Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848 |
Resumo: | This articThis article aims to highlight the productivity of falsehood in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The core of the discussion can be summarized in the following statement: if only truths can be drawn from truths, it cannot be said that truth cannot be drawn from falsehood. The central thesis of the text is that the asymmetrical behavior of falsehood promotes the dissociation between the criterion (based on the conservation of truth) and the field of validity so that the latter, broader than the former, incorporates the movement not only from truth to truth, but also from falsehood to falsehood and, above all, from falsehood to truth. The distinction between the symmetrical and asymmetrical fields allows understanding, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies, the separation between demonstration and deduction, the thesis of Popperian fallibilism, and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method. Truth does not have functions analogous to those of falsehood.le aims to highlight how fruitful falsehood is in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The central point proposed here can be summarized by the Aristotelian statement that claims this: "If from the truth one can only take the truth, from falsity, on the other hand, one can take not only the false but also the true" (Prior Analytics, II, 2, 53b 6-8). The distinction between symmetrical and asymmetrical fields is rich in consequences, allowing us to understand, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies and the separation between demonstration and deduction, as well as the thesis of Popperian fallibilism and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method in general. Within this framework, truth does not have functions analogous to falsehood. |
id |
UNESP-10_76ef5f745cb0d5da27cd15e0ec68189b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/14848 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehoodAssimetria entre verdade e falsidade e a fecundidade da falsidadeAsymmetrical behavior of falsehoodDissociation between criterion and field of validityDemonstration versus deductionAsymmetry and the hypothetico-deductive methodFallibilismComportamento assimétrico da falsidadeDissociação entre critério e campo de validadeDemonstração versus deduçãoAssimetria e método hipotético-dedutivoFalibilismoThis articThis article aims to highlight the productivity of falsehood in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The core of the discussion can be summarized in the following statement: if only truths can be drawn from truths, it cannot be said that truth cannot be drawn from falsehood. The central thesis of the text is that the asymmetrical behavior of falsehood promotes the dissociation between the criterion (based on the conservation of truth) and the field of validity so that the latter, broader than the former, incorporates the movement not only from truth to truth, but also from falsehood to falsehood and, above all, from falsehood to truth. The distinction between the symmetrical and asymmetrical fields allows understanding, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies, the separation between demonstration and deduction, the thesis of Popperian fallibilism, and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method. Truth does not have functions analogous to those of falsehood.le aims to highlight how fruitful falsehood is in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The central point proposed here can be summarized by the Aristotelian statement that claims this: "If from the truth one can only take the truth, from falsity, on the other hand, one can take not only the false but also the true" (Prior Analytics, II, 2, 53b 6-8). The distinction between symmetrical and asymmetrical fields is rich in consequences, allowing us to understand, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies and the separation between demonstration and deduction, as well as the thesis of Popperian fallibilism and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method in general. Within this framework, truth does not have functions analogous to falsehood.OO objetivo do artigo é evidenciar quão fecunda é a falsidade, no âmbito de sua posição assimétrica com a verdade. O núcleo da discussão pode ser sintetizado por meio da seguinte afirmação: se de verdades só se podem tirar verdades, não é possível dizer que a verdade não possa ser tirada da falsidade. A tese central do texto é a de que o comportamento assimétrico da falsidade promove a dissociação entre critério (pautado na conservação da verdade) e campo de validade, de modo que este último, mais amplo que o primeiro, incorpore o movimento, não só da verdade para a verdade, mas também de falsidade para a falsidade e, principalmente, de falsidade para verdade. A distinção entre os campos simétrico e assimétrico permite compreender, por exemplo, a emergência de certas falácias lógicas, a separação entre demonstração e dedução, a tese do falibilismo popperiano e o uso do método hipotético-dedutivo. A verdade, definitivamente, não tem funções análogas às da falsidade. objetivo do artigo é evidenciar o quanto é fecunda a falsidade no âmbito de sua posição assimétrica com a verdade. O ponto central aqui proposto pode ser sintetizado pela afirmação aristotélica que diz mais ou menos isto: “se da verdade só se pode tirar a verdade, da falsidade, por outro lado, pode-se tirar não só o falso, mas também o verdadeiro” (Prim. Anal., II, 2, 53b 6-8). A distinção entre os campos simétrico e assimétrico é rica em consequências, nos permitindo compreender, por exemplo, a emergência de certas falácias lógicas e a separação entre demonstração e dedução, bem como a tese do falibilismo popperiano e o uso do método hipotético-dedutivo em geral. Dentro desse quadro, a verdade, definitivamente, não tem funções análogas às da falsidade.