Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Archangelo, Karen Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sato, Tabata Prado, Penteado, Marcela Moreira, Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz, Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto, Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing.
id UNESP-20_16015917dbe9cb3eefbebd83f0e5476e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1533
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysisObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/153310.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-952178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/1233https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3244https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3245Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArchangelo, Karen CristinaSato, Tabata PradoPenteado, Marcela MoreiraContreras, Edwin Fernando RuizBorges, Alexandre Luiz SoutoCorrêa, Giovani de Oliveira2020-01-28T12:10:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1533Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:15.861516Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
title Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
spellingShingle Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
Archangelo, Karen Cristina
title_short Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
title_full Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
title_fullStr Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
title_sort Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
author Archangelo, Karen Cristina
author_facet Archangelo, Karen Cristina
Sato, Tabata Prado
Penteado, Marcela Moreira
Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Sato, Tabata Prado
Penteado, Marcela Moreira
Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Archangelo, Karen Cristina
Sato, Tabata Prado
Penteado, Marcela Moreira
Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira
description Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533
10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/1233
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3244
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3245
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346900273954816