Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Takami Narita, Taynara
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Alberconi, Caio Henrique, Souza, Fernando Bernardi de, Ikeziri, Lucas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas
Texto Completo: https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815
Resumo: Purpose: Evaluate and compare PERT/CPM and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) techniques, from the Theory of Constraints (TOC), in relation to indicators of delivery time estimation and reliability in meeting established deadlines.Theoretical framework: The research is based on the time management theory established by the PERT/CPM and CCPM methods.Design/methodology/approach: This work has an experimental character, using a method of computer simulation by applying the Promodel software. A fictitious project environment managed by PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques was modeled in order to evaluate and compare their performances in terms of estimation of, and compliance with, project completion deadlines.Findings: The results obtained showed that the CCPM method proved to be more effective in reducing project completion time and meeting established deadlines. Conversely, the PERT/CPM method increased planned project completion time by 189%.Research, Practical & Social implications: Many managers assume that the best approach to project planning, especially when aiming for short and reliable deadlines, is to allocate margins of safety to each scheduled activity. This research reinforced the already widely held perception of TOC that, due to certain ordinary human behaviors, local optimizations do not guarantee, and usually adversely effect, good global results.Originality/value: There is a lack of research comparing PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques through modeling and computer simulations of project environments subjected to certain degrees of uncertainty, particularly in terms of performance variables such as those studied here. The results of this research, therefore, address this opportunity, bringing to light comparative scenarios and explanations for the different behaviors observed.Keywords: Computational Simulation; Project Management; Goldratt; Critical Chain; CCPM; PERT/CPM.
id UNESP-2_9cdef145b5d2bbf647f35e91fb2278e6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.gepros.emnuvens.com.br:article/2815
network_acronym_str UNESP-2
network_name_str GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time ManagementGerenciamento de ProjetosTeoria das RestriçõesSimulação ComputacionalCCPMPERT/CPMPurpose: Evaluate and compare PERT/CPM and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) techniques, from the Theory of Constraints (TOC), in relation to indicators of delivery time estimation and reliability in meeting established deadlines.Theoretical framework: The research is based on the time management theory established by the PERT/CPM and CCPM methods.Design/methodology/approach: This work has an experimental character, using a method of computer simulation by applying the Promodel software. A fictitious project environment managed by PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques was modeled in order to evaluate and compare their performances in terms of estimation of, and compliance with, project completion deadlines.Findings: The results obtained showed that the CCPM method proved to be more effective in reducing project completion time and meeting established deadlines. Conversely, the PERT/CPM method increased planned project completion time by 189%.Research, Practical & Social implications: Many managers assume that the best approach to project planning, especially when aiming for short and reliable deadlines, is to allocate margins of safety to each scheduled activity. This research reinforced the already widely held perception of TOC that, due to certain ordinary human behaviors, local optimizations do not guarantee, and usually adversely effect, good global results.Originality/value: There is a lack of research comparing PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques through modeling and computer simulations of project environments subjected to certain degrees of uncertainty, particularly in terms of performance variables such as those studied here. The results of this research, therefore, address this opportunity, bringing to light comparative scenarios and explanations for the different behaviors observed.Keywords: Computational Simulation; Project Management; Goldratt; Critical Chain; CCPM; PERT/CPM.A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB)2021-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/281510.15675/gepros.v16i3.2815Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas; v. 16 n. 3 (2021); 011984-2430reponame:GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemasinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815/pdfhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815/1955Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTakami Narita, TaynaraAlberconi, Caio HenriqueSouza, Fernando Bernardi deIkeziri, Lucas2023-11-22T15:25:26Zoai:ojs.gepros.emnuvens.com.br:article/2815Revistahttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/geprosPUBhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/oaigepros@feb.unesp.br||abjabbour@feb.unesp.br1984-24301809-614Xopendoar:2023-11-22T15:25:26GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
title Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
spellingShingle Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
Takami Narita, Taynara
Gerenciamento de Projetos
Teoria das Restrições
Simulação Computacional
CCPM
PERT/CPM
title_short Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
title_full Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
title_fullStr Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
title_sort Comparison of PERT/CPM and CCPM Methods in Project Time Management
author Takami Narita, Taynara
author_facet Takami Narita, Taynara
Alberconi, Caio Henrique
Souza, Fernando Bernardi de
Ikeziri, Lucas
author_role author
author2 Alberconi, Caio Henrique
Souza, Fernando Bernardi de
Ikeziri, Lucas
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Takami Narita, Taynara
Alberconi, Caio Henrique
Souza, Fernando Bernardi de
Ikeziri, Lucas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gerenciamento de Projetos
Teoria das Restrições
Simulação Computacional
CCPM
PERT/CPM
topic Gerenciamento de Projetos
Teoria das Restrições
Simulação Computacional
CCPM
PERT/CPM
description Purpose: Evaluate and compare PERT/CPM and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) techniques, from the Theory of Constraints (TOC), in relation to indicators of delivery time estimation and reliability in meeting established deadlines.Theoretical framework: The research is based on the time management theory established by the PERT/CPM and CCPM methods.Design/methodology/approach: This work has an experimental character, using a method of computer simulation by applying the Promodel software. A fictitious project environment managed by PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques was modeled in order to evaluate and compare their performances in terms of estimation of, and compliance with, project completion deadlines.Findings: The results obtained showed that the CCPM method proved to be more effective in reducing project completion time and meeting established deadlines. Conversely, the PERT/CPM method increased planned project completion time by 189%.Research, Practical & Social implications: Many managers assume that the best approach to project planning, especially when aiming for short and reliable deadlines, is to allocate margins of safety to each scheduled activity. This research reinforced the already widely held perception of TOC that, due to certain ordinary human behaviors, local optimizations do not guarantee, and usually adversely effect, good global results.Originality/value: There is a lack of research comparing PERT/CPM and CCPM techniques through modeling and computer simulations of project environments subjected to certain degrees of uncertainty, particularly in terms of performance variables such as those studied here. The results of this research, therefore, address this opportunity, bringing to light comparative scenarios and explanations for the different behaviors observed.Keywords: Computational Simulation; Project Management; Goldratt; Critical Chain; CCPM; PERT/CPM.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815
10.15675/gepros.v16i3.2815
url https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815
identifier_str_mv 10.15675/gepros.v16i3.2815
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815/pdf
https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/2815/1955
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas; v. 16 n. 3 (2021); 01
1984-2430
reponame:GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas
collection GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas
repository.name.fl_str_mv GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gepros@feb.unesp.br||abjabbour@feb.unesp.br
_version_ 1800215698117492736