The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MATUMOTO,Marçal Seitaro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: MENDONÇA,Márcio José, BUSATO,Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro, LAURINDO,Brenda Matsunaga, CAMILOTTI,Veridiana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000600395
Resumo: Abstract Introduction There is a growing demand for aesthetic restorations and the polymerized composite resins are the most used material in these procedures. In order to achieve greater resistance to solubilization proper polymerization is required. Objective Evaluate the influence of three photoactivation techniques, on sorption and solubility of three composite resins. Materials and methods 90 test samples measuring 8 mm diameter and 1 mm thick were made and divided into 9 groups (n=10) of resins -Filtek Z350 XT, Tetric N-Ceram and IPS Empress Direct, each of them was polymerized with LED Bluephase, using the techniques: Conventional, Soft-Start (SS) and Pulse Delay (PD). Afterwards they were placed in desiccator with silica gel at 98.6 F and weighed daily until obtaining a constant mass (m1). Then they were immersed in deionized water for seven days and weighed again (m2). The test sample reconditioning was performed using the m1 procedure, until a constant mass (m3 ) was obtained. The sorption and solubility values were calculated and subjected to ANOVA test (two-way), followed by Tukey post hoc, p<0.05. Result There were no statistically significant differences in sorption and solubility among the studied resins when photoactivation techniques were compared. For solubility analysis, statistically significant differences were observed among the materials. The results for composite resin Filtek Z350 XT presented higher statistical hybridization values than those of the other evaluated resins. Conclusion The different forms of photoactivation had no influence on the sorption and solubility of the tested composite resins.
id UNESP-16_bb199fca05fb1915350ee2f569f7a335
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-25772018000600395
network_acronym_str UNESP-16
network_name_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository_id_str
spelling The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resinsComposite resinlight polymerizationwater sorptionsolubilityAbstract Introduction There is a growing demand for aesthetic restorations and the polymerized composite resins are the most used material in these procedures. In order to achieve greater resistance to solubilization proper polymerization is required. Objective Evaluate the influence of three photoactivation techniques, on sorption and solubility of three composite resins. Materials and methods 90 test samples measuring 8 mm diameter and 1 mm thick were made and divided into 9 groups (n=10) of resins -Filtek Z350 XT, Tetric N-Ceram and IPS Empress Direct, each of them was polymerized with LED Bluephase, using the techniques: Conventional, Soft-Start (SS) and Pulse Delay (PD). Afterwards they were placed in desiccator with silica gel at 98.6 F and weighed daily until obtaining a constant mass (m1). Then they were immersed in deionized water for seven days and weighed again (m2). The test sample reconditioning was performed using the m1 procedure, until a constant mass (m3 ) was obtained. The sorption and solubility values were calculated and subjected to ANOVA test (two-way), followed by Tukey post hoc, p<0.05. Result There were no statistically significant differences in sorption and solubility among the studied resins when photoactivation techniques were compared. For solubility analysis, statistically significant differences were observed among the materials. The results for composite resin Filtek Z350 XT presented higher statistical hybridization values than those of the other evaluated resins. Conclusion The different forms of photoactivation had no influence on the sorption and solubility of the tested composite resins.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000600395Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.47 n.6 2018reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.11718info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMATUMOTO,Marçal SeitaroMENDONÇA,Márcio JoséBUSATO,Priscilla do Monte RibeiroLAURINDO,Brenda MatsunagaCAMILOTTI,Veridianaeng2019-02-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772018000600395Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2019-02-21T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
title The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
spellingShingle The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
MATUMOTO,Marçal Seitaro
Composite resin
light polymerization
water sorption
solubility
title_short The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
title_full The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
title_fullStr The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
title_full_unstemmed The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
title_sort The influence of three photoactivation techniques on the sorption and solubility of different composite resins
author MATUMOTO,Marçal Seitaro
author_facet MATUMOTO,Marçal Seitaro
MENDONÇA,Márcio José
BUSATO,Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro
LAURINDO,Brenda Matsunaga
CAMILOTTI,Veridiana
author_role author
author2 MENDONÇA,Márcio José
BUSATO,Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro
LAURINDO,Brenda Matsunaga
CAMILOTTI,Veridiana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MATUMOTO,Marçal Seitaro
MENDONÇA,Márcio José
BUSATO,Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro
LAURINDO,Brenda Matsunaga
CAMILOTTI,Veridiana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite resin
light polymerization
water sorption
solubility
topic Composite resin
light polymerization
water sorption
solubility
description Abstract Introduction There is a growing demand for aesthetic restorations and the polymerized composite resins are the most used material in these procedures. In order to achieve greater resistance to solubilization proper polymerization is required. Objective Evaluate the influence of three photoactivation techniques, on sorption and solubility of three composite resins. Materials and methods 90 test samples measuring 8 mm diameter and 1 mm thick were made and divided into 9 groups (n=10) of resins -Filtek Z350 XT, Tetric N-Ceram and IPS Empress Direct, each of them was polymerized with LED Bluephase, using the techniques: Conventional, Soft-Start (SS) and Pulse Delay (PD). Afterwards they were placed in desiccator with silica gel at 98.6 F and weighed daily until obtaining a constant mass (m1). Then they were immersed in deionized water for seven days and weighed again (m2). The test sample reconditioning was performed using the m1 procedure, until a constant mass (m3 ) was obtained. The sorption and solubility values were calculated and subjected to ANOVA test (two-way), followed by Tukey post hoc, p<0.05. Result There were no statistically significant differences in sorption and solubility among the studied resins when photoactivation techniques were compared. For solubility analysis, statistically significant differences were observed among the materials. The results for composite resin Filtek Z350 XT presented higher statistical hybridization values than those of the other evaluated resins. Conclusion The different forms of photoactivation had no influence on the sorption and solubility of the tested composite resins.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000600395
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772018000600395
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-2577.11718
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.47 n.6 2018
reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
collection Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||adriana@foar.unesp.br
_version_ 1748958560790773760