Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem Mohammed
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Khalifa, Nadia, Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1710
Resumo: Objective: Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors present challenges to dentists in terms of treatment planning and can negatively affect aesthetics and function in patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the preferred treatment approach of dentists with different specialties. Material and Methods: We carried out a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a questionnaire that was self-administered to 12 specialists in removable prosthodontics, 18 specialists in restorative dentistry, 14 specialists in orthodontics, and 173 registered general dentists.  Results: General practitioners (72.7%), prosthodontists (92.9%) and, restorative dentists (80%) preferred prosthodontic replacement of missing maxillary lateral incisors, while orthodontists (57.1%) preferred canine substitution. Most general practitioners (62.7%), prosthodontists (71.4%), and orthodontists (92.9%), as well as many restorative specialists (40%), preferred implant-retained crowns for prosthetic replacement of missing lateral incisors. The dental specialties differed significantly in terms of their preferred modalities for treating children over the age of 12 years. General practitioners (56%) preferred removable partial dentures (RPDs), while a mere 17.2% preferred to carry out no treatment. All prosthodontists (100%) preferred treatment with RPDs. Restorative dentists preferred RPDs and adhesive bridges in equal number (33.3% in each case). Fifty percent of orthodontists treating children with missing lateral incisors preferred RPDs, followed by (28.6%) who preferred canine substitution. Conclusion: Preference varied for several reasons among dentists’ treating both adults and children over 12 years of age. KeywordsMaxillary missing teeth; Dentist's preference; Teeth replacement; Dental implant.
id UNESP-20_b35eb28d5c5213c3f91a5fd839c7cf84
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1710
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral IncisorsObjective: Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors present challenges to dentists in terms of treatment planning and can negatively affect aesthetics and function in patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the preferred treatment approach of dentists with different specialties. Material and Methods: We carried out a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a questionnaire that was self-administered to 12 specialists in removable prosthodontics, 18 specialists in restorative dentistry, 14 specialists in orthodontics, and 173 registered general dentists.  Results: General practitioners (72.7%), prosthodontists (92.9%) and, restorative dentists (80%) preferred prosthodontic replacement of missing maxillary lateral incisors, while orthodontists (57.1%) preferred canine substitution. Most general practitioners (62.7%), prosthodontists (71.4%), and orthodontists (92.9%), as well as many restorative specialists (40%), preferred implant-retained crowns for prosthetic replacement of missing lateral incisors. The dental specialties differed significantly in terms of their preferred modalities for treating children over the age of 12 years. General practitioners (56%) preferred removable partial dentures (RPDs), while a mere 17.2% preferred to carry out no treatment. All prosthodontists (100%) preferred treatment with RPDs. Restorative dentists preferred RPDs and adhesive bridges in equal number (33.3% in each case). Fifty percent of orthodontists treating children with missing lateral incisors preferred RPDs, followed by (28.6%) who preferred canine substitution. Conclusion: Preference varied for several reasons among dentists’ treating both adults and children over 12 years of age. KeywordsMaxillary missing teeth; Dentist's preference; Teeth replacement; Dental implant.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2019-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/171010.14295/bds.2019.v22i2.1710Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019): Apr. - Jun. / 2019 - Published April 2019; 243-251Brazilian Dental Science; v. 22 n. 2 (2019): Apr. - Jun. / 2019 - Published April 2019; 243-2512178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1710/1355Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem MohammedKhalifa, NadiaAlhajj, Mohammed Nasser2020-01-28T11:57:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1710Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:21.156075Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
title Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
spellingShingle Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
Abdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem Mohammed
title_short Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
title_full Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
title_fullStr Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
title_full_unstemmed Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
title_sort Dentists’ Preferences in the Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
author Abdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem Mohammed
author_facet Abdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem Mohammed
Khalifa, Nadia
Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser
author_role author
author2 Khalifa, Nadia
Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdulrahman, Nuha Abdulazeem Mohammed
Khalifa, Nadia
Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser
description Objective: Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors present challenges to dentists in terms of treatment planning and can negatively affect aesthetics and function in patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the preferred treatment approach of dentists with different specialties. Material and Methods: We carried out a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a questionnaire that was self-administered to 12 specialists in removable prosthodontics, 18 specialists in restorative dentistry, 14 specialists in orthodontics, and 173 registered general dentists.  Results: General practitioners (72.7%), prosthodontists (92.9%) and, restorative dentists (80%) preferred prosthodontic replacement of missing maxillary lateral incisors, while orthodontists (57.1%) preferred canine substitution. Most general practitioners (62.7%), prosthodontists (71.4%), and orthodontists (92.9%), as well as many restorative specialists (40%), preferred implant-retained crowns for prosthetic replacement of missing lateral incisors. The dental specialties differed significantly in terms of their preferred modalities for treating children over the age of 12 years. General practitioners (56%) preferred removable partial dentures (RPDs), while a mere 17.2% preferred to carry out no treatment. All prosthodontists (100%) preferred treatment with RPDs. Restorative dentists preferred RPDs and adhesive bridges in equal number (33.3% in each case). Fifty percent of orthodontists treating children with missing lateral incisors preferred RPDs, followed by (28.6%) who preferred canine substitution. Conclusion: Preference varied for several reasons among dentists’ treating both adults and children over 12 years of age. KeywordsMaxillary missing teeth; Dentist's preference; Teeth replacement; Dental implant.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1710
10.14295/bds.2019.v22i2.1710
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1710
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2019.v22i2.1710
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1710/1355
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019): Apr. - Jun. / 2019 - Published April 2019; 243-251
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 22 n. 2 (2019): Apr. - Jun. / 2019 - Published April 2019; 243-251
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346900790902784