Algorithmic bias: a provisional review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos de Sociologia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/13402 |
Resumo: | This paper stands in the field of Digital Sociology and proposes to carry out a provisional bibliographic review on algorithmic bias, based on the main journals databases in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Our aim is to assess how the debate on algorithmic bias in the Humanities has developed, observing which definitions, origins, diagnostics and perspectives are presented for the phenomenon. It is observed that the majority of articles are of essayistic nature and produced in the Global North, with a low penetration of the subject in Spanish and Portuguese language literature. The expression remains broadly undefined, and is sometimes treated as synonymous with discrimination, sometimes as its cause. The main sources of bias are, according to the literature, the model development and its training data, which largely lead to recommendations for increasing transparency about the process and suggest an analytical tendency to emphasize the subjective character of algorithmic bias. There seems to be an analytical tendency in the subjective character of bias. As a perspective, we point out the importance of integrating the elements transcending the subjectivity of these actors to this analysis. |
id |
UNESP-12_f2de77480dd82b20b7e88f96ecf5b2e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13402 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-12 |
network_name_str |
Estudos de Sociologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional reviewSesgo algorítmico: una síntesis provisionalViés algorítmico – um balanço provisórioAlgorithmic biasAlgorithmDiscriminationDigital SociologySesgo algorítmicoAlgoritmoDiscriminaciónSociología digitalViés algorítmicoAlgoritmoDiscriminaçãoSociologia DigitalThis paper stands in the field of Digital Sociology and proposes to carry out a provisional bibliographic review on algorithmic bias, based on the main journals databases in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Our aim is to assess how the debate on algorithmic bias in the Humanities has developed, observing which definitions, origins, diagnostics and perspectives are presented for the phenomenon. It is observed that the majority of articles are of essayistic nature and produced in the Global North, with a low penetration of the subject in Spanish and Portuguese language literature. The expression remains broadly undefined, and is sometimes treated as synonymous with discrimination, sometimes as its cause. The main sources of bias are, according to the literature, the model development and its training data, which largely lead to recommendations for increasing transparency about the process and suggest an analytical tendency to emphasize the subjective character of algorithmic bias. There seems to be an analytical tendency in the subjective character of bias. As a perspective, we point out the importance of integrating the elements transcending the subjectivity of these actors to this analysis.Este artículo se sitúa en el campo de la Sociología Digital y propone realizar una revisión bibliográfica provisional sobre el sesgo algorítmico, basada en los principales portales de revistas en inglés, español y portugués. El objetivo es seguir el desarrollo del debate sobre el sesgo algorítmico en las Humanidades, observando las definiciones, los orígenes, los diagnósticos y las perspectivas presentadas para el fenómeno. El resultado fue que la mayoría de los artículos es de naturaleza ensayística, producidos en el Norte Global, con baja penetración del tema en la literatura en español y portugués. Hay una gran falta de definición del término, que por veces se trata como sinónimo de discriminación, por veces como su causa. Las principales fuentes de sesgo presentadas son la construcción de la herramienta y sus datos de capacitación, lo que en gran medida da lugar a sugerencias para aumentar la transparencia del proceso y sugiere una tendencia analítica a subrayar el carácter subjetivo del sesgo algorítmico. Parece haber una tendencia analítica en el carácter subjetivo del sesgo. Como perspectiva, señalamos la importancia de integrar en el análisis elementos que trasciendan la subjetividad de estos actores.Este artigo se insere no campo da Sociologia Digital e objetiva realizar um balanço bibliográfico sobre viés algorítmico (algorithmic bias) nas Humanidades, observando quais definições, causas, diagnósticos e perspectivas são apresentadas para o fenômeno. Tomando por base artigos presentes nos principais portais de periódicos nas línguas inglesa, espanhola e portuguesa, foram encontrados majoritariamente artigos de cunho ensaístico, produzidos no Norte Global, com baixa penetração da temática nas literaturas em espanhol e português. Percebe-se certa indefinição sobre o termo, ora tratado como sinônimo de discriminação, ora como sua causa. Como principais fontes de viés, foram identificadas a construção de ferramentas e os dados de treinamento. Esses fatores ressaltam a necessidade de aumentar a transparência no desenvolvimento de algoritmos; ademais, sugerem tendência analítica de enfatizar o caráter subjetivo do viés algorítmico. Esses achados salientam a importância de integrar à análise elementos que transcendem a subjetividade desses atores.FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial2020-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/1340210.52780/res.13402Estudos de Sociologia; v. 25 n. 48 (2020): Dossiê: Sociologia digital: tópicos e abordagens teórico-metodológicas da pesquisa social no século XXI1982-47181414-0144reponame:Estudos de Sociologiainstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/13402/9352Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos de Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimões-Gomes, LetíciaRoberto, EnricoMendonça, Jônatas2020-07-24T18:15:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13402Revistahttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudosPUBhttp://seer.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/oaistraud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br1982-47181414-0144opendoar:2020-07-24T18:15:15Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review Sesgo algorítmico: una síntesis provisional Viés algorítmico – um balanço provisório |
title |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
spellingShingle |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review Simões-Gomes, Letícia Algorithmic bias Algorithm Discrimination Digital Sociology Sesgo algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminación Sociología digital Viés algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminação Sociologia Digital |
title_short |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
title_full |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
title_fullStr |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
title_sort |
Algorithmic bias: a provisional review |
author |
Simões-Gomes, Letícia |
author_facet |
Simões-Gomes, Letícia Roberto, Enrico Mendonça, Jônatas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Roberto, Enrico Mendonça, Jônatas |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões-Gomes, Letícia Roberto, Enrico Mendonça, Jônatas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Algorithmic bias Algorithm Discrimination Digital Sociology Sesgo algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminación Sociología digital Viés algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminação Sociologia Digital |
topic |
Algorithmic bias Algorithm Discrimination Digital Sociology Sesgo algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminación Sociología digital Viés algorítmico Algoritmo Discriminação Sociologia Digital |
description |
This paper stands in the field of Digital Sociology and proposes to carry out a provisional bibliographic review on algorithmic bias, based on the main journals databases in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Our aim is to assess how the debate on algorithmic bias in the Humanities has developed, observing which definitions, origins, diagnostics and perspectives are presented for the phenomenon. It is observed that the majority of articles are of essayistic nature and produced in the Global North, with a low penetration of the subject in Spanish and Portuguese language literature. The expression remains broadly undefined, and is sometimes treated as synonymous with discrimination, sometimes as its cause. The main sources of bias are, according to the literature, the model development and its training data, which largely lead to recommendations for increasing transparency about the process and suggest an analytical tendency to emphasize the subjective character of algorithmic bias. There seems to be an analytical tendency in the subjective character of bias. As a perspective, we point out the importance of integrating the elements transcending the subjectivity of these actors to this analysis. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/13402 10.52780/res.13402 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/13402 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.52780/res.13402 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/13402/9352 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos de Sociologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos de Sociologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FCL-UNESP Laboratório Editorial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Sociologia; v. 25 n. 48 (2020): Dossiê: Sociologia digital: tópicos e abordagens teórico-metodológicas da pesquisa social no século XXI 1982-4718 1414-0144 reponame:Estudos de Sociologia instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Estudos de Sociologia |
collection |
Estudos de Sociologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Sociologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
straud.fclar@unesp.br||estudosdesociologia@fclar.unesp.br||maria.jardim@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788171030272933888 |