Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces. |
id |
UNESP-16_3368e4dc82a3ceff7e6d39110fd354a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100406 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surfaceMicrobiologyantimicrobial agentsmouth rinsesbiofilmsAbstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.13018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de SouzaCARVALHO,Marília Souza deOLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini dePUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina MariaHÖFLING,José FranciscoMATTOS-GRANER,Renata de OliveiraSTIPP,Rafael Nóbregaeng2019-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100406Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2019-04-29T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
title |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza Microbiology antimicrobial agents mouth rinses biofilms |
title_short |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
title_full |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface |
author |
ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza |
author_facet |
ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza CARVALHO,Marília Souza de OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria HÖFLING,José Francisco MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CARVALHO,Marília Souza de OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria HÖFLING,José Francisco MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza CARVALHO,Marília Souza de OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria HÖFLING,José Francisco MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Microbiology antimicrobial agents mouth rinses biofilms |
topic |
Microbiology antimicrobial agents mouth rinses biofilms |
description |
Abstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-2577.13018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019 reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
collection |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||adriana@foar.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1748958560849494016 |