Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grill, Igor Gastal
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Reis, Eliana Tavares dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos de Sociologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/14628
Resumo: At the Brazilian recent public scenario, besides the complexity of matters and the spread of spokespeople engaged in defending the Amazon rainforest both in transnational and national spheres, the outlining of a series of controversies about reasons, responsibility and ways to fight against ongoing wildfires and deforestation in the ‘’region’’ was merged. Taking for examination the items of news published on digital media (among other materials) it is possible to perceive emplacement and position taking from collective and individual agents, having placed themselves on opposite and unset (ambivalent at times) sides of the conflicts/debates triggered since 2018 presidential election. We mainly considered the actions of leaders from parliamentary fronts and interest groups, observing discourses, assets and register categories, competing or relationally called on in order to intervene and define the foundations of a cause or legitimate problematic. Thus, it is aimed to unveil intervener principles in the alignments which have marked the feud in a context thought to be ‘’critical’’.
id UNESP-12_cefd20c2a0b5addea78311a335a93c57
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14628
network_acronym_str UNESP-12
network_name_str Estudos de Sociologia
repository_id_str
spelling Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debatesGrandezas y desventuras de la Amazonia: Construcción de significados y representación de intereses en el debate político recienteGrandezas e desventuras da Amazônia: construção de sentidos e representação de interesses no debate político recentePolitical sociologyControversiesRepresentation of InterestsBattles for MeaningThe Amazon rainforestSociología políticaControversiasRepresentación de interesesDisputas por los significadosAmazoníaSociologia PolíticaControvérsiasRepresentação de interessesDisputas por sentidosAmazôniaAt the Brazilian recent public scenario, besides the complexity of matters and the spread of spokespeople engaged in defending the Amazon rainforest both in transnational and national spheres, the outlining of a series of controversies about reasons, responsibility and ways to fight against ongoing wildfires and deforestation in the ‘’region’’ was merged. Taking for examination the items of news published on digital media (among other materials) it is possible to perceive emplacement and position taking from collective and individual agents, having placed themselves on opposite and unset (ambivalent at times) sides of the conflicts/debates triggered since 2018 presidential election. We mainly considered the actions of leaders from parliamentary fronts and interest groups, observing discourses, assets and register categories, competing or relationally called on in order to intervene and define the foundations of a cause or legitimate problematic. Thus, it is aimed to unveil intervener principles in the alignments which have marked the feud in a context thought to be ‘’critical’’.En el reciente escenario público brasileño, la complejización de los temas y la proliferación de portavoces llamados a defender la Amazonia, a nivel transnacional y nacional, se han combinado con la delineación de una configuración de controversias sobre las razones, los responsables y las formas de combatir los incendios forestales en la “región”. Tomando para el examen, en particular, los artículos publicados en los medios de prensa digital (entre otros materiales), nos apoderamos de las posiciones y los posicionamientos de los agentes (individuales y colectivos), que se colocaron en polos opuestos y no fijos (eventualmente, incluso ambivalentes) en los debates/enfrentamientos que han estallado desde las elecciones presidenciales de 2018. Principalmente, consideramos las acciones de los líderes inscritos en los frentes parlamentarios y grupos de interés, prestando atención a los discursos, triunfos y modalidades de inscripción, activados relacional y competitivamente, para intervenir y definir las bases de construcción de una causa o problema legítimo. De este modo, pretendemos señalar los principios que intervienen en las alineaciones que marcaron la disputa en un contexto considerado “crítico”.No cenário público brasileiro recente, conjugou-se à complexificação de questões e à proliferação de porta-vozes interpelados a defender a Amazônia, nos planos transnacional e nacional, o delineamento de uma configuração de controvérsias sobre razões, responsáveis e formas de combate das queimadas na “região”. Tomando para exame, notadamente, matérias publicadas em meios de imprensa digital (entre outros materiais), apreendemos posições e posicionamentos de agentes (individuais e coletivos), que se alocaram em polos opostos e não fixos (eventualmente, até ambivalentes) nos debates/embates deflagrados desde as eleições presidenciais de 2018. Principalmente, consideramos a atuação de lideranças inscritas em frentes parlamentares e grupos de interesses, atentando aos discursos, trunfos e modalidades de inscrição, relacional e concorrencialmente acionadas, com vistas a intervir e definir as bases de construção de uma causa ou problemática legítima. Buscamos, assim, apontar princípios intervenientes nos alinhamentos que marcaram a contenda em um contexto considerado crítico.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2021-05-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/1462810.52780/res.14628Estudos de Sociologia; v. 26 n. 50 (2021): Dossiê: Participação política no Brasil: mudanças e permanências nos padrões de ativismo político1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/14628/10789Grill, Igor GastalReis, Eliana Tavares dos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-25T14:29:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14628Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2021-05-25T14:29:44Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
Grandezas y desventuras de la Amazonia: Construcción de significados y representación de intereses en el debate político reciente
Grandezas e desventuras da Amazônia: construção de sentidos e representação de interesses no debate político recente
title Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
spellingShingle Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
Grill, Igor Gastal
Political sociology
Controversies
Representation of Interests
Battles for Meaning
The Amazon rainforest
Sociología política
Controversias
Representación de intereses
Disputas por los significados
Amazonía
Sociologia Política
Controvérsias
Representação de interesses
Disputas por sentidos
Amazônia
title_short Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
title_full Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
title_fullStr Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
title_full_unstemmed Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
title_sort Greatnesses and misfortunes of the Amazon Rainforest: The construction of purposes and the representation of interests in the latest political debates
author Grill, Igor Gastal
author_facet Grill, Igor Gastal
Reis, Eliana Tavares dos
author_role author
author2 Reis, Eliana Tavares dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grill, Igor Gastal
Reis, Eliana Tavares dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Political sociology
Controversies
Representation of Interests
Battles for Meaning
The Amazon rainforest
Sociología política
Controversias
Representación de intereses
Disputas por los significados
Amazonía
Sociologia Política
Controvérsias
Representação de interesses
Disputas por sentidos
Amazônia
topic Political sociology
Controversies
Representation of Interests
Battles for Meaning
The Amazon rainforest
Sociología política
Controversias
Representación de intereses
Disputas por los significados
Amazonía
Sociologia Política
Controvérsias
Representação de interesses
Disputas por sentidos
Amazônia
description At the Brazilian recent public scenario, besides the complexity of matters and the spread of spokespeople engaged in defending the Amazon rainforest both in transnational and national spheres, the outlining of a series of controversies about reasons, responsibility and ways to fight against ongoing wildfires and deforestation in the ‘’region’’ was merged. Taking for examination the items of news published on digital media (among other materials) it is possible to perceive emplacement and position taking from collective and individual agents, having placed themselves on opposite and unset (ambivalent at times) sides of the conflicts/debates triggered since 2018 presidential election. We mainly considered the actions of leaders from parliamentary fronts and interest groups, observing discourses, assets and register categories, competing or relationally called on in order to intervene and define the foundations of a cause or legitimate problematic. Thus, it is aimed to unveil intervener principles in the alignments which have marked the feud in a context thought to be ‘’critical’’.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/14628
10.52780/res.14628
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/14628
identifier_str_mv 10.52780/res.14628
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/14628/10789
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia; v. 26 n. 50 (2021): Dossiê: Participação política no Brasil: mudanças e permanências nos padrões de ativismo político
1982-4718
1414-0144
reponame:Estudos de Sociologia
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Estudos de Sociologia
collection Estudos de Sociologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br
_version_ 1788171030495232000

Registros relacionados