Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casteluci, Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos de Sociologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702
Resumo: The introduction of the plea bargain in Brazilian’s legislation granted prosecutors a type of power generally called discretion. Failure to understand this change has caused difficulties in its analysis. In this article an effort is made to define discretion and review its use as a scientific concept in both the social sciences and legal studies with the goal of providing a better understanding of the subject to the scientific and public debate. Through the critical reading of published works in English as well as from Brazilian researchers that utilize its premises and methods, it is concluded that discretion as a concept has been used in variety of ways and that it is inadequate as an answer to questions that it has helped to ask. Finally, an alternative framework for social analysis is proposed in which discretion is decomposed before being requalified by social theory.
id UNESP-12_65925893074bacb7ac12952ae9fc4558
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11702
network_acronym_str UNESP-12
network_name_str Estudos de Sociologia
repository_id_str
spelling Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysisDiscricionariedad en la justicia criminal: construyendo un cuadro de análisisDiscricionariedade na justiça criminal: construindo um quadro de análiseDiscretionCriminal JusticeSocial TheoryPlea BargainBrazilDiscriminaciónJusticia criminalTeoría socialColaboración premiadaBrasilDiscricionariedadeJustiça CriminalTeoria SocialColaboração PremiadaBrasilThe introduction of the plea bargain in Brazilian’s legislation granted prosecutors a type of power generally called discretion. Failure to understand this change has caused difficulties in its analysis. In this article an effort is made to define discretion and review its use as a scientific concept in both the social sciences and legal studies with the goal of providing a better understanding of the subject to the scientific and public debate. Through the critical reading of published works in English as well as from Brazilian researchers that utilize its premises and methods, it is concluded that discretion as a concept has been used in variety of ways and that it is inadequate as an answer to questions that it has helped to ask. Finally, an alternative framework for social analysis is proposed in which discretion is decomposed before being requalified by social theory.La introducción de la colaboración premiada en Brasil atribuyó sobre todo a los fiscales un tipo de poder generalmente llamado de discreción. La incomprensión respecto a esta modificación ha motivado dificultades en su análisis. En este artículo se hace una revisión acerca del modo en que la discrecionalidad fue abordada por las ciencias sociales y jurídicas con el objetivo de contribuir al desarrollo del debate social y científico en torno al tema. Por medio de la lectura crítica de la producción bibliográfica en lengua inglesa y de los trabajos brasileños que incorporaron sus premisas y métodos, se concluyó que esa categoría admitió gran variedad de significados y es inadecuada para responder a las cuestiones que ella misma ayudó a proponer. Finalmente, se sugirió un cuadro alternativo de análisis en que la discrecionalidad se descompone en sus partes para ser recalificada por la teoría sociológica.A introdução da colaboração premiada no Brasil atribuiu, sobretudo aos promotores e procuradores de justiça, um tipo de poder geralmente chamado de discricionário. A incompreensão a respeito dessa modificação tem motivado dificuldades em sua análise. Neste artigo é feita uma revisão a respeito do modo como a discricionariedade foi abordada pelas ciências sociais e jurídicas com o objetivo de contribuir para o desenvolvimento do debate social e científico em torno do tema. Por meio da leitura crítica da produção bibliográfica em língua inglesa e dos trabalhos brasileiros que incorporaram suas premissas e métodos, concluiu-se que essa categoria admitiu grande variedade de significados e é inadequada para responder às questões que ela mesmo ajudou a propor. Finalmente, foi sugerido um quadro alternativo de análise em que a discricionariedade é decomposta em suas partes para, em seguida, ser requalificada pela teoria sociológica.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2019-02-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/1170210.52780/res.11702Estudos de Sociologia; v. 23 n. 45 (2018): Dossiê: Judicialização da sociedade e da política1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702/8006Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos de Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCasteluci, Eduardo2019-02-14T01:12:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11702Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2019-02-14T01:12:01Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
Discricionariedad en la justicia criminal: construyendo un cuadro de análisis
Discricionariedade na justiça criminal: construindo um quadro de análise
title Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
spellingShingle Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
Casteluci, Eduardo
Discretion
Criminal Justice
Social Theory
Plea Bargain
Brazil
Discriminación
Justicia criminal
Teoría social
Colaboración premiada
Brasil
Discricionariedade
Justiça Criminal
Teoria Social
Colaboração Premiada
Brasil
title_short Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
title_full Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
title_fullStr Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
title_full_unstemmed Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
title_sort Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis
author Casteluci, Eduardo
author_facet Casteluci, Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casteluci, Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discretion
Criminal Justice
Social Theory
Plea Bargain
Brazil
Discriminación
Justicia criminal
Teoría social
Colaboración premiada
Brasil
Discricionariedade
Justiça Criminal
Teoria Social
Colaboração Premiada
Brasil
topic Discretion
Criminal Justice
Social Theory
Plea Bargain
Brazil
Discriminación
Justicia criminal
Teoría social
Colaboración premiada
Brasil
Discricionariedade
Justiça Criminal
Teoria Social
Colaboração Premiada
Brasil
description The introduction of the plea bargain in Brazilian’s legislation granted prosecutors a type of power generally called discretion. Failure to understand this change has caused difficulties in its analysis. In this article an effort is made to define discretion and review its use as a scientific concept in both the social sciences and legal studies with the goal of providing a better understanding of the subject to the scientific and public debate. Through the critical reading of published works in English as well as from Brazilian researchers that utilize its premises and methods, it is concluded that discretion as a concept has been used in variety of ways and that it is inadequate as an answer to questions that it has helped to ask. Finally, an alternative framework for social analysis is proposed in which discretion is decomposed before being requalified by social theory.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702
10.52780/res.11702
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702
identifier_str_mv 10.52780/res.11702
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702/8006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos de Sociologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos de Sociologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia; v. 23 n. 45 (2018): Dossiê: Judicialização da sociedade e da política
1982-4718
1414-0144
reponame:Estudos de Sociologia
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Estudos de Sociologia
collection Estudos de Sociologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br
_version_ 1788171030172270592