Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing. |
id |
UNESP-20_16015917dbe9cb3eefbebd83f0e5476e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1533 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysisObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/153310.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-952178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/1233https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3244https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3245Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArchangelo, Karen CristinaSato, Tabata PradoPenteado, Marcela MoreiraContreras, Edwin Fernando RuizBorges, Alexandre Luiz SoutoCorrêa, Giovani de Oliveira2020-01-28T12:10:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1533Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:15.861516Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
title |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis Archangelo, Karen Cristina |
title_short |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
title_full |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
title_sort |
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: morphological analysis |
author |
Archangelo, Karen Cristina |
author_facet |
Archangelo, Karen Cristina Sato, Tabata Prado Penteado, Marcela Moreira Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sato, Tabata Prado Penteado, Marcela Moreira Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Archangelo, Karen Cristina Sato, Tabata Prado Penteado, Marcela Moreira Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Corrêa, Giovani de Oliveira |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ± 0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Keywords: Ceramics; Dental porcelain; Dental polishing. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533 10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/1233 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3244 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1533/3245 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Jan. - Mar. / 2018 - Published March 2018; 88-95 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346900273954816 |