Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100425 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction Making accurate and dimensionally stable impressions to duplicate oral conditions and tooth morphology is an essential step of prosthetic dentistry for fabricating well-fitted indirect restorations and, consequently, ensure the longevity and success of the treatment. Several authors describe pros and cons of different impression techniques, although there is no unanimity among them about the best one. Objective This study evaluated casts’ accuracy made by different impression techniques, trays and materials. Material and method 10 patients were selected and 20 impressions from teeth #13 to #16 were performed using single-step (SS) and two-step techniques, made with metal stock and customized acrylic resin partial trays, vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone rubbers. Type IV gypsum was used to pour the casts. Three photographs of each patient (baseline), as their respective gypsum casts, were taken, measured in their interested buccal surface area. Comparisons of area values among experimental groups and baseline were performed. Data showed adherence to normal curve, being submitted to 3-way ANOVA/Bonferroni test (α=.05). Result Technique produced significant differences (P=0.02). SS technique was more accurate than BUR one (P=0.003; 95=1.22 to 5.98), but both resulted in similar casts to PVC, MOV and NR techniques, which were similar to each other (P>0.05). Conclusion SS technique showed the closest absolute values to baseline. |
id |
UNESP-16_e0f28de7cdcba43622986ca378ce87ee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100425 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically madeDental impression materialssilicone elastomersdental impression techniquemeasurements, methods and theoriesAbstract Introduction Making accurate and dimensionally stable impressions to duplicate oral conditions and tooth morphology is an essential step of prosthetic dentistry for fabricating well-fitted indirect restorations and, consequently, ensure the longevity and success of the treatment. Several authors describe pros and cons of different impression techniques, although there is no unanimity among them about the best one. Objective This study evaluated casts’ accuracy made by different impression techniques, trays and materials. Material and method 10 patients were selected and 20 impressions from teeth #13 to #16 were performed using single-step (SS) and two-step techniques, made with metal stock and customized acrylic resin partial trays, vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone rubbers. Type IV gypsum was used to pour the casts. Three photographs of each patient (baseline), as their respective gypsum casts, were taken, measured in their interested buccal surface area. Comparisons of area values among experimental groups and baseline were performed. Data showed adherence to normal curve, being submitted to 3-way ANOVA/Bonferroni test (α=.05). Result Technique produced significant differences (P=0.02). SS technique was more accurate than BUR one (P=0.003; 95=1.22 to 5.98), but both resulted in similar casts to PVC, MOV and NR techniques, which were similar to each other (P>0.05). Conclusion SS technique showed the closest absolute values to baseline.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100425Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.06419info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMESSIAS,Aion ManginoSILVA,Stephania Caroline RodolfoABI-RACHED,Filipe de OliveiraSOUZA,Raphael FreitasREIS,José Maurício dos Santos Nuneseng2019-09-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772019000100425Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2019-09-19T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
title |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
spellingShingle |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made MESSIAS,Aion Mangino Dental impression materials silicone elastomers dental impression technique measurements, methods and theories |
title_short |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
title_full |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
title_fullStr |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
title_sort |
Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made |
author |
MESSIAS,Aion Mangino |
author_facet |
MESSIAS,Aion Mangino SILVA,Stephania Caroline Rodolfo ABI-RACHED,Filipe de Oliveira SOUZA,Raphael Freitas REIS,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SILVA,Stephania Caroline Rodolfo ABI-RACHED,Filipe de Oliveira SOUZA,Raphael Freitas REIS,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MESSIAS,Aion Mangino SILVA,Stephania Caroline Rodolfo ABI-RACHED,Filipe de Oliveira SOUZA,Raphael Freitas REIS,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental impression materials silicone elastomers dental impression technique measurements, methods and theories |
topic |
Dental impression materials silicone elastomers dental impression technique measurements, methods and theories |
description |
Abstract Introduction Making accurate and dimensionally stable impressions to duplicate oral conditions and tooth morphology is an essential step of prosthetic dentistry for fabricating well-fitted indirect restorations and, consequently, ensure the longevity and success of the treatment. Several authors describe pros and cons of different impression techniques, although there is no unanimity among them about the best one. Objective This study evaluated casts’ accuracy made by different impression techniques, trays and materials. Material and method 10 patients were selected and 20 impressions from teeth #13 to #16 were performed using single-step (SS) and two-step techniques, made with metal stock and customized acrylic resin partial trays, vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone rubbers. Type IV gypsum was used to pour the casts. Three photographs of each patient (baseline), as their respective gypsum casts, were taken, measured in their interested buccal surface area. Comparisons of area values among experimental groups and baseline were performed. Data showed adherence to normal curve, being submitted to 3-way ANOVA/Bonferroni test (α=.05). Result Technique produced significant differences (P=0.02). SS technique was more accurate than BUR one (P=0.003; 95=1.22 to 5.98), but both resulted in similar casts to PVC, MOV and NR techniques, which were similar to each other (P>0.05). Conclusion SS technique showed the closest absolute values to baseline. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100425 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772019000100425 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-2577.06419 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.48 2019 reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
collection |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||adriana@foar.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1748958560884097024 |