Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Letícia Godinho de
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos de Sociologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351
Resumo: Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights.
id UNESP-12_e49ff096e7818f9d1cdad7456d068bd9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/351
network_acronym_str UNESP-12
network_name_str Estudos de Sociologia
repository_id_str
spelling Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira ViannaAs origens da discussão do componente social da democracia brasileira: a querela entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira ViannaRui BarbosaOliveira ViannaLiberalismCorporativismDemocracySocial citizenshipRui BarbosaOliveira ViannaLiberalismoCorporativismoDemocraciaCidadaniaOrigins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights.Este trabalho recupera a polêmica entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira Vianna, na origem do debate, no pensamento brasileiro relativo à dimensão social da democracia. Antecede a substituição de um regime político liberal, defendido por Rui Barbosa, por um modelo corporativo, instituidor de direitos sociais, sustentado por Oliveira Vianna. Esses intelectuais revelaram-se “porta-vozes” das representações da sociedade sobre o tema, criando uma cultura política em que ainda são defi nidos os termos desse debate no Brasil. A concepção individualista de Barbosa propõe um regime político baseado no mecanismo das instituições “eletivas” clássicas da democracia representativa. O esforço intelectual de Vianna apresenta um modelo alternativo, enraizado na “realidade social”, cuja conseqüência histórica resulta na instalação de um Estado centralizado e corporativo. Destacamos a necessidade de uma síntese que conjugue ambas as dimensões: a liberal, comprometida com a proteção das liberdades civis e políticas; e a tradição “corporativa”, empenhada no aprofundamento dos direitos sociais.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2007-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351Estudos de Sociologia; v. 12 n. 22 (2007)1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351/215Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Letícia Godinho de2021-05-12T13:46:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/351Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2021-05-12T13:46:11Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
As origens da discussão do componente social da democracia brasileira: a querela entre Rui Barbosa e Oliveira Vianna
title Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
spellingShingle Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
Souza, Letícia Godinho de
Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalism
Corporativism
Democracy
Social citizenship
Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalismo
Corporativismo
Democracia
Cidadania
title_short Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
title_full Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
title_fullStr Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
title_full_unstemmed Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
title_sort Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna
author Souza, Letícia Godinho de
author_facet Souza, Letícia Godinho de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Letícia Godinho de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalism
Corporativism
Democracy
Social citizenship
Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalismo
Corporativismo
Democracia
Cidadania
topic Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalism
Corporativism
Democracy
Social citizenship
Rui Barbosa
Oliveira Vianna
Liberalismo
Corporativismo
Democracia
Cidadania
description Origins of the debate on the social component in brazilian democracy: the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna This article deals with the controversy between Rui Barbosa and Oliveira Vianna, which lays on the basis of the debate about the social dimension of democracy in Brazilian political thinking. It anticipates the substitution of the liberal regime – sustained by Rui Barbosa – by a corporative one – advocated by Oliveira Vianna. These thinkers appear as representative of the different opinions harbored within the society about this question, creating a political culture that still nowadays establishes the terms of the debate. The individualist view of Barbosa proposes a political regime based on the classical elective mechanism of representative democracy. Vianna’s intellectual effort constitutes an alternate model, rooted in “social reality”, which historically contributed to the instauration of a centralized corporative state. We conclude by standing up for the necessity of a synthesis between both dimensions: the liberal one that defends the civil and political liberties, and the “corporative” tradition that supports the deepening of social rights.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-09-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/351/215
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2007 Estudos de Sociologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia; v. 12 n. 22 (2007)
1982-4718
1414-0144
reponame:Estudos de Sociologia
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Estudos de Sociologia
collection Estudos de Sociologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br
_version_ 1788171028211433472