Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375 |
Resumo: | Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on bond strength of repairs on aged composite resin. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty microhybrid composite units (Filtek Z250) aged in distilled at 37ºC water for six months were submitted to different surface treatment prior to resin repairs. Ten specimens were randomly divided into 12 groups: non-treated/no bonding agent (negative control), sandblasting /no bonding agent, silane/no bonding agent, non-treated/ etch-and-rinse; non-treated/one-step self-etch; non-treated/ two-step self-etch; sandblasting/etch-and-rinse; sandblasting/one-step self-etch; sandblasting/two-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/etch-and-rinse; silane coupling agent/ one-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/two-step self-etch. Microshear testing was performed to bond strength assessment. Results: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (?=0.05) demonstrated significant difference between the surface treatments and adhesive systems. Only no treated surface/etch-and-rinse group showed lower bond strength values when compared to other groups. Conclusion: The considered surface treatments were capable to increase the effectiveness of the repair in composite resin when using the adhesive etch-and-rinse. |
id |
UNESP-20_c863c0831ffb8d96e0169f15a7394efe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1375 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol?Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on bond strength of repairs on aged composite resin. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty microhybrid composite units (Filtek Z250) aged in distilled at 37ºC water for six months were submitted to different surface treatment prior to resin repairs. Ten specimens were randomly divided into 12 groups: non-treated/no bonding agent (negative control), sandblasting /no bonding agent, silane/no bonding agent, non-treated/ etch-and-rinse; non-treated/one-step self-etch; non-treated/ two-step self-etch; sandblasting/etch-and-rinse; sandblasting/one-step self-etch; sandblasting/two-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/etch-and-rinse; silane coupling agent/ one-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/two-step self-etch. Microshear testing was performed to bond strength assessment. Results: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (?=0.05) demonstrated significant difference between the surface treatments and adhesive systems. Only no treated surface/etch-and-rinse group showed lower bond strength values when compared to other groups. Conclusion: The considered surface treatments were capable to increase the effectiveness of the repair in composite resin when using the adhesive etch-and-rinse.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2017-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpeghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/137510.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1375Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 99-109Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 99-1092178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/1107https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2918https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2919https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2920Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Alessandra PereiraShimaoka, Angela MayumiCarvalho, Rubens Corte Real de2020-01-28T12:15:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1375Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:11.271443Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
title |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
spellingShingle |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? Andrade, Alessandra Pereira |
title_short |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
title_full |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
title_fullStr |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
title_sort |
Composite resin repairs: What is the most effective protocol? |
author |
Andrade, Alessandra Pereira |
author_facet |
Andrade, Alessandra Pereira Shimaoka, Angela Mayumi Carvalho, Rubens Corte Real de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shimaoka, Angela Mayumi Carvalho, Rubens Corte Real de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Alessandra Pereira Shimaoka, Angela Mayumi Carvalho, Rubens Corte Real de |
description |
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on bond strength of repairs on aged composite resin. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty microhybrid composite units (Filtek Z250) aged in distilled at 37ºC water for six months were submitted to different surface treatment prior to resin repairs. Ten specimens were randomly divided into 12 groups: non-treated/no bonding agent (negative control), sandblasting /no bonding agent, silane/no bonding agent, non-treated/ etch-and-rinse; non-treated/one-step self-etch; non-treated/ two-step self-etch; sandblasting/etch-and-rinse; sandblasting/one-step self-etch; sandblasting/two-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/etch-and-rinse; silane coupling agent/ one-step self-etch; silane coupling agent/two-step self-etch. Microshear testing was performed to bond strength assessment. Results: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (?=0.05) demonstrated significant difference between the surface treatments and adhesive systems. Only no treated surface/etch-and-rinse group showed lower bond strength values when compared to other groups. Conclusion: The considered surface treatments were capable to increase the effectiveness of the repair in composite resin when using the adhesive etch-and-rinse. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375 10.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1375 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1375 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/1107 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2918 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2919 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1375/2920 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 99-109 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 99-109 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346899832504320 |