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2024-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e0240074TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e0240074TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e0240074TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e0240074TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e02400741980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15945https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15958https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15976https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15977Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesphttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBattisti, César Augusto2024-04-15T03:23:02Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/14848Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2024-04-15T03:23:02Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood Assimetria entre verdade e falsidade e a fecundidade da falsidade |
title |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
spellingShingle |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood Battisti, César Augusto Asymmetrical behavior of falsehood Dissociation between criterion and field of validity Demonstration versus deduction Asymmetry and the hypothetico-deductive method Fallibilism Comportamento assimétrico da falsidade Dissociação entre critério e campo de validade Demonstração versus dedução Assimetria e método hipotético-dedutivo Falibilismo |
title_short |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
title_full |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
title_fullStr |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
title_full_unstemmed |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
title_sort |
Asymmetry between truth and falsehood and the productivity of falsehood |
author |
Battisti, César Augusto |
author_facet |
Battisti, César Augusto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Battisti, César Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Asymmetrical behavior of falsehood Dissociation between criterion and field of validity Demonstration versus deduction Asymmetry and the hypothetico-deductive method Fallibilism Comportamento assimétrico da falsidade Dissociação entre critério e campo de validade Demonstração versus dedução Assimetria e método hipotético-dedutivo Falibilismo |
topic |
Asymmetrical behavior of falsehood Dissociation between criterion and field of validity Demonstration versus deduction Asymmetry and the hypothetico-deductive method Fallibilism Comportamento assimétrico da falsidade Dissociação entre critério e campo de validade Demonstração versus dedução Assimetria e método hipotético-dedutivo Falibilismo |
description |
This articThis article aims to highlight the productivity of falsehood in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The core of the discussion can be summarized in the following statement: if only truths can be drawn from truths, it cannot be said that truth cannot be drawn from falsehood. The central thesis of the text is that the asymmetrical behavior of falsehood promotes the dissociation between the criterion (based on the conservation of truth) and the field of validity so that the latter, broader than the former, incorporates the movement not only from truth to truth, but also from falsehood to falsehood and, above all, from falsehood to truth. The distinction between the symmetrical and asymmetrical fields allows understanding, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies, the separation between demonstration and deduction, the thesis of Popperian fallibilism, and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method. Truth does not have functions analogous to those of falsehood.le aims to highlight how fruitful falsehood is in the context of its asymmetrical position with truth. The central point proposed here can be summarized by the Aristotelian statement that claims this: "If from the truth one can only take the truth, from falsity, on the other hand, one can take not only the false but also the true" (Prior Analytics, II, 2, 53b 6-8). The distinction between symmetrical and asymmetrical fields is rich in consequences, allowing us to understand, for example, the emergence of certain logical fallacies and the separation between demonstration and deduction, as well as the thesis of Popperian fallibilism and the use of the hypothetical-deductive method in general. Within this framework, truth does not have functions analogous to falsehood. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15945 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15958 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15976 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14848/15977 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Continuous flow; e0240074 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2024): Flujo continuo; e0240074 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2024): Flux continu; e0240074 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 47 N. 1 (2024): Flusso continuo; e0240074 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 47 n. 1 (2024): Fluxo Contínuo; e0240074 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214814372397056 |