Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nouh, Ingy
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Rafla, Nancy, Ebeid , Kamal Khaled
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706
Resumo: Objective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics.
id UNESP-20_8f7dcc0218f62507704890e9d9a5d9aa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3706
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro studyObjective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2023-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/370610.4322/bds.2023.e3706Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 20232178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706/4601Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNouh, IngyRafla, NancyEbeid , Kamal Khaled2023-01-03T13:49:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3706Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2023-01-03T13:49:04Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
title Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
spellingShingle Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
Nouh, Ingy
title_short Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
title_full Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
title_fullStr Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
title_sort Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
author Nouh, Ingy
author_facet Nouh, Ingy
Rafla, Nancy
Ebeid , Kamal Khaled
author_role author
author2 Rafla, Nancy
Ebeid , Kamal Khaled
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nouh, Ingy
Rafla, Nancy
Ebeid , Kamal Khaled
description Objective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706
10.4322/bds.2023.e3706
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706
identifier_str_mv 10.4322/bds.2023.e3706
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706/4601
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1800214394665172992