Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar |
Texto Completo: | https://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160 |
Resumo: | The term "sustainable development" has gained ground in various sectors, including the business sphere; however, its usage often tends to be reductionist and overly simplistic. Therefore, the objective of the article is to problematize different conceptions of sustainable development. Methodologically, this study is characterized as an intentional literature review that starts from the notes of Caporal e Costabeber (2000), Escobar (1995) e Veiga (2006) and in the following, it expands to other authors who complement the discussion on the distinct conceptions and “voices” of sustainable development. From this review, we classify the report 'Our Common Future' as an expression of ecotechnocratic vision, as it is supported by a neoliberal ideology closely linked to capitalism and, although it references the environment, it does so in a peripheral or instrumental manner. Meanwhile, ecosocial thinking highlights the importance of solidarity, culture, ecology, and ethics. We assume that sustainable development is a polyphonic term, and in many of its uses, it reinforces a discourse of domination, exploitation, and subordination to the current socioeconomic model. Therefore, recognizing the different notions and intentions of the term is necessary to avoid its misuse, being able to use it safely and with an understanding of its origin, whatever it may be. |
id |
UNESP-30_bcfb7ffd74391fdf574ac69a1d78739a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:codaf.tupa.unesp.br:8082:article/160 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-30 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significationsDesarrollo Sostenible: un concepto polifónico en constantes disputas y consecuentes re-significacionesDesenvolvimento Sustentável: um conceito polifônico em constantes disputas e consequentes re-significaçõesDesenvolvimento SustentávelSustentabilidadeDiscursosSustainable developmentSustainabilitySpeechsDesarrollo SostenibleSostenibilidadDiscursosThe term "sustainable development" has gained ground in various sectors, including the business sphere; however, its usage often tends to be reductionist and overly simplistic. Therefore, the objective of the article is to problematize different conceptions of sustainable development. Methodologically, this study is characterized as an intentional literature review that starts from the notes of Caporal e Costabeber (2000), Escobar (1995) e Veiga (2006) and in the following, it expands to other authors who complement the discussion on the distinct conceptions and “voices” of sustainable development. From this review, we classify the report 'Our Common Future' as an expression of ecotechnocratic vision, as it is supported by a neoliberal ideology closely linked to capitalism and, although it references the environment, it does so in a peripheral or instrumental manner. Meanwhile, ecosocial thinking highlights the importance of solidarity, culture, ecology, and ethics. We assume that sustainable development is a polyphonic term, and in many of its uses, it reinforces a discourse of domination, exploitation, and subordination to the current socioeconomic model. Therefore, recognizing the different notions and intentions of the term is necessary to avoid its misuse, being able to use it safely and with an understanding of its origin, whatever it may be.El término "desarrollo sostenible" ha ganado espacio en diversos sectores, incluido el empresarial; sin embargo, su uso a veces es reduccionista y demasiado simplista. Dicho esto, el objetivo del artículo es problematizar diferentes concepciones de desarrollo sostenible. Metodológicamente, este estudio se caracteriza como una revisión bibliográfica intencional que parte de las contribuciones de Caporal y Costabeber (2000), Escobar (1995) y Veiga (2006), y luego se expande a otros autores que complementan la discusión sobre las diferentes concepciones y "voces" del desarrollo sostenible. A partir de esta revisión, clasificamos el informe "Nuestro Futuro en Común" como una expresión de la visión ecotecnocrática, ya que está respaldado por un ideal neoliberal estrechamente relacionado con el capitalismo y, aunque hace referencia al medio ambiente, lo hace de manera periférica o instrumental. Por otro lado, el pensamiento ecossocial resalta la valoración de la solidaridad, la cultura, la ecología y la ética. Asumimos que el desarrollo sostenible es un término polifónico y que en muchas de sus aplicaciones respalda un discurso de dominación, explotación y subordinación al modelo socioeconómico actual. Por lo tanto, reconocer las diferentes nociones e intenciones del término es necesario para evitar su uso incorrecto, permitiendo su uso de manera segura y con conocimiento de su génesis, cualquiera que esta sea.O termo “desenvolvimento sustentável” ganhou espaço em diversos segmentos inclusive em âmbito empresarial, no entanto sua utilização, por vezes, é reducionista e demasiado simplista. Isto posto, o objetivo do artigo é problematizar distintas concepções de desenvolvimento sustentável. Metodologicamente esse estudo se caracteriza como uma revisão bibliográfica intencional que parte dos apontamentos de Caporal e Costabeber (2000), Escobar (1995) e Veiga (2006) e na sequência se expande para outros autores que complementam a discussão sobre as distintas concepções e “vozes” do desenvolvimento sustentável. A partir dessa revisão classificamos o relatório “Nosso Futuro em Comum” como uma expressão da visão ecotecnocrática, pois ele é sustentado por um ideário neoliberal, estreitamente vinculado ao capitalismo e que, embora referencie o meio ambiente, o faz de maneira periférica ou instrumental. Já o pensamento ecossocial traz à tona a valorização