Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000400223 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction A better tension distribution on implants and abutments in implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis is essential in the rehabilitation of posterior mandible area. Objective: To evaluate the influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zircônia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis using the 3-D finite element method. Material and method: Four models were made based on tomographic slices of the posterior mandible with a zirconia custom three-fixed screw-retained partial prosthesis. The investigated factors of the in silico study were: cantilever position (mesial or distal) and implant connection (external hexagon or morse taper). 100 N vertical load to premolar and 300 N to molar were used to simulate the occlusal force in each model to evaluate the distribution of stresses in implants, abutments, screws and cortical and cancellous bone. Result: The external hexagon (EH) connection showed higher cortical compression stress when compared to the morse taper (MT). For both connections, the molar cantilever position had the highest cortical compression. The maximum stress peak concentration was located at the cervical bone in contact with the threads of the first implant. The prosthetic and abutment screws associated with the molar cantilevers showed the highest stress concentration, especially with the EH connection. Conclusion: Morse taper implant connetions associated with a mesial cantilever showed a more favorable treatment option for posterior mandible rehabilitation. |
id |
UNESP-16_05d42fc9ab8fe5d367b46e87117e533d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-25772018000400223 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysisDental implant-abutment designfinite element analysiszirconiaAbstract Introduction A better tension distribution on implants and abutments in implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis is essential in the rehabilitation of posterior mandible area. Objective: To evaluate the influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zircônia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis using the 3-D finite element method. Material and method: Four models were made based on tomographic slices of the posterior mandible with a zirconia custom three-fixed screw-retained partial prosthesis. The investigated factors of the in silico study were: cantilever position (mesial or distal) and implant connection (external hexagon or morse taper). 100 N vertical load to premolar and 300 N to molar were used to simulate the occlusal force in each model to evaluate the distribution of stresses in implants, abutments, screws and cortical and cancellous bone. Result: The external hexagon (EH) connection showed higher cortical compression stress when compared to the morse taper (MT). For both connections, the molar cantilever position had the highest cortical compression. The maximum stress peak concentration was located at the cervical bone in contact with the threads of the first implant. The prosthetic and abutment screws associated with the molar cantilevers showed the highest stress concentration, especially with the EH connection. Conclusion: Morse taper implant connetions associated with a mesial cantilever showed a more favorable treatment option for posterior mandible rehabilitation.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000400223Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.47 n.4 2018reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.06718info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBASTOS,Juliana Maria CoutinhoBORDIN,DimorvanVASCONCELLOS,Andréa Araújo deMIRANDA,Milton Edsoneng2018-11-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772018000400223Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2018-11-23T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
title |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
spellingShingle |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis BASTOS,Juliana Maria Coutinho Dental implant-abutment design finite element analysis zirconia |
title_short |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
title_full |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
title_fullStr |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
title_sort |
Influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis: in silico analysis |
author |
BASTOS,Juliana Maria Coutinho |
author_facet |
BASTOS,Juliana Maria Coutinho BORDIN,Dimorvan VASCONCELLOS,Andréa Araújo de MIRANDA,Milton Edson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BORDIN,Dimorvan VASCONCELLOS,Andréa Araújo de MIRANDA,Milton Edson |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BASTOS,Juliana Maria Coutinho BORDIN,Dimorvan VASCONCELLOS,Andréa Araújo de MIRANDA,Milton Edson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implant-abutment design finite element analysis zirconia |
topic |
Dental implant-abutment design finite element analysis zirconia |
description |
Abstract Introduction A better tension distribution on implants and abutments in implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis is essential in the rehabilitation of posterior mandible area. Objective: To evaluate the influence of cantilever position and implant connection in a zircônia custom implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis using the 3-D finite element method. Material and method: Four models were made based on tomographic slices of the posterior mandible with a zirconia custom three-fixed screw-retained partial prosthesis. The investigated factors of the in silico study were: cantilever position (mesial or distal) and implant connection (external hexagon or morse taper). 100 N vertical load to premolar and 300 N to molar were used to simulate the occlusal force in each model to evaluate the distribution of stresses in implants, abutments, screws and cortical and cancellous bone. Result: The external hexagon (EH) connection showed higher cortical compression stress when compared to the morse taper (MT). For both connections, the molar cantilever position had the highest cortical compression. The maximum stress peak concentration was located at the cervical bone in contact with the threads of the first implant. The prosthetic and abutment screws associated with the molar cantilevers showed the highest stress concentration, especially with the EH connection. Conclusion: Morse taper implant connetions associated with a mesial cantilever showed a more favorable treatment option for posterior mandible rehabilitation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000400223 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000400223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-2577.06718 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.47 n.4 2018 reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
collection |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||adriana@foar.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1748958560824328192 |