Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
Resumo: Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.
id UNESP-10_798e5f2cce7e4f967899dd4c488d0d3e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/3629
network_acronym_str UNESP-10
network_name_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a NotionAgambenWittgensteinForm-of-LifePotentialitiesLanguageCommunityGiorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 37 n. 1 (2014); 163-186TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2014); 163-186TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 Núm. 1 (2014); 163-186TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2014); 163-186TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 37 N. 1 (2014); 163-1861980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/2788https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12162https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12405https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12406Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSAIDEL, Matías Leandro2023-04-27T19:50:06Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/3629Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-04-27T19:50:06Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
spellingShingle Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
Agamben
Wittgenstein
Form-of-Life
Potentialities
Language
Community
title_short Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_full Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_fullStr Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_full_unstemmed Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_sort Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
author SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
author_facet SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agamben
Wittgenstein
Form-of-Life
Potentialities
Language
Community
topic Agamben
Wittgenstein
Form-of-Life
Potentialities
Language
Community
description Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/2788
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12162
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12405
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/12406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/x-mobipocket-ebook
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 37 n. 1 (2014); 163-186
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2014); 163-186
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 Núm. 1 (2014); 163-186
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2014); 163-186
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 37 N. 1 (2014); 163-186
1980-539X
0101-3173
reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
collection Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv transformacao@marilia.unesp.br
_version_ 1794795207579926528