Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: CARVALHO,Marília Souza de, OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de, PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria, HÖFLING,José Francisco, MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira, STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces.
id UNESP-16_3368e4dc82a3ceff7e6d39110fd354a2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100406
network_acronym_str UNESP-16
network_name_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository_id_str
spelling Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surfaceMicrobiologyantimicrobial agentsmouth rinsesbiofilmsAbstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.13018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de SouzaCARVALHO,Marília Souza deOLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini dePUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina MariaHÖFLING,José FranciscoMATTOS-GRANER,Renata de OliveiraSTIPP,Rafael Nóbregaeng2019-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100406Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2019-04-29T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
title Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
spellingShingle Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza
Microbiology
antimicrobial agents
mouth rinses
biofilms
title_short Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
title_full Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
title_sort Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface
author ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza
author_facet ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza
CARVALHO,Marília Souza de
OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de
PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria
HÖFLING,José Francisco
MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira
STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega
author_role author
author2 CARVALHO,Marília Souza de
OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de
PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria
HÖFLING,José Francisco
MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira
STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ARAÚJO,Isaac Jordão de Souza
CARVALHO,Marília Souza de
OLIVEIRA,Thaís Rossini de
PUPPIN-RONTANI,Regina Maria
HÖFLING,José Francisco
MATTOS-GRANER,Renata de Oliveira
STIPP,Rafael Nóbrega
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microbiology
antimicrobial agents
mouth rinses
biofilms
topic Microbiology
antimicrobial agents
mouth rinses
biofilms
description Abstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100406
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-2577.13018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019
reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
collection Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||adriana@foar.unesp.br
_version_ 1748958560849494016