‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montalva, Joaquín
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339
Resumo: This article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general.
id UNESP-10_6f683217eec9220c8f15c6e0ca515ece
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13339
network_acronym_str UNESP-10
network_name_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso? El fort/da en 'Ser justo con Freud' y en el debate de Derrida/Foucault‘Quem anuncia o não recurso?’: o fort/da em ‘Fazer justiça a Freud’ e no debate Derrida/FoucaultDerridaFort/dadeconstrucciónpsicoanálisisFreudFoucaultLocuraRazónFort/daLocuraPsicoanálisisDeconstrucciónTransferenciaDerridafort/dadeconstructionPsychoanalysisFreudFoucaultMadnessReasonThis article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general.Este articulo consiste en un comentario del ensayo 'Ser justo con Fred: La historia de la locura en la época del psicoanálisis' de Derrida con el fin de seguir las huellas de lo que no puede ser re-apropiado por las premisas de un debate entre Derrida Y Foucault. Al analizar la pregunta '¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso?´, se defenderá que Derrida escribe compulsivamente los efectos de su propia resistencia al reprimir la sinrazón y reproducir la busqueda Foucaultiana de un ´más alla de la razón.' Esta compulsión de reptición no solo mantiene el debate abierto, sino que gatilla el retorno de la sinrazón como un desarreglo del principio de identidad que desastibiliza toda autoria sobre una historia de la locura en general y de todas sus críticas. Este artículo propone leer los intercambios de Derrida y Foucault deconstruyendo las premisas en las que se sostiene todo debate en general.Este artículo consiste en un comentario del ensayo Ser justo con Freud: La historia de la locura en la era del psicoanálisis de Derrida con el objeto de rastrear lo que no puede ser reapropiado por la presuposición del marco del debate entre Derrida y Foucault. Al analizar la pregunta “¿quién anuncia el no-recurso?”, exploraré la forma en que la escritura de Derrida es afectada por la necesidad e imposibilidad de no reprimir la sinrazón. Argumentaré que Derrida compulsivamente escribe los efectos de dicha resistencia a no reprimir la sinrazón a través de la repetición de la búsqueda Foucaultiana de un más allá de la razón. Esta “compulsión de repetición’ no solamente reabre una y otra vez el debate, sino que desencadena el retorno de la sinrazón en la forma de un desarreglo de los principios de identidad y tiempo lineal, desestabilizando todo forma de autoría sobre la historia de la locura en general y cada una de sus críticas. Este artículo se aproxima a los intercambios entre Derrida y Foucault deconstruyendo la premisa de la posibilidad de un debate sobre la historia de la locura.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2023-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 46 n. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): April-June/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 46 N. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-1921980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11907https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11967https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11968https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11969Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontalva, Joaquín2023-06-12T19:09:59Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13339Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-06-12T19:09:59Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
¿Quién anuncia el no-recurso? El fort/da en 'Ser justo con Freud' y en el debate de Derrida/Foucault
‘Quem anuncia o não recurso?’: o fort/da em ‘Fazer justiça a Freud’ e no debate Derrida/Foucault
title ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
spellingShingle ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
Montalva, Joaquín
Derrida
Fort/da
deconstrucción
psicoanálisis
Freud
Foucault
Locura
Razón
Fort/da
Locura
Psicoanálisis
Deconstrucción
Transferencia
Derrida
fort/da
deconstruction
Psychoanalysis
Freud
Foucault
Madness
Reason
title_short ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
title_full ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
title_fullStr ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
title_full_unstemmed ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
title_sort ‘Who Announces the Nonrecourse?’: The fort/da in ‘To do Justice to Freud’ and in the Derrida/Foucault debate
author Montalva, Joaquín
author_facet Montalva, Joaquín
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montalva, Joaquín
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Derrida
Fort/da
deconstrucción
psicoanálisis
Freud
Foucault
Locura
Razón
Fort/da
Locura
Psicoanálisis
Deconstrucción
Transferencia
Derrida
fort/da
deconstruction
Psychoanalysis
Freud
Foucault
Madness
Reason
topic Derrida
Fort/da
deconstrucción
psicoanálisis
Freud
Foucault
Locura
Razón
Fort/da
Locura
Psicoanálisis
Deconstrucción
Transferencia
Derrida
fort/da
deconstruction
Psychoanalysis
Freud
Foucault
Madness
Reason
description This article consists of a commentary on Derrida’s essay “To do Justice to Freud: The History of Madness in the Age of Psychoanalysis”, with the aim of tracing what cannot be re-appropriated by the presuppositions of the Derrida/Foucault debate. By analysing the question “who announces the nonrecourse?”, I will explore the way in which Derrida’s writing is affected by the necessity and impossibility of not repressing unreason. I will defend that Derrida compulsively writes the effects of his own resistance to repress unreason by reproducing the Foucauldian quest for a “beyond of reason”. This repetition compulsion not only keeps re-opening the debate, but more importantly, it triggers the return of unreason as a disarrangement of the principles of identity and linear time which destabilizes any authorial ground for a history of madness in general and for any of its critiques. This article will read the exchanges between Derrida and Foucault by deconstructing the premises of any debate in general.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11907
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11967
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11968
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13339/11969
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/x-mobipocket-ebook
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 46 n. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): April-June/2023; 167-192
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 Núm. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 46 No. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 46 N. 2 (2023): Abril-Junho/2023; 167-192
1980-539X
0101-3173
reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
collection Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv transformacao@marilia.unesp.br
_version_ 1794795213102776320