‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339 |
Resumo: | This article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general. |
id |
UNESP-10_6f683217eec9220c8f15c6e0ca515ece |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13339 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso? El fort/da en 'Ser justo con Freud' y en el debate de Derrida/Foucault‘Quem anuncia o não recurso?’: o fort/da em ‘Fazer justiça a Freud’ e no debate Derrida/FoucaultDerridaFort/dadeconstrucciónpsicoanálisisFreudFoucaultLocuraRazónFort/daLocuraPsicoanálisisDeconstrucciónTransferenciaDerridafort/dadeconstructionPsychoanalysisFreudFoucaultMadnessReasonThis article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general.Este articulo consiste en un comentario del ensayo 'Ser justo con Fred: La historia de la locura en la época del psicoanálisis' de Derrida con el fin de seguir las huellas de lo que no puede ser re-apropiado por las premisas de un debate entre Derrida Y Foucault. Al analizar la pregunta '¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso?´, se defenderá que Derrida escribe compulsivamente los efectos de su propia resistencia al reprimir la sinrazón y reproducir la busqueda Foucaultiana de un ´más alla de la razón.' Esta compulsión de reptición no solo mantiene el debate abierto, sino que gatilla el retorno de la sinrazón como un desarreglo del principio de identidad que desastibiliza toda autoria sobre una historia de la locura en general y de todas sus críticas. Este artículo propone leer los intercambios de Derrida y Foucault deconstruyendo las premisas en las que se sostiene todo debate en general.Este artículo consiste en un comentario del ensayo Ser justo con Freud: La historia de la locura en la era del psicoanálisis de Derrida con el objeto de rastrear lo que no puede ser reapropiado por la presuposición del marco del debate entre Derrida y Foucault. Al analizar la pregunta “¿quién anuncia el no-recurso?”, exploraré la forma en que la escritura de Derrida es afectada por la necesidad e imposibilidad de no reprimir la sinrazón. Argumentaré que Derrida compulsivamente escribe los efectos de dicha resistencia a no reprimir la sinrazón a través de la repetición de la búsqueda Foucaultiana de un más allá de la razón. Esta “compulsión de repetición’ no solamente reabre una y otra vez el debate, sino que desencadena el retorno de la sinrazón en la forma de un desarreglo de los principios de identidad y tiempo lineal, desestabilizando todo forma de autoría sobre la historia de la locura en general y cada una de sus críticas. Este artículo se aproxima a los intercambios entre Derrida y Foucault deconstruyendo la premisa de la posibilidad de un debate sobre la historia de la locura.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2023-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 46 n. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): April-June/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 46 N. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-1921980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11907https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11967https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11968https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11969Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontalva, Joaquín2023-06-12T19:09:59Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13339Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-06-12T19:09:59Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate ¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso? El fort/da en 'Ser justo con Freud' y en el debate de Derrida/Foucault ‘Quem anuncia o não recurso?’: o fort/da em ‘Fazer justiça a Freud’ e no debate Derrida/Foucault |
title |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
spellingShingle |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate Montalva, Joaquín Derrida Fort/da deconstrucción psicoanálisis Freud Foucault Locura Razón Fort/da Locura Psicoanálisis Deconstrucción Transferencia Derrida fort/da deconstruction Psychoanalysis Freud Foucault Madness Reason |
title_short |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
title_full |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
title_fullStr |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
title_sort |
‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate |
author |
Montalva, Joaquín |
author_facet |
Montalva, Joaquín |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montalva, Joaquín |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Derrida Fort/da deconstrucción psicoanálisis Freud Foucault Locura Razón Fort/da Locura Psicoanálisis Deconstrucción Transferencia Derrida fort/da deconstruction Psychoanalysis Freud Foucault Madness Reason |
topic |
Derrida Fort/da deconstrucción psicoanálisis Freud Foucault Locura Razón Fort/da Locura Psicoanálisis Deconstrucción Transferencia Derrida fort/da deconstruction Psychoanalysis Freud Foucault Madness Reason |
description |
This article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11907 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11967 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11968 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11969 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 46 n. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): April-June/2023; 167-192 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 46 N. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1794795213102776320 |