Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gracino Junior, Paulo
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Oliveira, Fabrício Roberto Costa, Souza, Carlos Henrique Pereira de
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Estudos de Sociologia
Download full: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/15222
Summary: In recent decades, the sociology of religion has questioned one of its central foundations: the secularization paradigm. The persistence of religiously oriented social movements around the world, including in Europe, seemed to point to the obsolescence of research programs which were based on any version of the secularization theory. Thus, American researchers have rehearsed, since the beginning of the 1980s, a leap out not only of the secularization paradigm, but of sociological theory. The program of studies inaugurated by Stark and Bainbridge aimed precisely at overcoming what they called the “old paradigm”, replacing it with a “new paradigm” based on economic and rational choice theories. In this sense, this article proposes reflections on the limits of the conceptions of the rational choice of religion theory, recovering fundamental propositions from authors of economic sociology, especially Granovetter. It is discussed that the assumptions of economic sociology can consistently contribute to the issues surrounding choice and the religious market, without denying the sociological tradition,though.
id UNESP-12_0d8800ca417ca594d4e06cf84a4460ba
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15222
network_acronym_str UNESP-12
network_name_str Estudos de Sociologia
repository_id_str
spelling Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theoryLazos sin nudos: mercado, racionalidad y adhesión religiosa a partir de la teoría de Mark GranovetterLaços sem nós: mercado, racionalidade e adesão religiosa a partir da teoria de Mark GranovetterSecularizationRational choiceEconomic sociologyReligious marketSecularizaciónEleccion racionalSociología económicaMercado religiosoSecularizaçãoEscolha racionalSociologia econômicaMercado religiosoIn recent decades, the sociology of religion has questioned one of its central foundations: the secularization paradigm. The persistence of religiously oriented social movements around the world, including in Europe, seemed to point to the obsolescence of research programs which were based on any version of the secularization theory. Thus, American researchers have rehearsed, since the beginning of the 1980s, a leap out not only of the secularization paradigm, but of sociological theory. The program of studies inaugurated by Stark and Bainbridge aimed precisely at overcoming what they called the “old paradigm”, replacing it with a “new paradigm” based on economic and rational choice theories. In this sense, this article proposes reflections on the limits of the conceptions of the rational choice of religion theory, recovering fundamental propositions from authors of economic sociology, especially Granovetter. It is discussed that the assumptions of economic sociology can consistently contribute to the issues surrounding choice and the religious market, without denying the sociological tradition,though.En las últimas décadas, la sociología de la religión ha cuestionado uno de sus fundamentos centrales: el paradigma de la secularización. La persistencia de movimientos sociales de orientación religiosa en todo el mundo, incluso en Europa, parecía apuntar a la obsolescencia de los programas de investigación que se basaban en cualquier versión de la teoría de la secularización. En esta línea, los investigadores estadounidenses han ensayado, desde principios de la década de 1980, un salto no solo del paradigma de la secularización, sino de la teoría sociológica. El programa de estudios inaugurado por Stark y Bainbridge apuntaba precisamente a superar lo que llamaron el “viejo paradigma”, reemplazándolo por un “nuevo paradigma” basado en teorías económicas y de elección racional. En este sentido, este artículo propone reflexiones sobre los límites de las concepciones de la teoría de la elección racional de religión, recuperando proposiciones fundamentales de autores de la sociología económica, especialmente Granovetter. Argumentamos que los supuestos de la sociología económica pueden contribuir consistentemente a los problemas que rodean la elección y el mercado religioso, sin por ello renegar de la tradición sociológica.Nas últimas décadas a sociologia da religião viu questionado o paradigma da secularização. A persistência de movimentos sociais religiosamente orientados ao redor do mundo, inclusive na Europa, pareciam apontar para obsolescência de programas de pesquisa que se baseavam em alguma das versões da teoria da secularização. Assim, pesquisadores estadunidenses ensaiaram, desde o início da década de 1980, um salto para fora não só do paradigma da secularização, mas da teoria sociológica. Por exemplo, Rodney Stark e William Bainbridge visavam justamente superar o velho paradigma, substituindo-o por um novo, calcado nas teorias econômica e da escolha racional. Este artigo reflete sobre os limites das concepções da teoria da escolha racional da religião, recuperando proposições fundamentais da sociologia econômica, especialmente, de Mark Granovetter. Argumenta-se que os pressupostos da sociologia econômica podem contribuir de forma consistente para as questões que giram em torno da escolha e do mercado religioso, sem, no entanto, negar a tradição sociológica.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2021-09-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/1522210.52780/res.15222Estudos de Sociologia; v. 26 n. 51 (2021): Dossiê: Religião, espaço público e política: novos desafios históricos e teórico metodológicos1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/15222/11299Copyright (c) 2021 Estudos de Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGracino Junior, PauloOliveira, Fabrício Roberto Costa Souza, Carlos Henrique Pereira de 2021-09-29T12:25:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15222Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2021-09-29T12:25:49Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
Lazos sin nudos: mercado, racionalidad y adhesión religiosa a partir de la teoría de Mark Granovetter
Laços sem nós: mercado, racionalidade e adesão religiosa a partir da teoria de Mark Granovetter
title Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
spellingShingle Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
Gracino Junior, Paulo
Secularization
Rational choice
Economic sociology
Religious market
Secularización
Eleccion racional
Sociología económica
Mercado religioso
Secularização
Escolha racional
Sociologia econômica
Mercado religioso
title_short Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
title_full Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
title_fullStr Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
title_full_unstemmed Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
title_sort Knotless Ties: market, rationality and religious adhesion based on Mark Granovetter’s theory
author Gracino Junior, Paulo
author_facet Gracino Junior, Paulo
Oliveira, Fabrício Roberto Costa
Souza, Carlos Henrique Pereira de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Fabrício Roberto Costa
Souza, Carlos Henrique Pereira de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gracino Junior, Paulo
Oliveira, Fabrício Roberto Costa
Souza, Carlos Henrique Pereira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Secularization
Rational choice
Economic sociology
Religious market
Secularización
Eleccion racional
Sociología económica
Mercado religioso
Secularização
Escolha racional
Sociologia econômica
Mercado religioso
topic Secularization
Rational choice
Economic sociology
Religious market
Secularización
Eleccion racional
Sociología económica
Mercado religioso
Secularização
Escolha racional
Sociologia econômica
Mercado religioso
description In recent decades, the sociology of religion has questioned one of its central foundations: the secularization paradigm. The persistence of religiously oriented social movements around the world, including in Europe, seemed to point to the obsolescence of research programs which were based on any version of the secularization theory. Thus, American researchers have rehearsed, since the beginning of the 1980s, a leap out not only of the secularization paradigm, but of sociological theory. The program of studies inaugurated by Stark and Bainbridge aimed precisely at overcoming what they called the “old paradigm”, replacing it with a “new paradigm” based on economic and rational choice theories. In this sense, this article proposes reflections on the limits of the conceptions of the rational choice of religion theory, recovering fundamental propositions from authors of economic sociology, especially Granovetter. It is discussed that the assumptions of economic sociology can consistently contribute to the issues surrounding choice and the religious market, without denying the sociological tradition,though.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/15222
10.52780/res.15222
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/15222
identifier_str_mv 10.52780/res.15222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/15222/11299
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Estudos de Sociologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Estudos de Sociologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia; v. 26 n. 51 (2021): Dossiê: Religião, espaço público e política: novos desafios históricos e teórico metodológicos
1982-4718
1414-0144
reponame:Estudos de Sociologia
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Estudos de Sociologia
collection Estudos de Sociologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br
_version_ 1788171030544515072