Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706 |
Resumo: | Objective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics. |
id |
UNESP-20_8f7dcc0218f62507704890e9d9a5d9aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3706 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro studyObjective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2023-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/370610.4322/bds.2023.e3706Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 20232178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706/4601Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNouh, IngyRafla, NancyEbeid , Kamal Khaled2023-01-03T13:49:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3706Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2023-01-03T13:49:04Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
title |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
spellingShingle |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study Nouh, Ingy |
title_short |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
title_full |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
title_sort |
Mechanical behavior of different machinable ceramic crowns using vertical and horizontal preparations: an in-vitro study |
author |
Nouh, Ingy |
author_facet |
Nouh, Ingy Rafla, Nancy Ebeid , Kamal Khaled |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rafla, Nancy Ebeid , Kamal Khaled |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nouh, Ingy Rafla, Nancy Ebeid , Kamal Khaled |
description |
Objective: the aim of this study was to compare the mechanical behavior of different ceramics when used in thinvertical preparations versus traditional horizontal preparation. Material and Methods: two stainless-steel dieswere milled to simulate a minimally invasive vertical preparation (VP) and a traditional horizontal preparation(HP) for an all-ceramic crown of a maxillary first premolar. The stainless-steel dies were duplicated using epoxyresin. Eighty monolithic crowns were milled and divided into 2 groups according to preparation design. Eachdesign group was subdivided into 4 sub-groups according to material (n=10): IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate),Bruxzir shaded zirconia (full contour zirconia), CeraSmart (resin nanoceramic) and CEREC Tessera (advancedlithium disilicate). The crowns were cemented on their relevant epoxy resin dies using self-adhesive resin cement.All specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermocycles and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey pair wise comparison test. Results: the fracture resistancemean values of the VP (1344 + 118 N) was significantly lower than the HP design (1646 + 191 N). Ceramiccrowns made of full contour zirconia had higher fracture resistance mean values (2842 + 380 N) than advancedlithium disilicate (1272 + 125 N) followed by lithium disilicate crowns (983 + 52 N) and resin nanoceramic(882 + 61 N). Conclusion: both vertical and horizontal preparations, regardless the different ceramic materials,showed clinically acceptable fracture resistance values. KEYWORDSDental crown; Prosthodontics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramics. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706 10.4322/bds.2023.e3706 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4322/bds.2023.e3706 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/3706/4601 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 26 n. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar / 2023 - Published Jan 2023 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214394665172992 |