Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos de Sociologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351 |
Resumo: | Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights. |
id |
UNESP-12_e49ff096e7818f9d1cdad7456d068bd9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/351 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-12 |
network_name_str |
Estudos de Sociologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira ViannaAs origens da discussão do componente social da democracia brasileira: a querela entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira ViannaRui BarbosaOliveira ViannaLiberalismCorporativismDemocracySocial citizenshipRui BarbosaOliveira ViannaLiberalismoCorporativismoDemocraciaCidadaniaOrigins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights.Este trabalho recupera a polêmica entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira Vianna, na origem do debate, no pensamento brasileiro relativo à dimensão social da democracia. Antecede a substituição de um regime político liberal, defendido por Rui Barbosa, por um modelo corporativo, instituidor de direitos sociais, sustentado por Oliveira Vianna. Esses intelectuais revelaram-se “porta-vozes” das representações da sociedade sobre o tema, criando uma cultura política em que ainda são defi nidos os termos desse debate no Brasil. A concepção individualista de Barbosa propõe um regime político baseado no mecanismo das instituições “eletivas” clássicas da democracia representativa. O esforço intelectual de Vianna apresenta um modelo alternativo, enraizado na “realidade social”, cuja conseqüência histórica resulta na instalação de um Estado centralizado e corporativo. Destacamos a necessidade de uma síntese que conjugue ambas as dimensões: a liberal, comprometida com a proteção das liberdades civis e políticas; e a tradição “corporativa”, empenhada no aprofundamento dos direitos sociais.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2007-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351Estudos de Sociologia; v. 12 n. 22 (2007)1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351/215Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Letícia Godinho de2021-05-12T13:46:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/351Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2021-05-12T13:46:11Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna As origens da discussão do componente social da democracia brasileira: a querela entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira Vianna |
title |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
spellingShingle |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna Souza, Letícia Godinho de Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalism Corporativism Democracy Social citizenship Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalismo Corporativismo Democracia Cidadania |
title_short |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
title_full |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
title_fullStr |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
title_full_unstemmed |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
title_sort |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna |
author |
Souza, Letícia Godinho de |
author_facet |
Souza, Letícia Godinho de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Letícia Godinho de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalism Corporativism Democracy Social citizenship Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalismo Corporativismo Democracia Cidadania |
topic |
Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalism Corporativism Democracy Social citizenship Rui Barbosa Oliveira Vianna Liberalismo Corporativismo Democracia Cidadania |
description |
Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-09-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351/215 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Sociologia; v. 12 n. 22 (2007) 1982-4718 1414-0144 reponame:Estudos de Sociologia instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Estudos de Sociologia |
collection |
Estudos de Sociologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788171028211433472 |