Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ElGendy, Menna Ahmed
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mosleh, Ihab, Zaghloul, Hanaa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830
Resumo: Objective: the purpose of the study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different cements to translucent zirconia before and after thermocycling aging. Material and methods: Twelve translucent zirconia ceramic discs were used in the study. Specimens were sandblasted using 50 ??m aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 4) according to the cement type: Panavia resin cement (control group), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and Activa bioactive cement. Each group was further sub-divided into two equal subgroups (n = 2) according to whether the specimens were subjected to thermocycling or not. Thermocycling was performed in distilled water at 5000 cycles between 5 oC - 55 oC. The micro-shear bond strength test (?SBS) was measured using universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare between the three cements. Dunn’s test was used for pair-wise comparisons when Kruskal-Wallis test is significant. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between micro-shear bond strength before and after thermocycling P ? 0.05. Results: In non-aged subgroups, there was no significant difference between Panavia and Activa; both showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (22.9 MPa, 31.3 MPa respectively). While, RMGI showed the lowest ?SBS values (4.7 MPa).  In thermocycled subgroups, Panavia showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (32.2 MPa). There was no significant difference between RMGI and Activa; both showed the lowest significant mean ?SBS values (3.2 MPa and 8.7 MPa respectively). Conclusions: RMGI and Activa couldn’t be considered long-term reliable materials for cementing zirconia. However, Panavia provided the most durable bond to zirconia.KEYWORDSBioactive cement; Micro-shear bond strength; Resin cement; Translucent zirconia.
id UNESP-20_f0fc01212a793e49071e2f034539e896
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1830
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro studyObjective: the purpose of the study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different cements to translucent zirconia before and after thermocycling aging. Material and methods: Twelve translucent zirconia ceramic discs were used in the study. Specimens were sandblasted using 50 ??m aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 4) according to the cement type: Panavia resin cement (control group), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and Activa bioactive cement. Each group was further sub-divided into two equal subgroups (n = 2) according to whether the specimens were subjected to thermocycling or not. Thermocycling was performed in distilled water at 5000 cycles between 5 oC - 55 oC. The micro-shear bond strength test (?SBS) was measured using universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare between the three cements. Dunn’s test was used for pair-wise comparisons when Kruskal-Wallis test is significant. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between micro-shear bond strength before and after thermocycling P ? 0.05. Results: In non-aged subgroups, there was no significant difference between Panavia and Activa; both showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (22.9 MPa, 31.3 MPa respectively). While, RMGI showed the lowest ?SBS values (4.7 MPa).  In thermocycled subgroups, Panavia showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (32.2 MPa). There was no significant difference between RMGI and Activa; both showed the lowest significant mean ?SBS values (3.2 MPa and 8.7 MPa respectively). Conclusions: RMGI and Activa couldn’t be considered long-term reliable materials for cementing zirconia. However, Panavia provided the most durable bond to zirconia.KEYWORDSBioactive cement; Micro-shear bond strength; Resin cement; Translucent zirconia.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2020-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentimage/jpeghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/183010.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1830Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2020): Jan. - Mar. - Published Jan. 2020; 9 p.Brazilian Dental Science; v. 23 n. 1 (2020): Jan. - Mar. - Published Jan. 2020; 9 p.2178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/1434https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3843https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3844https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3845https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3846https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3847https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3848https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3849https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3850https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3851https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3857https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/4076Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessElGendy, Menna AhmedMosleh, IhabZaghloul, Hanaa2020-02-14T11:59:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1830Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:25.073372Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
title Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
spellingShingle Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
ElGendy, Menna Ahmed
title_short Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
title_full Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
title_fullStr Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
title_sort Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study
author ElGendy, Menna Ahmed
author_facet ElGendy, Menna Ahmed
Mosleh, Ihab
Zaghloul, Hanaa
author_role author
author2 Mosleh, Ihab
Zaghloul, Hanaa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ElGendy, Menna Ahmed
Mosleh, Ihab
Zaghloul, Hanaa
description Objective: the purpose of the study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of different cements to translucent zirconia before and after thermocycling aging. Material and methods: Twelve translucent zirconia ceramic discs were used in the study. Specimens were sandblasted using 50 ??m aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 4) according to the cement type: Panavia resin cement (control group), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and Activa bioactive cement. Each group was further sub-divided into two equal subgroups (n = 2) according to whether the specimens were subjected to thermocycling or not. Thermocycling was performed in distilled water at 5000 cycles between 5 oC - 55 oC. The micro-shear bond strength test (?SBS) was measured using universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare between the three cements. Dunn’s test was used for pair-wise comparisons when Kruskal-Wallis test is significant. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between micro-shear bond strength before and after thermocycling P ? 0.05. Results: In non-aged subgroups, there was no significant difference between Panavia and Activa; both showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (22.9 MPa, 31.3 MPa respectively). While, RMGI showed the lowest ?SBS values (4.7 MPa).  In thermocycled subgroups, Panavia showed significantly the highest mean ?SBS values (32.2 MPa). There was no significant difference between RMGI and Activa; both showed the lowest significant mean ?SBS values (3.2 MPa and 8.7 MPa respectively). Conclusions: RMGI and Activa couldn’t be considered long-term reliable materials for cementing zirconia. However, Panavia provided the most durable bond to zirconia.KEYWORDSBioactive cement; Micro-shear bond strength; Resin cement; Translucent zirconia.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830
10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1830
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1830
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/1434
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3843
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3844
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3845
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3846
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3847
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3848
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3849
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3850
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3851
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/3857
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1830/4076
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2020): Jan. - Mar. - Published Jan. 2020; 9 p.
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 23 n. 1 (2020): Jan. - Mar. - Published Jan. 2020; 9 p.
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346901168390144