Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paes-Junior, Tarcisio
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Costa, Anna Karina Figueiredo, Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto, Cunha, Lucas Daniel da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of the anatomic models of edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches.  Material and Methods: Alginate molds of the edentulous arches of standard model were performed and the tray was placed to the special device. These models received three metal spheres on surface with two positioned on the crest of the alveolar ridge (spheres 1 and 2) and other one perpendicular to the intersection of the midpalatal suture (sphere 3) and impression was performed using alginate. The proportion powder/liquid was measured according manufacturer for both arches. To double molding technique with alginate was necessary to uniformly relieve using an acetate film. After that, were performed the first impression and the second layer of alginate with conventional water-powder-proportion and also the second layer of alginate with altered water-powder-proportion. The distances of each spheres were obtained using a three-dimensional measuring-machine, and the data were analyzed by Dunnet, ANOVA and Tukey tests with a significant level of 5%. Results: A comparison of the water-powder-proportion showed significant differences in the maxillary archer with sphere distance between 3-2 (p < 0.0001) and 1-3 (p < 0.0001). The mandibular archer showed significant differences when relief between distance 1-2 (p<0.041).  The Dunnet test showed different in 1-2 mandibular groups (p < 0.0450). Conclusion: The reline alginate techniques showed differences in results in comparison to the conventional technique, however, the proportion water/powder technique modified, decreasing the viscosity, showed satisfactory results, the relief variable showed no difference statistically significantly and the techniques proposed could be employed in clinical practice.KeywordsAlginate; Complete denture; Edentulism.
id UNESP-20_3313c532ad958791fb49cba2de7ba47e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1429
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patientsObjective: The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of the anatomic models of edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches.  Material and Methods: Alginate molds of the edentulous arches of standard model were performed and the tray was placed to the special device. These models received three metal spheres on surface with two positioned on the crest of the alveolar ridge (spheres 1 and 2) and other one perpendicular to the intersection of the midpalatal suture (sphere 3) and impression was performed using alginate. The proportion powder/liquid was measured according manufacturer for both arches. To double molding technique with alginate was necessary to uniformly relieve using an acetate film. After that, were performed the first impression and the second layer of alginate with conventional water-powder-proportion and also the second layer of alginate with altered water-powder-proportion. The distances of each spheres were obtained using a three-dimensional measuring-machine, and the data were analyzed by Dunnet, ANOVA and Tukey tests with a significant level of 5%. Results: A comparison of the water-powder-proportion showed significant differences in the maxillary archer with sphere distance between 3-2 (p < 0.0001) and 1-3 (p < 0.0001). The mandibular archer showed significant differences when relief between distance 1-2 (p<0.041).  The Dunnet test showed different in 1-2 mandibular groups (p < 0.0450). Conclusion: The reline alginate techniques showed differences in results in comparison to the conventional technique, however, the proportion water/powder technique modified, decreasing the viscosity, showed satisfactory results, the relief variable showed no difference statistically significantly and the techniques proposed could be employed in clinical practice.KeywordsAlginate; Complete denture; Edentulism.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2017-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/142910.14295/bds.2017.v20i2.1429Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017): Apr. - Jun. / 2017 - Published Jun 2017; 114-121Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 2 (2017): Apr. - Jun. / 2017 - Published Jun 2017; 114-1212178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/1158https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2977https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2978https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2979https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2980https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2981https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2982https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2983https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2984Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaes-Junior, TarcisioCosta, Anna Karina FigueiredoBorges, Alexandre Luiz SoutoCunha, Lucas Daniel da2020-01-28T12:14:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1429Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:12.654169Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
title Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
spellingShingle Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
Paes-Junior, Tarcisio
title_short Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
title_full Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
title_fullStr Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
title_full_unstemmed Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
title_sort Alternative technique for preliminary impression in edentulous patients
author Paes-Junior, Tarcisio
author_facet Paes-Junior, Tarcisio
Costa, Anna Karina Figueiredo
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Cunha, Lucas Daniel da
author_role author
author2 Costa, Anna Karina Figueiredo
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Cunha, Lucas Daniel da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paes-Junior, Tarcisio
Costa, Anna Karina Figueiredo
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
Cunha, Lucas Daniel da
description Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of the anatomic models of edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches.  Material and Methods: Alginate molds of the edentulous arches of standard model were performed and the tray was placed to the special device. These models received three metal spheres on surface with two positioned on the crest of the alveolar ridge (spheres 1 and 2) and other one perpendicular to the intersection of the midpalatal suture (sphere 3) and impression was performed using alginate. The proportion powder/liquid was measured according manufacturer for both arches. To double molding technique with alginate was necessary to uniformly relieve using an acetate film. After that, were performed the first impression and the second layer of alginate with conventional water-powder-proportion and also the second layer of alginate with altered water-powder-proportion. The distances of each spheres were obtained using a three-dimensional measuring-machine, and the data were analyzed by Dunnet, ANOVA and Tukey tests with a significant level of 5%. Results: A comparison of the water-powder-proportion showed significant differences in the maxillary archer with sphere distance between 3-2 (p < 0.0001) and 1-3 (p < 0.0001). The mandibular archer showed significant differences when relief between distance 1-2 (p<0.041).  The Dunnet test showed different in 1-2 mandibular groups (p < 0.0450). Conclusion: The reline alginate techniques showed differences in results in comparison to the conventional technique, however, the proportion water/powder technique modified, decreasing the viscosity, showed satisfactory results, the relief variable showed no difference statistically significantly and the techniques proposed could be employed in clinical practice.KeywordsAlginate; Complete denture; Edentulism.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429
10.14295/bds.2017.v20i2.1429
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2017.v20i2.1429
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/1158
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2977
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2978
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2979
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2980
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2981
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2982
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2983
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1429/2984
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017): Apr. - Jun. / 2017 - Published Jun 2017; 114-121
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 2 (2017): Apr. - Jun. / 2017 - Published Jun 2017; 114-121
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346899869204480