando por confrontações com a psicanálise freudiana, o estruturalismo e a filosofia analítica, até a formação do livro O si-mesmo como outro (1990). Contudo, os dois filósofos construíram suas obras no horizonte comum da hermenêutica; assim, há entre eles possíveis pontos de convergência? E como se poderia interpretar a relevância dessa possível interlocução? Esses questionamentos não podem ser respondidos sem uma minuciosa leitura comparativa. Este texto não pretende respondê-los, mas apenas sugerir elementos para posteriores investigações.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2024-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/octet-streamtext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/1503210.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n1.e02400117Trans/Form/Ação; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e02400117TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e02400117Trans/Form/Ação; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e024001171980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16164https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/17238https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16163https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16165https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16166Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesphttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRoberto Drawin, CarlosAlmeida, Frederico Soares de2024-09-19T22:04:22Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/15032Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2024-09-19T22:04:22Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur Ontologia e antropologia: possíveis diálogos entre as hermenêuticas de Heidegger e Ricoeur |
title |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
spellingShingle |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur Roberto Drawin, Carlos Ontologia Antropologia Hermenêutica Ontology Anthropology Hermeneutics |
title_short |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
title_full |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
title_fullStr |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
title_sort |
Ontology and anthropology: possible dialogues between the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Ricoeur |
author |
Roberto Drawin, Carlos |
author_facet |
Roberto Drawin, Carlos Almeida, Frederico Soares de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Frederico Soares de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Roberto Drawin, Carlos Almeida, Frederico Soares de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ontologia Antropologia Hermenêutica Ontology Anthropology Hermeneutics |
topic |
Ontologia Antropologia Hermenêutica Ontology Anthropology Hermeneutics |
description |
This article aims to clarify the sharp contrast between the “short path” of Heideggerian ontology and the “long path” adopted by Ricoeur as a representation of the many necessary mediations in the constitution of his philosophical anthropology. Heidegger breaks into contemporary thought with the publication of his treatise “Being and Time” (1927) as a kind of direct settlement in the field of ontology. In contrast, Ricoeur is seen – and sees himself – as a thinker of conceptual mediations in his long itinerary, since adherence to Husserlian phenomenology and subsequent hermeneutic inflection, passing through confrontations with Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralism and analytical philosophy, to the creation of the book “Oneself as Another” (1990). However, the two philosophers built their works on the common horizon of hermeneutics; therefore, are there possible points of convergence between them? And how could we interpret the relevance of this possible interlocution? These questions cannot be answered without a thorough comparative reading. This text does not intend to answer them, but only to suggest elements for further investigations. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032 10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n1.e02400117 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n1.e02400117 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16164 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/17238 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16163 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16165 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/15032/16166 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/octet-stream text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e02400117 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e02400117 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e02400117 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e02400117 Trans/Form/Ação; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e02400117 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1817972852462190592 |