da solidariedade, cultura, ecologia e da ética. Assumimos que o desenvolvimento sustentável é um termo polifônico e que em muitas de suas utilizações corrobora um discurso de dominação, exploração e subordinação ao modelo socioeconômico vigente. Portanto, reconhecer as diferentes noções e intenções do termo faz-se necessário para evitar seu uso de maneira equivocada, podendo dizê-lo de maneira segura e com ciência de sua gênese, seja ela qual for.Universidade Estadual Paulista2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPaper peer-reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160Electronic Journal Digital Skills for Family Farming; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Electronic Journal Digital Skills for Family Farming; 38-68Revista Electrónica Competencias Digitales para Agricultura Familiar; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023): Revista Electrónica Competencias Digitales para Agricultura Familiar; 38-68Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar; v. 9 n. 1 (2023): Revista Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar; 38-682448-0452reponame:Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiarinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160/397http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGregolin, Marcos RobertoGregolin, Graciela CarolineWizniewsky, Jose Geraldo Souza, Renato Santos de 2023-10-12T16:44:50Zoai:codaf.tupa.unesp.br:8082:article/160Revistahttp://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodafPUBhttp://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/oai||fernando@rodrigues.pro.br2448-04522448-0452opendoar:2023-10-12T16:44:50Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations Desarrollo Sostenible: un concepto polifónico en constantes disputas y consecuentes re-significaciones Desenvolvimento Sustentável: um conceito polifônico em constantes disputas e consequentes re-significações |
title |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
spellingShingle |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations Gregolin, Marcos Roberto Desenvolvimento Sustentável Sustentabilidade Discursos Sustainable development Sustainability Speechs Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Discursos |
title_short |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
title_full |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
title_fullStr |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
title_sort |
Sustainable Development: a polyphonic concept in constant disputes and resulting re-significations |
author |
Gregolin, Marcos Roberto |
author_facet |
Gregolin, Marcos Roberto Gregolin, Graciela Caroline Wizniewsky, Jose Geraldo Souza, Renato Santos de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gregolin, Graciela Caroline Wizniewsky, Jose Geraldo Souza, Renato Santos de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gregolin, Marcos Roberto Gregolin, Graciela Caroline Wizniewsky, Jose Geraldo Souza, Renato Santos de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Desenvolvimento Sustentável Sustentabilidade Discursos Sustainable development Sustainability Speechs Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Discursos |
topic |
Desenvolvimento Sustentável Sustentabilidade Discursos Sustainable development Sustainability Speechs Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Discursos |
description |
The term "sustainable development" has gained ground in various sectors, including the business sphere; however, its usage often tends to be reductionist and overly simplistic. Therefore, the objective of the article is to problematize different conceptions of sustainable development. Methodologically, this study is characterized as an intentional literature review that starts from the notes of Caporal e Costabeber (2000), Escobar (1995) e Veiga (2006) and in the following, it expands to other authors who complement the discussion on the distinct conceptions and “voices” of sustainable development. From this review, we classify the report 'Our Common Future' as an expression of ecotechnocratic vision, as it is supported by a neoliberal ideology closely linked to capitalism and, although it references the environment, it does so in a peripheral or instrumental manner. Meanwhile, ecosocial thinking highlights the importance of solidarity, culture, ecology, and ethics. We assume that sustainable development is a polyphonic term, and in many of its uses, it reinforces a discourse of domination, exploitation, and subordination to the current socioeconomic model. Therefore, recognizing the different notions and intentions of the term is necessary to avoid its misuse, being able to use it safely and with an understanding of its origin, whatever it may be. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Paper peer-reviewed |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160 |
url |
https://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://owl.tupa.unesp.br/recodaf/index.php/recodaf/article/view/160/397 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Electronic Journal Digital Skills for Family Farming; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Electronic Journal Digital Skills for Family Farming; 38-68 Revista Electrónica Competencias Digitales para Agricultura Familiar; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2023): Revista Electrónica Competencias Digitales para Agricultura Familiar; 38-68 Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar; v. 9 n. 1 (2023): Revista Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar; 38-68 2448-0452 reponame:Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica Competências Digitais para Agricultura Familiar - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||fernando@rodrigues.pro.br |
_version_ |
1797239941066915840 |