Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3472 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To compare accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone. Material and Methods: The patients were selected according to the eligibility criterias. The selected patients were randomly allocated to either digital light processing stents (test group) or selective laser sintered computer guided stents (control group). Proper examination and diagnostic records were done for each patient followed by triple scan protocol with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Planning and construction of tooth supported computer guided surgical stent was done by either digital light processing technique for test group or selective laser sintering for control group. Twenty implants were inserted following computer guided implant placement protocol. After post-operative CBCT pre and post images were merged using blue sky bio software. Linear and angular deviations between planned implant and actual implant positions were measured. Results: Tests were considered statistically significant if the p- value was less than 0.05. Difference in means were calculated for the analysis of continuous variables with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. There was no statistical difference between selective laser sintering and digital light processing groups in all measured terms. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, both techniques can be used for immediate implant placement with clinically satisfactory results decreasing the positional errors associated with immediate implant placement. KEYWORDS Computer aided; Immediate dental implant; Stents; Surgery; Guided surgery. |
id |
UNESP-20_7adf78cb14f174e4e37818a40049dc94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3472 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trialABSTRACT Objective: To compare accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone. Material and Methods: The patients were selected according to the eligibility criterias. The selected patients were randomly allocated to either digital light processing stents (test group) or selective laser sintered computer guided stents (control group). Proper examination and diagnostic records were done for each patient followed by triple scan protocol with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Planning and construction of tooth supported computer guided surgical stent was done by either digital light processing technique for test group or selective laser sintering for control group. Twenty implants were inserted following computer guided implant placement protocol. After post-operative CBCT pre and post images were merged using blue sky bio software. Linear and angular deviations between planned implant and actual implant positions were measured. Results: Tests were considered statistically significant if the p- value was less than 0.05. Difference in means were calculated for the analysis of continuous variables with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. There was no statistical difference between selective laser sintering and digital light processing groups in all measured terms. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, both techniques can be used for immediate implant placement with clinically satisfactory results decreasing the positional errors associated with immediate implant placement. KEYWORDS Computer aided; Immediate dental implant; Stents; Surgery; Guided surgery.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2023-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/347210.4322/bds.2023.e3472Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023): Apr - Jun / 2023 - Published Mar 2023Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Apr - Jun / 2023 - Published Mar 20232178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3472/4615Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHamdi, MahetabEl Khadem, Amr HosnyAmer, Ashraf Moneam2023-06-13T17:03:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3472Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2023-06-13T17:03:30Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
title |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial Hamdi, Mahetab |
title_short |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
Accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial |
author |
Hamdi, Mahetab |
author_facet |
Hamdi, Mahetab El Khadem, Amr Hosny Amer, Ashraf Moneam |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
El Khadem, Amr Hosny Amer, Ashraf Moneam |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hamdi, Mahetab El Khadem, Amr Hosny Amer, Ashraf Moneam |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare accuracy of selective laser sintered computer guided stents versus digital light processing stents in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone. Material and Methods: The patients were selected according to the eligibility criterias. The selected patients were randomly allocated to either digital light processing stents (test group) or selective laser sintered computer guided stents (control group). Proper examination and diagnostic records were done for each patient followed by triple scan protocol with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Planning and construction of tooth supported computer guided surgical stent was done by either digital light processing technique for test group or selective laser sintering for control group. Twenty implants were inserted following computer guided implant placement protocol. After post-operative CBCT pre and post images were merged using blue sky bio software. Linear and angular deviations between planned implant and actual implant positions were measured. Results: Tests were considered statistically significant if the p- value was less than 0.05. Difference in means were calculated for the analysis of continuous variables with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. There was no statistical difference between selective laser sintering and digital light processing groups in all measured terms. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, both techniques can be used for immediate implant placement with clinically satisfactory results decreasing the positional errors associated with immediate implant placement. KEYWORDS Computer aided; Immediate dental implant; Stents; Surgery; Guided surgery. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3472 10.4322/bds.2023.e3472 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3472 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4322/bds.2023.e3472 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3472/4615 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023): Apr - Jun / 2023 - Published Mar 2023 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Apr - Jun / 2023 - Published Mar 2023 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214394612744192 |