Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fair, Hernán
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3838
Resumo: This article analyzes how the ontological and ontic planes are interconnected in Laclau’s political discourse theory. It is concluded that, on the ontological level, hegemony constitutes a political-discursive form of relative, precarious, contingent and partial universalization and articulation of particularities in empty signifiers that act as nodal points. On the phenomenological-political level, Laclau shows the displacement and discursive contamination between the particular and the universal in the hegemonic operation which transforms political identities and builds a communitarian order and a new commonality. On the ethical-political level, the conceptualization of hegemony is articulated as the discursive construction of a socialist strategy and a radical democracy. This political project fights against essentialisms and forms of exploitation and social oppression of subordinate groups, and in favor of a horizon of liberation that recognizes conflicts and differences as constitutive and desirable. The formal theory of populism presents some ontic-ontological inconsistencies in this scheme. However, its symbolic overdetermination dissolves the disjunctions between logic and historical-political analysis and between form and content. This reveals the mutual interconnection between the ontic and the ontological, and the central relevance of the Gramscian notion of hegemony for the political and critical analysis of contemporary historical phenomena and processes. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017
id UNESP-19_dd96e653b3230df6940c3bc6561893f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3838
network_acronym_str UNESP-19
network_name_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
spelling Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto LaclauLa hegemonia en su mutuo anudamiento óntico-ontológico en la teoria política de Ernesto LaclauThis article analyzes how the ontological and ontic planes are interconnected in Laclau’s political discourse theory. It is concluded that, on the ontological level, hegemony constitutes a political-discursive form of relative, precarious, contingent and partial universalization and articulation of particularities in empty signifiers that act as nodal points. On the phenomenological-political level, Laclau shows the displacement and discursive contamination between the particular and the universal in the hegemonic operation which transforms political identities and builds a communitarian order and a new commonality. On the ethical-political level, the conceptualization of hegemony is articulated as the discursive construction of a socialist strategy and a radical democracy. This political project fights against essentialisms and forms of exploitation and social oppression of subordinate groups, and in favor of a horizon of liberation that recognizes conflicts and differences as constitutive and desirable. The formal theory of populism presents some ontic-ontological inconsistencies in this scheme. However, its symbolic overdetermination dissolves the disjunctions between logic and historical-political analysis and between form and content. This reveals the mutual interconnection between the ontic and the ontological, and the central relevance of the Gramscian notion of hegemony for the political and critical analysis of contemporary historical phenomena and processes. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017Este artículo analiza cómo se encadenan los planos de lo ontológico y lo óntico en la Teoría Política del Discurso de Ernesto Laclau. Se concluye que, desde el plano ontológico, la hegemonía constituye una forma político-discursiva de articulación y universalización relativa, precaria, contingente y parcial de los particularismos en significantes vacíos que actúan como puntos nodales. Desde el nivel fenoménico-político, Laclau pone en juego estos conceptos para mostrar el desplazamiento y contaminación discursiva entre lo particular y lo universal en la operación hegemónica, que transforma las identidades políticas y construye un orden comunitario y un nuevo sentido común. Desde el nivel ético-político, la conceptualización de la hegemonía se articula a la construcción discursiva de una estrategia socialista y a una democracia radical. Este proyecto político lucha contra los esencialismos y las formas de explotación y opresión social y por un horizonte de liberación que amalgame las luchas de los grupos subordinados y reconozca las diferencias y particularidades como constitutivas y deseables. La teoría formal del populismo presenta algunas inconsistencias óntico-ontológicas en este esquema. Sin embargo, su sobredeterminación simbólica disuelve las disyunciones tajantes entre la lógica y el análisis histórico-político y entre la forma y el contenido. Ello pone de manifiesto el mutuo anudamiento entre lo óntico y lo ontológico y la centralidad de la noción gramsciana de hegemonía para el análisis político y crítico de fenómenos y procesos históricos contemporáneos. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de FilosofiaTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia2019-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/383810.1590/0101-3173.2019.v42n2.09.p165TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 42 No 2 (2019); 165-194TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 2 (2019); 165-1940101-31730101-3173reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3838/5226Fair, Hernáninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-04T10:42:38Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3838Revistahttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/oai1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:null2020-08-04 10:42:39.496Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
La hegemonia en su mutuo anudamiento óntico-ontológico en la teoria política de Ernesto Laclau
title Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
spellingShingle Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
Fair, Hernán
title_short Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
title_full Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
title_fullStr Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
title_full_unstemmed Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
title_sort Hegemony in its ontic-ontological interconnection in the political theory of Ernesto Laclau
author Fair, Hernán
author_facet Fair, Hernán
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fair, Hernán
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article analyzes how the ontological and ontic planes are interconnected in Laclau’s political discourse theory. It is concluded that, on the ontological level, hegemony constitutes a political-discursive form of relative, precarious, contingent and partial universalization and articulation of particularities in empty signifiers that act as nodal points. On the phenomenological-political level, Laclau shows the displacement and discursive contamination between the particular and the universal in the hegemonic operation which transforms political identities and builds a communitarian order and a new commonality. On the ethical-political level, the conceptualization of hegemony is articulated as the discursive construction of a socialist strategy and a radical democracy. This political project fights against essentialisms and forms of exploitation and social oppression of subordinate groups, and in favor of a horizon of liberation that recognizes conflicts and differences as constitutive and desirable. The formal theory of populism presents some ontic-ontological inconsistencies in this scheme. However, its symbolic overdetermination dissolves the disjunctions between logic and historical-political analysis and between form and content. This reveals the mutual interconnection between the ontic and the ontological, and the central relevance of the Gramscian notion of hegemony for the political and critical analysis of contemporary historical phenomena and processes. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017
Este artículo analiza cómo se encadenan los planos de lo ontológico y lo óntico en la Teoría Política del Discurso de Ernesto Laclau. Se concluye que, desde el plano ontológico, la hegemonía constituye una forma político-discursiva de articulación y universalización relativa, precaria, contingente y parcial de los particularismos en significantes vacíos que actúan como puntos nodales. Desde el nivel fenoménico-político, Laclau pone en juego estos conceptos para mostrar el desplazamiento y contaminación discursiva entre lo particular y lo universal en la operación hegemónica, que transforma las identidades políticas y construye un orden comunitario y un nuevo sentido común. Desde el nivel ético-político, la conceptualización de la hegemonía se articula a la construcción discursiva de una estrategia socialista y a una democracia radical. Este proyecto político lucha contra los esencialismos y las formas de explotación y opresión social y por un horizonte de liberación que amalgame las luchas de los grupos subordinados y reconozca las diferencias y particularidades como constitutivas y deseables. La teoría formal del populismo presenta algunas inconsistencias óntico-ontológicas en este esquema. Sin embargo, su sobredeterminación simbólica disuelve las disyunciones tajantes entre la lógica y el análisis histórico-político y entre la forma y el contenido. Ello pone de manifiesto el mutuo anudamiento entre lo óntico y lo ontológico y la centralidad de la noción gramsciana de hegemonía para el análisis político y crítico de fenómenos y procesos históricos contemporáneos. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017
description This article analyzes how the ontological and ontic planes are interconnected in Laclau’s political discourse theory. It is concluded that, on the ontological level, hegemony constitutes a political-discursive form of relative, precarious, contingent and partial universalization and articulation of particularities in empty signifiers that act as nodal points. On the phenomenological-political level, Laclau shows the displacement and discursive contamination between the particular and the universal in the hegemonic operation which transforms political identities and builds a communitarian order and a new commonality. On the ethical-political level, the conceptualization of hegemony is articulated as the discursive construction of a socialist strategy and a radical democracy. This political project fights against essentialisms and forms of exploitation and social oppression of subordinate groups, and in favor of a horizon of liberation that recognizes conflicts and differences as constitutive and desirable. The formal theory of populism presents some ontic-ontological inconsistencies in this scheme. However, its symbolic overdetermination dissolves the disjunctions between logic and historical-political analysis and between form and content. This reveals the mutual interconnection between the ontic and the ontological, and the central relevance of the Gramscian notion of hegemony for the political and critical analysis of contemporary historical phenomena and processes. Recebido: 10/02/2015Aceito: 23/08/2017
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3838
10.1590/0101-3173.2019.v42n2.09.p165
url http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3838
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0101-3173.2019.v42n2.09.p165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3838/5226
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 42 No 2 (2019); 165-194
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 2 (2019); 165-194
0101-3173
0101-3173
reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
collection Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1674119823746924544